Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPro-Clinton Super PAC sees $25 million haul since July
Pro-Clinton super PAC sees $25 million haul since July
By Gabriel Debenedetti
09/18/15, 01:09 PM EDT
The super PAC supporting Hillary Clinton has brought in $25 million in commitments since July 1, a senior Priorities USA Action official told POLITICO.
It's a big haul after a scuffling start that left Clinton and her top staff panicked. With the new commitments, Priorities' 2015 total rises above $40 million.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-2016-priorities-usa-25-million-213826
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 786 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pro-Clinton Super PAC sees $25 million haul since July (Original Post)
Cali_Democrat
Sep 2015
OP
"Under the new rules that were adopted last year, someone can write a check for $300,000." n/t
PoliticAverse
Sep 2015
#1
The is the Super PAC that supports Hillary. This is not Hillary's campaign. nt
Cali_Democrat
Sep 2015
#3
I'm sure she'll return any corporate money and refuse any future contributions from them.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2015
#4
So, will she reject their help and efforts because it's funded by corporate money?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2015
#7
They do it, so I do it"? Isn't that the same reason she voted for Bush's war?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2015
#10
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)1. "Under the new rules that were adopted last year, someone can write a check for $300,000." n/t
99Forever
(14,524 posts)2. Nice to see Hillary 's priorities remain exactly the same. Permanently.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)3. The is the Super PAC that supports Hillary. This is not Hillary's campaign. nt
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)4. I'm sure she'll return any corporate money and refuse any future contributions from them.
Won't she?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)6. It's not her money to return, it's the Super Pac's money. nt
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)7. So, will she reject their help and efforts because it's funded by corporate money?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)8. Unilateral disarmament makes no sense in a post-Citizens United world.
Vowing to only fight with a slingshot when the other side has a nuclear bomb makes very little sense IMO.
But I'm not a campaign official, so you're asking the wrong person.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)10. They do it, so I do it"? Isn't that the same reason she voted for Bush's war?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)14. Yeah... Right... Uh huh
I realize you think we are idiots.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)5. Any numbers on the Pro-Sanders Super Pac?
Edit: Love that photo of Clinton.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)9. Hillary's Citizens United harvest!
Can't buy me love.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)11. "... checks in the million-dollar range"
From the link:
"The super PACs haul comes largely from donors willing to contribute checks in the million-dollar range"
AKA -- the upper 1%
msongs
(67,405 posts)12. just yesterday the bernie crowd was bragging about bernie's million dollar haul. ooops nt
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)13. And they tied it to an "attack on Bernie!" without a shred of evidence.
Ron Green
(9,822 posts)15. This is the Shame of politics.
Perhaps this cycle it will change. Maybe not, though.
jkbRN
(850 posts)16. This is truly disheartening