2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOn Twitter, Bernie Sanders’s supporters are becoming one of his biggest problems
Sanderss predominately white backers are targeting black activists or journalists who dare question the candidates civil rights record.
Earlier this month, I announced on Twitter that I planned to report on the disconnect between Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and black voters. Immediately, some of Sanderss self-described supporters raided my mentions with patronizing tweets.
Of course, its not fair to blame Sanders for the vitriol of trolls. But at a time when hes trying to build a relationship with black voters, his supporters can have a significant effect on his image.
Political consultant L. Joy Williams says Sanders could have won the allegiance of some black voters by responding to his supporters combative and patronizing comments and distancing himself from them. It would have been a good opportunity for the candidate to interact with black press and connect with black Americans, she said. Its not as if he went on NewsOne Now or did an interview with black press and said, I am dismayed by the way some of those who support me are treating us (black voters). That never happened.
The go-to defense for Sanderss supporters is to mention the candidates involvement in civil rights protests in the 1960s. The implication is that black Americans owe their votes to Sanders today because he did the right thing by support black Americans rights 60 years ago. This patronizing position not only assumes that black Americans are one-issue voters, but also that their one issue has been solved for five decades.
more.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/09/23/on-twitter-bernie-sanderss-supporters-are-becoming-one-of-his-biggest-problems/
daleanime
(17,796 posts)The fact that he has so many is driving certain folks off the cliff.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Millions spent in New Hampshire by Clinton, and those harmful supporters got Bernie in the lead .
reddread
(6,896 posts)let's not underestimate their desperation.
get the word out and secure the process.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)equality is naive.
ornotna
(10,798 posts)Having seen a post stating "all AA problems and institutional racism will disappear with more income
equality"
Could you post a link? Thanks.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)you just saw one.
ornotna
(10,798 posts)I am unable to read between the lines as well as you I guess.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And the responses.
You used up your quota of questions with me long ago.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)BBG
(2,530 posts)Fred
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Must be an allergy.
But not to straw, Fred likes his straw men.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Yeah, Fred says a lot of things that he can't back up.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Your straw men don't fly here, we're used to all the false arguments Clinton supporters spew.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I have never heard Bernie Sanders or any of his supporters make that claim. Could you please give us your source? Thanks in advance.
jalan48
(13,853 posts)to the high unemployment and poverty in black communities across the country. It's kind of the Democrat's version of trickle down I guess.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)You hit the nail right there.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)with Bernie supporters. It's really just a waste.
Wankle Ronnie
(66 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)I really think it's a waste of time and energy.
bvf
(6,604 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)are not going to tolerate a candidate badmouthing PBO. That's the reality. So given that issue, it's best not to engage.
bvf
(6,604 posts)that most AAs are in 100% agreement with everything Obama?
Oh, OK. Next time I need someone to tell me what "most AAs" think, I'll be sure to look you up.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)The AA community has not agreed with everything President Obama has done. In some cases, it was the policy itself, or its framework, or its timing or the manner of implementation. However, with that said, the AA community has a deep and abiding respect and love for President Obama. For seven years, the AA community has endured white fear, white hate, white paranoia, white ignorance, white jealousy and white violence regarding everything about President Obama. The keyword here is "white." Some Bernie supporters look like and talk like those who hate PBO.
The most offensive thing Bernie has said and often repeated is the LIE President Obama abandoned his coalition after he was elected and then re-elected. Bernie's supporters have repeated the same lie here many many times. If the lie was true, Bernie should have been able to capture the hearts and minds of the Obama coalition. He hasn't, he can't and he won't.
If a Bernie supporter misrepresents what PBO has done and is doing, I believe AA folks should HIT BACK HARD by exposing the lie with a link to the truth, using the hashtag #BernNotice. But ultimately I think the focus should be on reviewing, analyzing and commenting on Bernie's policy agenda and how he plans to implement it in a very dysfunctional hateful political environment. Then I think we should tweet and retweet our findings. This should be our focus instead of getting into twitter wars with people who are stuck somewhere in the Matrix.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)agrees in hindsight, has said is that Obama shouldn't have wasted time attempting to get Repugs on his side (who were clearly never going to cross over) and should have simply stuck to the truth of what he really wanted to do instead.
