Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton, the Asian pivot and everything you need to know about neo-liberalism
Clinton, the Asian pivot and everything you need to know about neo-liberalism
Victor Tiffany
Syracuse Progressive Examiner
September 20, 2015
On a conference call last Sunday night about the Trans-Pacific Partnership -- an un-American, international, corporate coup des lois -- one of the speakers pointed to an article written by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entitled "America's Pacific Century." The "pivot toward Asia" Clinton was initiating is actually an increased militarization of the Pacific rim and deepening of American hegemony over Asia where China is perceived as a "threat" to American dominance the region. To best understand the status-quo candidate, Secretary Clinton, Democrats (not just Sanders' supporters) need to take the time to understand neo-liberalism and its pernicious hold on the world economy.
... From President Clinton forward, the Democratic Party has embraced neo-liberalism and essentially "gone to bed" with Wall Street financiers. They are the leading figures of our world order and the top donors to Secretary Clinton.
...
Bernie Sanders has not extensively addressed neo-liberalism, but his website has an article entitled "Hurricane Katrina and Bernie Sanders: From Neoliberal Disaster to Political Revolution." Authors Adolph Reed, Michael Francis and Steve Striffler write, "Beneath the neoliberal triumphalism that has largely hijacked New Orleanians rightful pause to reflect on that literal cataclysm...to register its continuing impact, and to celebrate actual peoples resilience, lie those realities of deepening inequality and a political regime organized around reproducing it." Privitization of public services is part of the neo-liberal agenda, and increased inequality is the upshot of neo-liberalism, a political philosophy that puts profits before people, the environment and human survival as Kirk also explains in his pamphlet.
Senator Sanders' political revolution aims to offer Americans an alternative to neo-liberalism. Reed, Francis and Striffler conclude, "The great promise of the Sanders campaign is that it not only presents such an alternative (to neo-liberalism) but also provides a vehicle for building the movement necessary to make it reality." That movement is not just Sanders' campaign but many organizations working to oppose the TPP. No progressive organization in the U.S. supports the TPP for a wide variety of reasons, not least is the bold power grab it would be for transnational corporations imposing their will and usurping power from national, state and local legislatures.
In this election, Sanders' democratic socialism is the only electable alternative available to the neo-liberalism that has been embraced by the Democratic and Republican political duopoly. His supporters would do well with Democratic voters to figuratively hang neo-liberalism and the TPP around Secretary Clinton's neck like a lead life "saver" at every opportunity. Should he decide to run for President, the same holds for Vice-President Biden as well.
http://www.examiner.com/article/clinton-the-asian-pivot-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-neo-liberalism
Victor Tiffany
Syracuse Progressive Examiner
September 20, 2015
On a conference call last Sunday night about the Trans-Pacific Partnership -- an un-American, international, corporate coup des lois -- one of the speakers pointed to an article written by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entitled "America's Pacific Century." The "pivot toward Asia" Clinton was initiating is actually an increased militarization of the Pacific rim and deepening of American hegemony over Asia where China is perceived as a "threat" to American dominance the region. To best understand the status-quo candidate, Secretary Clinton, Democrats (not just Sanders' supporters) need to take the time to understand neo-liberalism and its pernicious hold on the world economy.
... From President Clinton forward, the Democratic Party has embraced neo-liberalism and essentially "gone to bed" with Wall Street financiers. They are the leading figures of our world order and the top donors to Secretary Clinton.
...
Bernie Sanders has not extensively addressed neo-liberalism, but his website has an article entitled "Hurricane Katrina and Bernie Sanders: From Neoliberal Disaster to Political Revolution." Authors Adolph Reed, Michael Francis and Steve Striffler write, "Beneath the neoliberal triumphalism that has largely hijacked New Orleanians rightful pause to reflect on that literal cataclysm...to register its continuing impact, and to celebrate actual peoples resilience, lie those realities of deepening inequality and a political regime organized around reproducing it." Privitization of public services is part of the neo-liberal agenda, and increased inequality is the upshot of neo-liberalism, a political philosophy that puts profits before people, the environment and human survival as Kirk also explains in his pamphlet.
Senator Sanders' political revolution aims to offer Americans an alternative to neo-liberalism. Reed, Francis and Striffler conclude, "The great promise of the Sanders campaign is that it not only presents such an alternative (to neo-liberalism) but also provides a vehicle for building the movement necessary to make it reality." That movement is not just Sanders' campaign but many organizations working to oppose the TPP. No progressive organization in the U.S. supports the TPP for a wide variety of reasons, not least is the bold power grab it would be for transnational corporations imposing their will and usurping power from national, state and local legislatures.
In this election, Sanders' democratic socialism is the only electable alternative available to the neo-liberalism that has been embraced by the Democratic and Republican political duopoly. His supporters would do well with Democratic voters to figuratively hang neo-liberalism and the TPP around Secretary Clinton's neck like a lead life "saver" at every opportunity. Should he decide to run for President, the same holds for Vice-President Biden as well.
http://www.examiner.com/article/clinton-the-asian-pivot-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-neo-liberalism
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 857 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton, the Asian pivot and everything you need to know about neo-liberalism (Original Post)
Catherina
Sep 2015
OP
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)1. There is a difference
Remember the "socialism with a human face" that they had In the Czech Republic in the late 1960s? We have our own version in the United States. Conservatives give us corporatism with no face, the dispassionate, amoral free market variety. Neoliberals give us corporatism with a human face, a system that provides a safety net to catch those damaged by the system. See the difference? No? That's because there is no difference, not really. Both sides take the money, so neither side will tolerate any meaningful regulation to give working class and middle class citizens a fair shot against corporations. OK, the neoliberal version is better, because you get to die in a public hospital, not out on the street.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)4. Ha! Until the privatize the public hospital that is!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)5. then you'll have to have money to die in the for profit hospital
WillyT
(72,631 posts)2. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)3. Wow. KnR. n/t
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)6. Kickety rec for visibility
Important article.