Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:19 PM Sep 2015

Stating and arguing an opinion about Bernie Sanders' chances is not a "smear."

It is good and healthy to have a debate. It is no "smear" to think, for very good reasons, that a self-described socialist has little to no chance of being nominated. It is a stated opinion and one well-shared. All the odds makers agree. Most of the professional pundits and statisticians like Nate Silver agree. Bernie is a wonderful guy. But a self-described socialist can not, in my view based on the traditions of our nation and our politics, win the US presidency. He will be BAKED by the R's attack machine ads. We will hear "socialist socialist socialist" day and night. This is not a "socialist" nation, like it or not. Sorry, but Bernie as prez most likely will not happen. If anyone can make a serious argument to the contrary by all means go ahead. And please make sure to include our long political and cultural history in this country.

89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stating and arguing an opinion about Bernie Sanders' chances is not a "smear." (Original Post) RBInMaine Sep 2015 OP
You know what they say about opinions... The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #1
"everybody to the left of _____ is a socialist" left-of-center2012 Sep 2015 #61
I left the Republican party because they became crazy FormerRepublicanNow Oct 2015 #88
I don't believe it's a smear. Bernie's chances aren't that great, as things stand today. TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #2
"socialist socialist socialist" day and night would bore the living hell out of Americans virtualobserver Sep 2015 #3
We heard that "socialist" thing about Obama, too. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #7
we even re-elected a socialist virtualobserver Sep 2015 #10
Many Sanders supporters label Obama a corporatist bent on destroying middle class. Hoyt Sep 2015 #33
+1000 Capn Sunshine Oct 2015 #80
Obama is not a socialist-Bernie is redstateblues Sep 2015 #63
Why does anyone have to answer this? djean111 Sep 2015 #4
Agreed. Everyone should just go pffft and move on to other threads. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #8
+ 100000000000000 jkbRN Sep 2015 #37
Exactly. Thank you. AtomicKitten Oct 2015 #79
Neither is pointing out LWolf Sep 2015 #5
The attack ads would be worrisome. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #6
Over 50 person here. Supporting Bernie. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #9
I'm 67, a baby boomer SheilaT Oct 2015 #76
The attack ads against Hillary won't be any prettier if she wins the nomination. liberal_at_heart Sep 2015 #36
Bingo. SheilaT Oct 2015 #78
No matter who, the attacks will be vicious and desperate Capn Sunshine Oct 2015 #81
Agreed. I still haven't come across a coherent argument as to why he stands a chance in the GE. DanTex Sep 2015 #11
Here's one that will probably be ignored Krytan11c Sep 2015 #17
Bernie's had no oppo research or attack ads run against him at all. Hillary has been the target DanTex Sep 2015 #18
Why not, if he's so utterly attackable for being a SOCIALIST? The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #19
Because he's only run in Vermont. DanTex Sep 2015 #24
Because it makes no sense to spend the money at this point. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #26
For Bernie to win would only require Krytan11c Sep 2015 #20
Like I said, I still haven't heard a viable argument. "I'm pretty sure" doesn't qualify. DanTex Sep 2015 #25
Do you follow the news? Krytan11c Sep 2015 #28
Obama didn't call himself a socialist. Big difference. DanTex Sep 2015 #30
As if Krytan11c Sep 2015 #39
Exactly. The "socialist" canard is a non-starter. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #31
Socialism will be a big deal in the GE redstateblues Sep 2015 #64
Desperate Hillary Supporter (DHS) (tm) post alert! TheProgressive Sep 2015 #42
Ignoring the huge elephant in the room-he's Jewish Capn Sunshine Oct 2015 #83
I doubt that would make a difference. Socialist is a serious detriment to electability though. DanTex Oct 2015 #86
And countering an argument like that.. aidbo Sep 2015 #12
K & R SunSeeker Sep 2015 #13
Multiple red scare troll posts in a single day. PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #14
"I have here in my hand a list of names of DUers who support Sanders..." The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #15
It's red baiting. And, nothing new. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #16
It may not be a smear but it should not be taken as fact. First of all it is an opinion, an opinion liberal_at_heart Sep 2015 #21
Wow, twice in the same day corkhead Sep 2015 #22
You posted an earlier OP with a similar theme, cheapdate Sep 2015 #23
Let me begin by HDSam Sep 2015 #27
I feel the same way! wendylaroux Sep 2015 #58
Pretty sure I'd like to hear "socialist! socialist! socialist!" all day and night rather than "LIAR" cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #29
