2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary claims the "moderate" label. Interesting.
Particularly interesting since she's running on a very progressive platform. I see a few possibilities.
1) She's making an early play for the center in the GE. Probably a good move. Distinguish herself from Sanders on the left and appeal to independents.
2) She's looking to consolidate moderate Dem voters for the primary, and also implicitly making the electability argument.
Probably a bit of both, and either way, given that this is Hillary, there's surely some polling behind this strategy.
The good thing here is that, with Sanders on her left, she can credibly claim to be a moderate while at the same time running a progressive platform. If it works out it could pave the way for a general shift to the left in the American political spectrum, which is long overdue.
One great thing Sanders has done is bring things like single payer, $15 minimum wage, free college, etc. into the mainstream, and shown that they can get significant support. That stuff won't get through congress, but just having it as part of the discussion changes the conversation.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Will she stick with a progressive program if elected, or will she govern as a moderate? I guess everybody has to make that call themselves.
Bryant
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But having Bernie in the race gives her the opportunity to claim the moderate position as well. I don't see any reason to doubt that is she's elected, she'll continue in a progressive direction building on Obama's accomplishments.
marmar
(77,078 posts)In what alternate universe?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)address large social problems with the purpose of advancing society. Goals are inherently liberal/moderate, or it isn't "progressive." I.e., the conservative prohibition movement is not considered progressive, even though it used government to "advance" society. Nor was Germany's National Socialists' attempt to "improve" society through government-run mass murder. Social Security and the federal unemployment insurance program are.
Who's a progressive?
Liberals can be progressives, and often are - or not.
Moderates can be progressives, and often are - or not.
Conservatives can be progressives, and some have been - or not.
Hard-core conservatives can also be progressive on some issues, although if you tell your very conservative neighbor she is at least progressive in her support for the national school lunch program, you may make her angry.
During the era that preceded the "Reagan Revolution" beginning roughly 1975, Congress had many moderate/moderately conservative progressives. They have since mostly been purged from office, and right-wing mind-twisters have attempted to redefine progressive as synonymous with liberal (and therefore bad).
But it is not.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Irony alert! You have been going on and on how Bernie IS a socialist because he has said he is (despite the fact that he is clearly a Capitalist and a Democratic Socialist), but NOW when Hillary says she is a "moderate", you are telling us she is actually a "Progressive".
My head is spinning. Time for bed on this side of the world, but I look forward to your reply!
DanTex
(20,709 posts)to the left to claim the moderate territory while campaigning on a progressive platform. It's smart.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)This one is no different.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I'm in awe of your logic.
Spirochete
(5,264 posts)but once she's elected, she'll revert back to Cersei Lanister.
Response to DanTex (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Which is great.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Labels are so misleading. She is a corporate Democrat but I guess that wouldn't sell to well to the Democratic base.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)position for the GE. Instead, having Bernie in the race is allowing her to run on a progressive platform while at the same time credibly playing the role of moderate, between the socialist and the GOP.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)You speak for you not me and I am as progressive liberal as you!
You need to stop claiming you are the good guys and we are not.
We are not different we just support different people!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Pull in the independents which are mostly moderate. She will keep all the Obama voters. Keep most of the AA and Latino vote and of course have 99% of the female vote.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)There is no middle in a two party system. Independents do not go with the status quo. Sanders will clean up with Independents.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)The middle of the road independent does not exist in large numbers. They are typically at the outer edges of the left-right spectrum. Since the Democratic party of today is, by it's works, holding the same location on the left-right spectrum that the Reagan administration did, it appears to me that the majority of independents would occupy the left side of the spectrum.
jfern
(5,204 posts)who votes for the candidate most similar to them on the issues is such a ridiculous myth.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)If your goal is a rightward march towards totalitarian militaristic fascism and generational oligarchy.
How come it appears that the Democratic party is the only one that tries to sell this idea to it's constituency? I never see the other party do this. They just push further right.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)That's what seems to happen to my inbox when I suggest that Clinton is a "centrist" or a "moderate"?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But the presence of Sanders makes it much more difficult to paint her as some kind of way out of touch Trotskyite, which is what the GOP tries to do every time around.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)...who holds basically every Sanders policy position. And this will make more people like and believe her??????????????????
DanTex
(20,709 posts)claim credibility. The thing is, Hillary is far enough left that the policies that Sanders advocates to her left won't get through congress anyway. But she's not for Single Payer, for example, she's not for free college tuition, etc.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)policies.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And so early in the campaign! I expected this spin a few more months down the road.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:44 PM - Edit history (1)
You can hang on to your 8% of the voters but to win you need more than that.
20% of Dems when Dems are 40% of voters is 8% of voters
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)under a right wing regime!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)YabaDabaNoDinoNo
(460 posts)And progressive votes when she really a moderate?
It is nothing new to have a politician lie just not this blaently, at least for a democrat
Her choice, my vote, guess we will see how it goes in a few months and if she is what the party wants
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Home of the Whopper.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo
(460 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)It's getting deep quick!
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So she will be running to the right. She will not get the Independent vote. She will get no votes from disgruntled Republicans and Libertarians. She won't get the left vote. She is painting herself in a corner with this one.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo
(460 posts)The must be good for a vote or two.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I consider Hillary to be a moderate. As is Obama, imo.