I, at least, and think many other DUers would agree that Obama actually did an amazing job in what he did get passed. We just wish he could have done even more and call out mistakes we see when they occur. That said, i still think he will go down in history as a rather amazing ad effectual President.
Bernie plans to use the FDR approach to getting the votes he needs instead of placating the far side. What he said wasn't meant to denigrate Obama but to highlight the way he would do things differently.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)She's bad-mouthed him more than any other Democratic candidate.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)in 2008. But she's family so if it's a choice between Bernie and Hillary, the majority will go with HRC. But if Biden gets in that would change because AA peeps see Biden as someone who has stood strong with PBO for 8 years adn that means a whole lot.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)while he was marching with MLK Hillary was working for Barry Goldwater, and you can't skew that fact as much as you might try, or you just didn't know, Well now You do.
stevil
(1,537 posts)Or you are mocking the article/writer.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Misogynist if it's Hillary's sycophants, Racist if referring to his record of support for racial equality or bringing up the Lie the BLM didn't protest Hillary because the room was filled , when it's a proven fact she made a deal, and as usual it was exposed and not forthcoming information that She gave, or BLM .
I read the link and it's one K-Street opinion, and Black politicians don't speak for all Black people, I make Calls for Bernie events and he has A lot of Minorities behind him, African Americans especially .
stevil
(1,537 posts)From the article:
The go-to defense for Sanderss supporters is to mention the candidates involvement in civil rights protests in the 1960s. The implication is that black Americans owe their votes to Sanders today because he did the right thing by support black Americans rights 60 years ago. This patronizing position not only assumes that black Americans are one-issue voters, but also that their one issue has been solved for five decades.
whathehell
(29,053 posts)in the case of Bernie or anyone else.
The only thing "owed," might be some respect and consideration.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)by supporting a candidate who uses Black dialect when speaking/pandering to Black audiences.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)is that he isn't Hillary Clinton, and Hillary Clinton supporters can't seem to accept the idea that Democrats could possibly support anybody except Hillary Clinton.
Daily there is a new attempt to come up with reasons why Bernie Sanders will fail, his supporters are lousy human beings and that the universe in general is against him.
Mostly, it's a daily reason to tell Bernie Sanders supporters to STFU and get on board the Hillary Clinton train.
We get that you don't like that we are enthusiastic about someone other than Hillary Clinton. We get that you would like for us to either shut up or get on board with Hillary.
But you know what? You are accomplishing the exact opposite of what you want because every baseless smear against his supporters, no less, just makes us dig in our heels and makes the Hillary Clinton campaign look petty.
But carry on, and see how it works out for you.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the attitudes of other Democrats. Almost all of us like Bernie and his message a lot. I am one of many who will be glad to vote for him if he progresses to the point where he can win in the general -- and have said so many times, seemingly all to deaf ears.
IMO, this thread is full of examples of Bernie supporters regarding fellow Democrats as opponents instead of allies. It may be that as Bernie campaigns in more states he will catch fire with larger populations and his candidacy rescued by large, new influxes of supporters.
Fingers crossed.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)telling Bernie Sanders supporters that they suck every day, day in, day out is counter productive.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)discuss this election, Aerows.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)every day that they are racist, obnoxious, etc. (and both of those things have been said REPEATEDLY) doesn't make them want to vote for Hillary Clinton.
I would have thought this is basic common sense, but apparently, it isn't if the amount of posts that say exactly this is any indication.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Some of the louder of your group have been complaining about Obama for over 6 years.
