Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:07 PM Sep 2015

If you think the Hillary is GOP lite, then you have no idea what the GOP is.

I have to wonder whether people calling Hillary GOP lite have watched any of the GOP debates, or even seen an interview with a Republican.

The GOP wants to get rid of Obamacare and take away health insurance from millions. They want to get rid of Dodd Frank and deregulate banks. In fact, they want to deregulate everything. They don't believe in global warming. The want mass deportation. The want abortion to be a crime. They want to be able to legally discriminate against gay people. They all buy into supply-side economics, meaning tax cuts for rich people and fiscal austerity. They are against raising the minimum wage, in fact many want to get rid of it entirely. They want to destroy unions. They are unanimously opposed to the Iran deal.

Did I miss anything? Yes, I missed a lot of things, but you get the idea.

None of the leading Dem candidates remotely resemble the GOP. If you think so, you don't know the GOP.

70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you think the Hillary is GOP lite, then you have no idea what the GOP is. (Original Post) DanTex Sep 2015 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Sep 2015 #1
Bottom line: the GOP is sponsored by and in service to the 1%. senz Sep 2015 #2
Here's the thing, DanTex... Scootaloo Sep 2015 #3
Well, she would be President of the entire country, no matter how disgusting Hoyt Sep 2015 #9
How...unusually balanced, Hoyt. Good for you. It doesn't sound as if you would PREFER Hortensis Sep 2015 #20
A "Third Way Democrat", whatever that means, is about 300 years ahead of anyone in the neo-GOP. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #4
I think Clinton is a center-right corporatist establishment Democrat. Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #5
...and as recently as 1992, she'd have probably been chased out of the Democratic party for it. Chan790 Sep 2015 #7
1992 was Bill Clinton's first victory, and Hillary has always been more liberal than him. DanTex Sep 2015 #11
She wasn't in the party as a candidate then artislife Sep 2015 #19
Whatever, the time of the Third-Way Democrat is OVER. Done. Hortensis Sep 2015 #23
I see her as center-left, but I guess that depends what "center" means. DanTex Sep 2015 #10
That is because you use the term "center" to mean half-way between republicans and democrats. Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #13
I think by that standard she would be just plain left. DanTex Sep 2015 #17
I have no problem saying Hillary is Center Left - on today's political spectrum anyway Tom Rinaldo Sep 2015 #6
Good perspective on today's reality. Hortensis Sep 2015 #24
She fights them on the Culture Wars, not so much on the Ruling Class. Ron Green Sep 2015 #8
That's simply not true. She wants to raise the minimum wage, they want to get rid of it. DanTex Sep 2015 #12
Clinton has refused to support the $15 min. Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #15
She's for $12, which would be the highest inflation-adjusted ever. DanTex Sep 2015 #18
It is you being dishonest about her support for the campaign to raise the min. Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #21
Huh? She wants to raise the minimum wage, period. DanTex Sep 2015 #25
