The real reason Clinton supporters are being called

[McCamy Taylor]

1) Mindless foot soldiers of the DNC

2) who are fixated upon gender identity

3) as well as being DINOs

4) and War hawks

5) and Infatuated (with their goddess aka the You Know What of You Know Where, won't say the word but it rhymes with "travel on&quot

6) Dirty tricksters

is because name calling is one of the most popular sports in the Democratic Party primary!

[Bonobo]

1. Any objective viewing of this site can only reveal...

that it is the Sanders supporters, by far, who are the more demonized ones, while Sanders supporters legitimately tend to restrict their criticism to the actual candidate.

[McCamy Taylor]

2. Sorry. Did I try to steal someone's victimhood?

[Scootaloo]

3. Your posts are increasingly strange, McCamy.

I mean, after this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=603541
I thought maybe you were done with the weekly weird.

[jfern]

5. Don't worry, Hillary supporters still win in claiming they're the victim

[reddread]

9. gifting people, more like it

https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/01/world/iraq-sanctions-kill-children-un-reports.html


too bad there are so many more stories on the same sick lines to post
not enough time this morning.

[Warren DeMontague]

30. you gonna stick around in this thread?

Those other ones you posted you seemed to sort of vacate in a hurry.

[dorkzilla]

34. The poster is the DU equivalent of the kid who sets a bag of dog poop on fire

on someone’s doorstep, rings the bell and runs away.

I noticed on their “all your base” post they used the popcorn-eating smiley at end of their OP. They think they’re being “funny”.

I think it’s probably a 17 year old in his mom’s basement.

[Renew Deal]

14. Except that you're not objective

[sibelian]

17. Furnish us with the objective view, by all means, Renew Deal.

God forbid that DU would suffer from a surfeit of subjective interpretation.

[Metric System]

16. My head almost fell off from shaking so hard. DU has become a Sanders forum. His supporters

are the majority here so it's completely ridiculous to say you're the ones being demonized.

[sibelian]

18. That makes absolutely no sense at all, does it?

How does "being in the majority" become "not being demonised"?

[NCTraveler]

24. Yes, like Hillary beat up an old man. lol.

You took a beating on that one for days before deleting it.

[highprincipleswork]

4. No, it's because they act that way.

Prove you're different.

For instance, call for more debates, just to be fair. Just to bend over backwards to be fair. What do you have to lose? If your candidate is truly superior, she will win anyway. If not, she never deserved to win in the first place.

[Renew Deal]

15. Blame the victim

[frylock]

38. Who is the victim in this scenario?

[coyote]

6. Oh please

Sometimes a cigar ist just a cigar.

[delrem]

7. I don't give a fuck about "Clinton supporters".

My beef is with Hillary Clinton, and I post about actual differences on ISSUES.

I don't really like listening to your complaint.

[uponit7771]

8. Its mostly because some are convinced that the GOP congress doesn't exist and every pie in the sky

... liberal tenant can be adhered to without compromise to the T.

They're bedazzled by the Captain Obvious statements of "we should's" vs the "here's how I'm going to do this" cause talking with a vein coming out of ones head is more effective in making them feel like progress has happened than actual progress (which they'll complain about anyway)

They've also been convinced the last person who said anything like the aforementioned was really a corporatist who is paid by the establishment to stoke the left into voting for him.

There's no doubt a since of entitlement in the air...

[beam me up scottie]

10. Entitlement? Like the op telling women and minorities they're owned by the Clintons?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=603541

[uponit7771]

11. Yeah, to the point of reflexive snide to be the expected responses vs real answers on tough

... questions about some candidates.

[beam me up scottie]

12. Honest? You mean that flamebait op full of loaded questions we didn't take seriously?

Sorry to disappoint you but if you think that was honest I can't help you.

And when it comes to snide say hello to kettle.

[uponit7771]

13. No, in 9 months there have been a slew of questions some similar to the OP and asked in a

more productive way that still get the same response.

After SC et al we'll see...