Not only am I not surprised, I predicted this reaction prior to the 2012 election when many of you were hoping for a primary of Obama.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I suggested on one post that Bernie supporters should want to appeal to the quiet readers who visit for information, rather than repelling them with right-wing-style attacks on other Democrats, and a response from one was that he "wasn't afraid of them." Gave up trying to figure that out real quick, but the notion that the enemy to be defeated is on the left, not the right, seems pretty typical of some.
If this behavior is spreading "out there," it may ultimately doom his candidacy. A left-wing version of the Tea Party is not the change people are looking for.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)We get it - you want us to either shut up about Sanders or support Hillary.
Sorry, primaries don't work that way. Sanders has earned my support.
Maybe Hillary Clinton, her campaign, and her supporters should work harder to earn the support of those Democrats that support Sanders by convincing us why we should support her instead of Bernie?
Obviously the "He can't win" route has been an epic fail, so why not tell us why we should support her instead?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)voting for Hillary. Your ball.
ornotna
(10,798 posts)That depending on how Aerows posts on this board will determine who you will vote for? Odd.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)seeing if we could bump it up to a little conversation. Good night.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Cosmocat
(14,561 posts)And I find I spend most of my time here gagging over what a lot of his "supporters" post.
It's right wingism (not HIS policy or how HE acts, but the tenor and tone of his supporters), gone left.
I have sort of conceded myself to the understanding that to win today this just might be the kind of fanatatical energy a candidate needs.
I just keep trying to focus on him.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)sit down with church and other conventional black leaders. The situation's quite different here, of course.
There's always schmuckery involved. I'm remembering some idiots calling for black women to do their part for the revolution by - quick - having babies, lots of babies. That went over REAL big.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Bernie supporters are. Bit late to the game with this he is.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Bernie's a racist. Got it.
Hey, AA's know who Bernie is, what his Civil Rights record is and how he would fight for them to have jobs, no more prisons for profits and would work his ass off for them. If they don't want someone who is genuinely concerned about their plight in life - go ahead and vote for More of the same Hillary! It's their life. Vote for Hillary!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)spent half the time they spend telling Bernie Sanders supporters how awful they are and how he can't win instead convincing us WHY we should support Hillary Clinton, they might get somewhere.
Tell us why you agree with her policies. Tell us why you think she is a superior candidate. Telling us we suck isn't going to win you many, if any, converts.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Bernie's correct on every single one and they know it.
Instead they resort to "Useless White Supremacist Liberal", his hair is messy, he and his supporters are racist, he hasn't done enough for the AA community. ("not good enough, Bernie" , he's racist, his crowds are too white, count the black people in the crowds, he's racist, he hangs with Cornel, so he hates Obama, he's racist...
It-will-never-stop, so the AA community should just vote for More of the same, Hillary. If that's what they want, have at it. They can have her!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)poisoning the waters with bullshit.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Her campaign now consists of three planks.
1. It's past time for a woman president
2. Bernie can't win the ge
3. Bernie's supporters are white supremacists
She loses on every single issue.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Though of course, this is all old news to us.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)As only one element, of course.
Whoops. Maybe I posted this at the wrong place, because didn't most of the combativeness toward AA start after criticism of Bernie?
Nevertheless, it just crossed my mind that simple possessiveness, or perhaps desire to control, might explain much of the rejection of people who actually like him, while ignoring distant enemies (GOP) who emphatically don't want a piece of him. AA here would be Democrat or leaning left also and thus might seem too close to the bone, or prize, for comfort.
Anything, or have I been breathing the air here too long?
Number23
(24,544 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)than discussion board participants proving that a particularly nasty impression of them is true.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I REFUSE TO VOTE FOR BERNIE SANDERS' SUPPORTERS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY, NOW!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)GOLDMAN SACHS FOR PREZZYDENT!!!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 23, 2015, 09:09 PM - Edit history (1)
Right now it's "Bernie's supporters are racists (or volvo drivers, dashiki wearing white dudes, communists, shoplifters, twitter trolls, stale egg mcmuffins, fill in the blank) and we are awfully concerned that they are alienating large swaths of minorities (or auto enthusiasts, dress shirt manufacturers, ayn rand devotees, mall security guards, other twitter trolls, mcdonalds customers, etc)"
in a few days it will switch back to "unelectable". Then it will be "why do you hate Hillary" or "Bernie's a cult leader". Then we'll get whatever other recycled meme of the day pops up.