No, he's really not. Interesting how willing some here are to keep the minimum Hortensis Sep 2015 #27
And she lied to Ready for $15 Pope Sweet Jesus Sep 2015 #37
YES!!! artislife Sep 2015 #22
So does that make Bernie GOP lite also for only advocating $15? DanTex Sep 2015 #26
Not in comparison to Hillary artislife Sep 2015 #30
It's got nothing to do with comparing him to Hillary. If you conclude that Hillary is GOP lite DanTex Sep 2015 #33
Bull, but I would rather not build your count numbers any higher. nt artislife Sep 2015 #40
The magic $15 doesn't work across the board Gloria Sep 2015 #67
She was happy to not fight them on lgbt equality until it became politically Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #16
She started ACTIVELY supporting equality when a majority of Americans did, Hortensis Sep 2015 #32
Exactly!! K&R. nt Persondem Sep 2015 #14
She's not going to magically make every branch of the government... Walk away Sep 2015 #28
Hillary Clinton is no republican lite and is a Democrat Gothmog Sep 2015 #29
The mega-left is about as off the rails as the TeaCrazy RePukes. RBInMaine Sep 2015 #31
I think your post indicates how far the "center" has been moved Ron Green Sep 2015 #34
yep Roy Ellefson Sep 2015 #39
No, the paranoid fringe called FDR a JP Morgan loving fascist Recursion Sep 2015 #61
actually that supports my point Roy Ellefson Sep 2015 #63
OK, but Pete was explicitly toeing the Stalinist line here Recursion Sep 2015 #66
true Roy Ellefson Sep 2015 #69
I'm surprised to see this and your other posts today. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #57
+1 and then some leftofcool Sep 2015 #58
+1 treestar Sep 2015 #65
Kinda like comparing being run over by a logging truck or a VW. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #35
Good analogy. nm rhett o rick Sep 2015 #42
Word. cheapdate Sep 2015 #36
The only way to reverse course is to attack from the left not compare to the right. Broward Sep 2015 #38
Not saying that H. Clinton is GOP but will say that the Third Way, while yielding some rhett o rick Sep 2015 #41
but that's the point ain't it? stupidicus Sep 2015 #51
Of course. I think she sympathizes with the 99% but not to the point of harming the 1%. rhett o rick Sep 2015 #53
good assessment stupidicus Sep 2015 #54
Well, she's to the right of this guy: MannyGoldstein Sep 2015 #43
lol stupidicus Sep 2015 #52
Hillary is at least as conservative as GOP from 1940 to 1980 jfern Sep 2015 #44
What about from 1900 to 1940? redstateblues Sep 2015 #46
The Middle Now colsohlibgal Sep 2015 #45
There is no doubt in my mind jkbRN Sep 2015 #47
How dare you. iandhr Sep 2015 #48
so what you struggle with the "lite" concept, eh? stupidicus Sep 2015 #49
What's Up With 6 Debates???? highprincipleswork Sep 2015 #50
The power structure of the Democratic party is where the Republican party was 30 years ago, RichVRichV Sep 2015 #55
Oh absolutely, but SusanCalvin Sep 2015 #56
Hillary WAS a Republican... HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #59
Not being a neoBircher does not exclude one from being conservative and even reactionary in areas. TheKentuckian Sep 2015 #60
Centrists can be Democrats Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2015 #62
I agree; that meme is just insane treestar Sep 2015 #64
Spot on. NCTraveler Sep 2015 #68
She's so GOP-lite/3rd way/etc. that the GOP & ordinary RWers hate her. eom Jamaal510 Sep 2015 #70