I'm supporting the candidate that gets the nomination no matter what, dems have some good people to choose from

[DonCoquixote]

32. +10

it is funny how people can talk as if they are defending women, but fail to realize that for all her bluster, Hillary's actions have gotten a lot of women hurt. The problem is, they are the ones easy to ignore, like women working at low wage because they are not allowed to unionize, teachers that have been branded as witches by charter schools advocates, or wives and daughters of Veterans. The sad fact is, when many talk about how great for women Hillary will be, they imagine reflections of themselves, and not the women they are used to walking past on a daily basis.

[beam me up scottie]

35. Well said.

So tired of people who dismiss Bernie as an "old white guy" and forget that they're supporting a rich white woman whose record on civil rights is inferior to his.

Bernie's always had our back.

[Prism]

21. Just say pony. God, this taking forever. N/t

[Bluenorthwest]

19. Until you apologize for that bigoted 'she owns the gays' OP you can kiss my gay ass McCamy

The entire nasty, condescending tone of that piece was unacceptable.

[DonCoquixote]

36. Sadly, I agree

And I say that as one of the Latinos she "owns" because they are going to put up Castro as a VP. Really Hillary is he the only Latino you know?

Look MC, though I cannot speak for everyone, I know that myself and others I know, as much as they have serious questions about Hillary, will vote to make whoever the GOP puts in there LOSE period. What we do not like is the ideas that Hillary gets to reach out from those people whose money she wants, the same people that on Election Night will whisper in her ear "Okay Hillary, you won, now ditch the baggage." There will be people thrilled that there is LGBT rights, but also know that the assault on Unions and overall wages will continue riding into high gear. There will be minorities happy that some bigot like Trump got kept out, but who notice that does not change the "last hired, first fired" policy. Yes, Civil rights need to be protected, augmented AND advanced well beyond the comfort zone of the majority, BUT, if the majority can get their way by keeping most of us poor and unemployed, or simply make more money moving jobs abroad or using and H1b visa, then we will not be able to maintain what civil rights we fought for.

[Nitram]

20. Blah, blah, blah, blah.

[Vinca]

22. The name calling works both ways.

This reminds me so much of 2008 when Obama supporters were referred to as cult members.

[Nitram]

23. Indeed it does.

and it sounds moronic both ways.

[Major Hogwash]

25. Yeah, what you said.

It gets tiresome.
The other thing that really struck out at me this year was when smart people starting calling other DU members names.
That was kind of a surprise.
And not a good one.
It changed my opinion of those people, quite a bit in some cases.

Oh, well, there's always 2020.

[liberal N proud]

26. This whole thread is too funny

Victims?

:rolf:

[upaloopa]

27. It really doesn't matter to me what anyone calls

us. You have to consider the source and the motives.
I am certain Hillary will be our next President so call me what you want it will not change that.

[Warren DeMontague]

28. this, after 2 full months of "Sanders supporters are white supremacist, libertarian, volvo driving

argula-eatin', subaltern-spurnin', doody-headed unicorn and pony-wishers"?

[artislife]

29. I don't get the "travel on" reference

But even so, I still have to give it up for this OP. I like the retread in bullet points, so much cleaner than messy, rambling essay kinds we are used to. The organizer in me loves the space around discusion (sic) points.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

37. gravel gone? Bravo Don?

[Comrade Grumpy]

39. Babylon?

[R B Garr]

31. Even teenage girls are "corpo dem fascists". Here's how:

Someone here posted pictures of a Clinton rally and the pictures included a woman and her teenage girls with their painted rally signs. But, wait...the signs looked suspicious...TOO GOOD so.......

what's next????

Well, what else could they be but CORPORATE SIGNS, LOL. Done by corporate professionals -- according to one BS supporter!! Hence the teenage girls were also corpo dem, neoliberal fascists. I was going to post a response to that but didn't waste my time. too ridiculous, too much nonsense...

LMAO!!

Hilarious.

[Snotcicles]

33. I had not seen it packaged like that before, so thank you for boiling it down for us. nt