This one has been through the wash what, 4 or 5 times now? I'm surprised they keep dragging it out, but I guess it's easier than talking about actual issues.
Which is sort of the bottom line with all this crap.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)The easiest way to approach elections is to listen, study, verify and ultimately use common sense....leave the hero worship to the fools...
No one and I mean Not one human being alive sits above reproach, anyone who puts - especially a politician on an unreachable pedestal deserves what gets thrown down on them....
sarge43
(28,941 posts)I'm wondering how the author knows all those tweets are from actual Sanders' supporters. I guess he didn't get the memo "On the internet you're anyone you want to be."
mopinko
(70,070 posts)he needs to speak up here.
i am a sanders supporter, but i have no problem w hillary.
but you cant take web activism good w/o dealing w the bad.
he is plugged in enough to take the initiative, and give his over the top supporters a tweak.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)expecting a candidate to take responsibility for "so called supporters" on the internet is beyond ridiculous. I saw some vile garbage on a forum bearing her name yesterday. Why aren't you calling for her to speak out as well?
mopinko
(70,070 posts)that's why. he has chosen this arena. he needs to figure out how to use it, and he should see what the problems are.
he is also the one who has taken a firm no personal attacks stance, since forever.
he is trying to change the landscape.
GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)this is juvenile.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)People are on to this crap. Last time they tried to smear Bernie he got $1.2 million in donations in just a few days.
Dirty politics by a desperate campaign. Big surprise.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Harrop is a right wing racist who called Obama an "exotic":
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=616086
And then there's the trifecta: calling Bernie a racist, anti-Semitism and using racial slurs:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251506371
I have more examples of how Hillary's supporters are her biggest problem here if you need them.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)He's just an all around terrible person who is trolling and somehow this gets blamed on Sanders supporters? This is just a complete falsehood, the writer of that article, and the OP should be ashamed.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Twitter's a weird place.
artislife
(9,497 posts)If by some chance h makes it to the GE, don't expect a lot of support....
I am almost back to my Super Tuesday levels of disgust with h and her minions.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Must admit, the Clinton political machine is running every play they can to bring down Bernie...
I ask you, do you really want to vote for a candidate (i.e. Clinton) who resorts to republican dirty tricks to win?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Use it - ahem - liberally
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)rehash of an earlier thread.
can you guys please get together and coordinate these "bernie supporters are the devil" threads?
my home page is getting very cluttered
thanks!
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)This is a good article
artislife
(9,497 posts)Because the reason they are crossing is
http://www.thenation.com/article/why-children-fleeing-central-america-will-not-stop-coming/
People seem to be able to cry for Syrians and others as long as they are going to countries in Europe. As a nation, we need to ask why children are coming up from south of the border. And the foreign policies our Sec. of State has been making over the years that has help create the environment.
Yeah, I listened to Rev. Wright and I was right there with him when he quoted Malcolm" The chickens are coming home to roost." That was and is the Truth.
Hillary is a part of the problem. I am looking for a better solution!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Of course!
How about that NDP though eh?
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)DrBulldog
(841 posts)"This patronizing position not only assumes that black Americans are one-issue voters, but also that their one issue has been solved for five decades."