Response to DanTex (Original post)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
3. Here's the thing, DanTex...
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:13 PM
Sep 2015

Your list of the Republican's goals is spot-on.

And Clinton wants to be all bipartisanship, compromise, and "Warm Purple Sauce" with all of that. She looks at that laundry list and says "Well, I can definite cut a deal with 'em!"

I find that deeply problematic.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. Well, she would be President of the entire country, no matter how disgusting
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:27 PM
Sep 2015

a significant portion is. Fact is, roughly 50% of the country believes right wing bull. They deserve some consideration by Democrats, but not too much.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
20. How...unusually balanced, Hoyt. Good for you. It doesn't sound as if you would PREFER
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:11 PM
Sep 2015

to LOSE EVERYTHING to the right wing, to sacrifice every goal and every principle, rather than compromise even a bit. And to acknowledge that one's fellow citizens should be considered. How democratic. How decent and responsible.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. A "Third Way Democrat", whatever that means, is about 300 years ahead of anyone in the neo-GOP.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:14 PM
Sep 2015

Golden Dawn of Greece seems to be their new model.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
5. I think Clinton is a center-right corporatist establishment Democrat.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:15 PM
Sep 2015

Most certainly the loons on stage at the clown show are way to the right of Clinton. So what?

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
7. ...and as recently as 1992, she'd have probably been chased out of the Democratic party for it.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:20 PM
Sep 2015

I'm not sure what Dan's point is in ignoring the Clintons' direct culpability in the rightward drift of the Democratic mainstream.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
11. 1992 was Bill Clinton's first victory, and Hillary has always been more liberal than him.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:29 PM
Sep 2015

You think Hillary would have been chased out of the party that just won the presidency with Bill?

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
19. She wasn't in the party as a candidate then
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:10 PM
Sep 2015

She was the wife of a candidate, like Tipper Gore. I don't think anyone would have chased a mere voter.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
10. I see her as center-left, but I guess that depends what "center" means.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:28 PM
Sep 2015

But regardless of how we calibrate the spectrum, the "GOP lite" thing is totally false.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
13. That is because you use the term "center" to mean half-way between republicans and democrats.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:41 PM
Sep 2015

Just because the Republican Party has moved way to the right doesn't change where the ideological center is. To illustrate: health care policy. Clinton wants to keep our privatized system with the ACA reforms. Sanders wants to change that to a universal single payer system. Sanders is advocating the standard Democratic Party position for all of my life up until Bill Clinton - expand medicare to everyone. Clinton and Obama support Bob Dole's center right alternative - government subsidized private healthcare. The Republican Party, meanwhile, abandoned Bob Dole's alternative to medicare for everyone and is advocating "pay for your own fucking doctor and leave us alone". That doesn't make Clinton's position on healthcare suddenly center-left, it continues to be the center-right position it was when it was Bob Dole's proposal.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
17. I think by that standard she would be just plain left.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:54 PM
Sep 2015

Based on her voting record, she was on the liberal side of the Democratic party.

On healthcare specifically, a public-private hybrid system is a perfectly viable way to achieve universal coverage. It works out in many other nations including Holland, France, Switzerland, etc. Obamacare doesn't get us there, but it provides an avenue to getting us there if we gradually improve it. The fact that it was a Republican plan 30 years ago doesn't matter to me. What matters is actually getting universal coverage and cost control.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
6. I have no problem saying Hillary is Center Left - on today's political spectrum anyway
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:17 PM
Sep 2015

She might have matched the Republican Lite label if today's Republican Party were more like it was back in the Nixon to Ford days. Hillary had among the more Liberal voting records when she was in the Senate. The thing is though that Bernie has always voted like a New Deal Democrat - he never drifted to the Right.

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
8. She fights them on the Culture Wars, not so much on the Ruling Class.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:23 PM
Sep 2015

And TV loves covering the Culture Wars.

Not so much the Ruling Class.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
12. That's simply not true. She wants to raise the minimum wage, they want to get rid of it.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:31 PM
Sep 2015

She wants to expand union rights and employee free choice, the GOP wants to kill unions. She wants to raise taxes on the rich, the GOP wants to cut them. They want to kill Obamacare and Social Security, she wants to protect and expand them. And so on.

On economic issues as well as social issues, across the board, there is a massive difference between Hillary and the GOP.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
21. It is you being dishonest about her support for the campaign to raise the min.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:11 PM
Sep 2015

She is doing her triangulation thing, undermining the growing support for 15 by using her bully pulpit to advocate for less than that, and signalling that a Clinton presidency will be to the right of the democratic base.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
25. Huh? She wants to raise the minimum wage, period.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:14 PM
Sep 2015

The only thing different is the target. Like I said, $12 is a historical high, inflation-adjusted.

How this is "GOP lite" when the GOP either wants to keep it low or else get rid of it entirely is beyond me. I think you are letting your animosity for Hillary get in the way of your judgement.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
27. No, he's really not. Interesting how willing some here are to keep the minimum
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:17 PM
Sep 2015

wage at poverty level rather than compromise on an achievable level. I'm guessing those people don't live on minimum wage themselves.

 

Pope Sweet Jesus

(62 posts)
37. And she lied to Ready for $15
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:38 PM
Sep 2015

people that she would support that.

