Chris Cilliza blocks media critic on Twitter

[twii]

Chris Cilliza, whose video segment in the Washington Post was cancelled a few years ago for calling Hillary Clinton a bitch (along with Dana Milbank), has blocked journalism professor and media critic Jay Rosen on Twitter. Rosen has criticized Cilliza's flawed coverage of the Clinton emails.

https://twitter.com/EricBoehlert/status/647499472017207296

[Cheese Sandwich]

1. Inside inside inside politics

[dsc]

2. Would a reporter who called Obama a

racially based name still be permitted to cover him? Or what if a reporter called Sanders an anti Semitic name, would he or she still be covering Sanders? Why is Cilliza still permitted to cover Clinton?

[Jesus Malverde]

3. Lol

Blocking someone on Twitter is like adding someone to an ignore list.

Slow news day!

[twii]

7. Two DU nicknames ignoring each other vs. A mainstream journalist blocking on Twitter

The nicknames are not important because nobody knows them. Journalists blocking media critics if important, unless you are not fond of Hillary, in which case you will have motivation to downplay embarrassing behavior from Hillary hating gossip pseudojournalists.

[snooper2]

4. THIS IS HUGH!

[AtomicKitten]

5. Dana Milbank was banned from KO's Countdown.

Milbank apparently reported an Obama quote out of context, and KO wasn't having the gratuitous snark. They kissed and made up later.

[mcar]

6. He is a tool

[DemocratSinceBirth]

8. lol

Brian XXXXXXX <[e-mail]>
Aug 21

to chris.cillizza
When I read that you went to an elite prep school everything you write makes sense.

Have a nice weekend.


Cillizza, Chris <[e-mail]>
Aug 21

to me
Thanks for reading!
Chris Cillizza
The Fix
@thefix

[Dawson Leery]

9. Cilliza is about as objective as Ron Fournier and Jennifer Rubin.

[cyberswede]

10. Who gives a shit who blocks whom on Twitter?

What a waste of energy.