You know absolutely nothing about the single solitary white guy who continually shows up quietly at open Black Congressional Caucus meetings YEAR AFTER YEAR.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)there's just so many bubbles to maintain these days
the author might not even BE a Clintonista-and-hang-the-consequences, but the trope of the "progressives have crippling race problems" is just too tempting
tomorrow they'll be condemning Sanders for being a straight guy with kids
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Oh those rascally Bernie supporters.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 23, 2015, 10:54 PM - Edit history (1)
Certainly not the DNC, the majority of American voters, or our future female Commander-in-chief. Thankfully, Sanders has such minimal viability America's candidate won't have to debate fantasy world nonsense more than six times.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Coz there are far more supporters here than my hands could hold:
PatrickforO
(14,569 posts)That's the thing. This russian starr might very well be a troll paid a nice shiny nickel for every tweet.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Next You Tube for the finer points of String Theory
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)PatrickforO
(14,569 posts)See, here's the point. We have an OP with one guy posting derogatory, racist things and all of a sudden we have trouble with ALL Bernie supporters. Gee. So...THIS apple is green, so ALL apples are green. That's a fallacy, and that fact is my point.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)My badly stated point is to begin with how do we verify it's even an apple? It could be a lime. We can't test the premise and neither could the author.
Elaborating on my snark, 140 character message really doesn't allow for detail. It almost begs for a hit and run, ie trolling. How many of those messages are troll's or Sanders supporters being jerks, unless a master hacker gets to work, no way of knowing.
Flawed premise and insufficient data.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)mak3cats
(1,573 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)a Sanders supporter cutting that tag off of her mattress that you're not supposed to cut off. No shame! None!
Regards,
TWM
NRaleighLiberal
(60,013 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)given some of the information I have seen here.
PatrickforO
(14,569 posts)'fed' this information here. Because one guy on twitter does not all Bernie supporters besmirch. I'm thinking SOMEONE or SOME GROUP of people are using a pretty darned big brush.
Or am I wrong here?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)While I think WAPO is mostly full of it in their articles. The picked up on this not for just one complaint but for many. At least as I understand it from people who have had their FB pages attacked, Twitter accounts attacked, etc...
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)the very people they support.
Bernie needs to address this in a very public way to stop the bleeding with PoC, if that's possible at this late date.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)the very people they support.
Hillary needs to address this in a very public way to stop the bleeding with all potential voters, if that's possible at this late date.
Vinca
(50,255 posts)Like Hillary's emails, if you beat the drum long enough and loud enough people will believe the story.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)conventional supporters over time, if that may solve most of this potentially grave problem all by itself. Most of the public does not know Bernie exists and doesn't visit political sites, so perhaps those who say this is of little note are right.
Thinking about it strategically, I'm wondering if Bernie's bringing this up publicly would be a mistake, no matter how well done. It would for sure draw a lot more attention to undesirable behavior among some of his supporters at a time when Bernie is trying to broaden his appeal. I'm guessing it would have absolutely no effect on their behavior. As it continued, any coverage would be to the effect that he could not control his own supporters. And, of course, it might offend those supporters to no purpose.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)It has gotten so bad that even major newspapers are drawing attention to it. After what happened to Howard Dean, I am not surprised. But you are right, if Bernie addresses it publically, it gives credibility to vitriol and it won't stop anyway.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)most people don't read newspapers either.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Maybe 55.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)of chatting across our big breakfast table as we passed sheets around and pushed each other's out of the way is long gone.
We have our screens, with far, far more information, continually updated, but it's not the same, probably in part because you can never feel you've actually finished. We take the NY Times on line now, and I just realized that I never close my tablet with the satisfaction folding up the paper once held.
whathehell
(29,053 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)I'm not sure what that means.
jalan48
(13,853 posts)"Bernie, you're a great guy but your supporters are terrible. America, can we afford to have a President who's supporters are obnoxious?"
brooklynite
(94,483 posts)I like Bernie and his policies. But I think he'll be massively outspent by the Democratic, and platitudes like "the 99% will rise up" don't provide a convincing alternative. Money isn't the only think you need, but it is a threshold item.
djean111
(14,255 posts)whathehell
(29,053 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)that Bernie poses.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Just tell me that much.
I'll tell you what... anyone who would is an idiot is what I think.
MoveIt
(399 posts)the wyldwolf should know