That's one of many reasons I am not selecting her for my nominee for President.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
30. Not in comparison to Hillary
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:22 PM
Sep 2015

You see, we are debating between 3 candidates for the Democratic Nominee. O'Malley, short of a miracle is out and Biden isn't in it, so really we are comparing Hillary and Bernie. Guess what? She is the Democratic Lite version and the Republican Lite version. Bernie is Democratic and the Republicans are Republican.

I don't know why this is so hard to understand.

As far as advocating for $15 it is the furthest towards equitity that anyone is suggesting...so he is ahead of the pack. Hardly the definition of lite anything. He is full bodied!

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
33. It's got nothing to do with comparing him to Hillary. If you conclude that Hillary is GOP lite
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:28 PM
Sep 2015

for not raising the minimum wage far enough, then you must conclude that Bernie is also GOP lite, because he doesn't raise it far enough for you either. Which also means Bernie is the "lesser evil" and all that other nonsense.

Gloria

(17,663 posts)
67. The magic $15 doesn't work across the board
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:02 PM
Sep 2015

It would put our local NM business out of business...

There are wide differences in cost of living, types of jobs in areas, etc...

really need to get more info

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
16. She was happy to not fight them on lgbt equality until it became politically
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 03:48 PM
Sep 2015

expedient to stop doing that.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
32. She started ACTIVELY supporting equality when a majority of Americans did,
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:25 PM
Sep 2015

although still well before it was possible to get equality passed in most states.

This is how representative democracy, of government by the people, for the people, and by the people, usually works. Change occurs when enough people want it.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
28. She's not going to magically make every branch of the government...
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:20 PM
Sep 2015

into Socialists so that must mean she is the secret Evil Queen of the GOP!

There was a time on DU where this remark wouldn't need a smilie. Now....who knows?

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
31. The mega-left is about as off the rails as the TeaCrazy RePukes.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:24 PM
Sep 2015

Progressive is one thing. Then there is the mega-left. Paranoid. Very extreme. Willing to say crazy shit like "Hillary is right wing and a Republican." and other crazy crap. They're the fringe. No point trying to argue with them. They are the TeaLEFT.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
61. No, the paranoid fringe called FDR a JP Morgan loving fascist
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 01:00 AM
Sep 2015

FDR was the corporatist lesser of two evils to hear the fringe from the 1930s. Just like actual liberals like Obama and Clinton are excoriated as crypto-conservatives by the equally unhinged fringe today.

Here's Pete Seeger accusing FDR of felating J P Morgan:



(Note he still played bluegrass-style at this point rather than clawhammer; this is just about the earliest recording of Seeger there is.)
 

Roy Ellefson

(279 posts)
63. actually that supports my point
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 11:35 AM
Sep 2015

it supports my point in how far to the right the Democratic Party has moved on economic issues. The left back in FDR's day really were socialists. To pretend that Obama and HRC are economic liberals (no I'm not referring to classical liberalism) is silly...they are as centrists as they come with a few bones thrown to the working class. Still waiting for Obama to put on some comfortable shoes and walk a picket line.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
66. OK, but Pete was explicitly toeing the Stalinist line here
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 11:43 AM
Sep 2015

If that's something that's gone from the Left I'm rather glad about that.

 

Roy Ellefson

(279 posts)
69. true
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:38 AM
Sep 2015

they were naive and stupid about the Soviet Union..chalk that up to idealism...that being said they remained lefts and socialists

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
58. +1 and then some
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 08:07 PM
Sep 2015

If the mega-left aren't whining about more debates, they are whining about something Hillary "didn't" say. Makes me wonder why they care about her so much. If you aren't going to vote for her anyway, why do you give a shit what she does or says?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
35. Kinda like comparing being run over by a logging truck or a VW.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:37 PM
Sep 2015

One will probably kill you outright. The VW may have back up and repeat to do the job.

