Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHuffPo: Bernie Sanders's Revolutionary Politics -- And Why He Could Win
Bernie Sanders's Revolutionary Politics -- And Why He Could WinPundits see endorsements by influential party members (congress members and governors in particular) as the most reliable indicator of a candidate's chances to win the nomination. And while Clinton's endorsements are already in the hundreds, Sanders hasn't secured a single one. Officially, the reason is that Sanders is just too liberal to win the White House and Clinton is better positioned for the general elections. Yet, the exact opposite may be argued: Sanders's populist proposals -- tuition-free public universities, single-payer healthcare, a $15 minimum wage -- would most likely attract millions of disillusioned voters back to the polls, including independents and moderate Republicans.
Clinton, on the other hand, an establishment figurehead embroiled in controversies and committed to the country's financial elite, would dissuade many from voting. The lack of endorsement for Sanders is probably better explained by the fact that his anti-establishment positioning threatens Democratic figures. After all, if his proposal to move toward public funding of elections is implemented, the political map of the United States would be shattered and many Democrats currently in office could lose their jobs to more populist candidates.
As Sanders gains increased visibility through an army of volunteers canvassing the streets and the upcoming democratic debates, and as his proposals -- notably his expansive take on racial justice -- become known to the public, catching up with Clinton nationally is fast becoming a realistic prospect.
Bernie Sanders has called his campaign a "political revolution." The strength of his populist message, the resounding popularity of his proposals, and the staggering success of his grassroots organizing suggest that, in fact, a revolution is underway.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 726 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HuffPo: Bernie Sanders's Revolutionary Politics -- And Why He Could Win (Original Post)
portlander23
Sep 2015
OP
aidbo
(2,328 posts)1. The Un-electable argument has always failed to convince me.
You win elections by inspiring people to vote for you.
As Bernie told the DNC; the republicans didn't win the last mid-term, the democrats lost.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)2. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)3. K&R nt
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)4. Slowly but surely the narrative has been changing.
It's been pretty amazing so far to see how this movement has grown.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)5. The money paragraph there is
Clinton, on the other hand, an establishment figurehead embroiled in controversies and committed to the country's financial elite, would dissuade many from voting. The lack of endorsement for Sanders is probably better explained by the fact that his anti-establishment positioning threatens Democratic figures. After all, if his proposal to move toward public funding of elections is implemented, the political map of the United States would be shattered and many Democrats currently in office could lose their jobs to more populist candidates.