I'm sticking with the bicycle...aka Bernie....or some other candidate rather than either the truck or (not as bad) VW.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
38. The only way to reverse course is to attack from the left not compare to the right.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:41 PM
Sep 2015

We can't give her cover because she's to the left of today's Republicans. Otherwise, we only enable the ongoing rightward drift of both parties.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
41. Not saying that H. Clinton is GOP but will say that the Third Way, while yielding some
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:57 PM
Sep 2015

for social issues, do agree with the GOP on lots of issues like:

Fracking

The TPP

Wars in the Middle East

The XL Pipeline

Arctic Drilling

NSA/CIA domestic spying

Drone killing

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
51. but that's the point ain't it?
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:06 PM
Sep 2015

selective misuae of the issues?

Of course those that level the charge against her do so with specific issues of that kind in mind...

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
53. Of course. I think she sympathizes with the 99% but not to the point of harming the 1%.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:13 PM
Sep 2015

The key is wealth inequality. If that's allowed to continue at the current rate, the 99% will soon all be paupers and have zero political power. I do not believe that she will hold the wealthy 1% accountable. Her comments so far about the wealth inequality have been aimed at "growing the economy", which won't help and having the middle class pay for programs for the poor.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
54. good assessment
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:27 PM
Sep 2015

that she's better than any repub isn't and never has been up for debate, and is the foundation for the good cop role she plays in the good/bad characterization of DC politics.

Will Bernie play that game as she has?

To his supporters he represents at least a small break from that game and hope for a burying of it.

Hillary represents the use and perpetuation of it...

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
43. Well, she's to the right of this guy:
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 05:37 PM
Sep 2015


So we can frame it many different ways, but one of them ain't that she stands for traditional Democratic values.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
45. The Middle Now
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 05:41 PM
Sep 2015

Is not where the middle is now. The whole political baseline has moved hard right.

We need to move it back hard left and that sure is not Hillary. It is Bernie, and that is why he is surging.

jkbRN

(850 posts)
47. There is no doubt in my mind
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 05:54 PM
Sep 2015

that she is a centrist, which is why I will not be voting for her in the democratic primary.

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
48. How dare you.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 05:54 PM
Sep 2015

You are speaking facts. DU is a fact free zone when it comes to Clinton and the President.


 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
49. so what you struggle with the "lite" concept, eh?
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:04 PM
Sep 2015
https://consortiumnews.com/2014/02/10/is-hillary-clinton-a-neocon-lite/


the rest of us will try to overlook it.

I suppose that's supposed to be what, a good substitute for a detailed comparison against her promary opponent/s?
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
50. What's Up With 6 Debates????
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:06 PM
Sep 2015

6 debates makes no sense, especially considering the horrible times that the DNC has scheduled them.

The more Debbie Wasserman Schultz tries to explain the rationale, the more it sounds like the fix is in.

Less debates, less exposure for lesser known candidates, less opportunity for the best candidate to emerge.

I am Democratic and have voted that way for over 40 years.

The best way to get me to not vote for the Democratic nominee is to have a rigged system. If this 6 debate system and othe shenanigans do not stop, it's going to be hard for me to support the Democratic nominee.

I doubt that I am alone.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
55. The power structure of the Democratic party is where the Republican party was 30 years ago,
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:01 PM
Sep 2015

at least economically. Just because the Republicans of today are so much more right does nor change that fact.

Everything is relative.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
60. Not being a neoBircher does not exclude one from being conservative and even reactionary in areas.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 08:48 PM
Sep 2015

I can think of this guy that pushed through the largest expansion of Medicare in a generation, favored comprehensive immigration reform, pushed two stimulus programs through, and more than one major unemployment extension.

That fella was arguably the worst President in US history and clearly a far right wing ideolog, the fella is George W. Bush.

All kinds of fucked up people are to the left, even well to the left of the current radical regressive delusional nutjobs. It is hardly a useful standard candle.

What the hell are Reagan, Nixon, and Goldwater sensible centrists?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
68. Spot on.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:03 PM
Sep 2015

One of the exciting things about Sanders is the new people he is bringing in. One thing that comes along with that are less than well thought out political comments. Gently nudge them in the right direction. Some we can keep around in the party after the primaries. The isolationists and libertarians will remove themselves from our side after the primary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If you think the Hillary ...