If cries of "SOCIALIST!!!" and other forms of red-baiting The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #34
Nothing makes me laugh so hard as reading "Ooooh, they're going to be so MEAN to Bernie!" cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #38
She's got more baggage than you'd find in the cargo compartment of a 747. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2015 #40
Stating An Unfounded Opinion Becomes A Self-fulfilling Meme - But That Is The Point - Is It Not cantbeserious Sep 2015 #32
Crickets.. orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #41
It distracts from the issues, the substance instead of the sports page . orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #35
You are trying to be logical. You need to stop it. JoePhilly Sep 2015 #43
I'm amazed how well he has borne the constant chatter saying this karynnj Sep 2015 #44
Thank you! I am bookmarking this thread. Jim Lane Sep 2015 #45
K & R, good post. Thinkingabout Sep 2015 #46
I am a Republican for Bernie Sanders. Bernievoter Sep 2015 #47
Glad To Have You On Board - Agree On The 1% - Bad For All cantbeserious Sep 2015 #49
Please stay,, this place needs the Open minded people required to protect Democracy !!!! orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #53
Right on wendylaroux Sep 2015 #59
A Republican who supports Bernie has only one reason treestar Sep 2015 #69
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #75
538 thnought Webb would be the anti-Hillary jfern Sep 2015 #48
I can understand people thinking that Hillary's got this... ReallyIAmAnOptimist Sep 2015 #50
DU is la-la land. Wishful thinking passes for "expert" analysis. Reality is discouraged. n/t Lil Missy Sep 2015 #51
You have expertise in this Field, I could tell by Your avatar . orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #55
With all due respect TBF Sep 2015 #52
Yes - The Meme Has Become A Chorus - Head From One Particular Durection - Fascinating cantbeserious Sep 2015 #54
The way you stated this previously was insulting. Armstead Sep 2015 #56
Common now at least be honest, Sanders is a Democratic Socialist NOT a socialist.. AuntPatsy Sep 2015 #57
Of course that is not a smear. How much the socialist label hurts him Vattel Sep 2015 #60
Arguing implies receiving opposition..... daleanime Sep 2015 #62
IMO DianeK Sep 2015 #65
Any comment about Bernie that is not positive redstateblues Sep 2015 #66
Well... malokvale77 Sep 2015 #67
If you think there is no difference between redstateblues Sep 2015 #70
It's being called a smear now? treestar Sep 2015 #68
This is exactly what the Sanders campaign is doing. delrem Sep 2015 #71
We've heard "socialist, socialist, socialist" about Obama for 8 years ibegurpard Sep 2015 #72
If one wants to remain chained to popular opinion, no matter how false..... highprincipleswork Sep 2015 #73
red baiting bullshit is red baiting bullshit is Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #74
I do not see it as a smear. Sanders uses that descriptor riversedge Oct 2015 #77
You might to notice how many more people SheilaT Oct 2015 #82
Same shit, Different day. 99Forever Oct 2015 #84
So why is it if a smear if we are talking about Hillary's chances ? Autumn Oct 2015 #85
Come back with your opinions once you figure out how to get Democrats elected in your own state. frylock Oct 2015 #87
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #89

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
1. You know what they say about opinions...
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:23 PM
Sep 2015

And while we might hear "socialist, socialist, socialist" about Bernie from the GOPers, we would hear "Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi" and "email, email, email" about Hillary, with a soupçon of Vince Foster. And, as far as they are concerned, everybody to the left of Darth Vader is a socialist. Which would include Hillary, maybe.

 
88. I left the Republican party because they became crazy
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:10 PM
Oct 2015

I planned on voting for Hillary because she is the most experienced candidate to ever run and she would break the glass ceiling. But since I have been here I met Bernie. He has done something that Hillary never did, he gave me hope and faith that things could change in this country for the better. My vote for Hillary was to prevent things from becoming worse, my vote for Bernie would be so that things become better.

Bernie and his movement fuse Tom Joad from the Grapes of Wrath and Jefferson Smith from Mr Smith goes to Washington. He is exactly what this country needs now. I am tired of being a cynic and I want to believe in my country and its government. Bernie can do that. Hillary has my head, but Bernie has my heart. I am well on my way of changing my mind and supporting him, especially after the speech he gave at Liberty University, it took real courage to go into the lion's den and brought tears to my eyes.

I seem to not be the only one who is going thru this process. The more people know Bernie the stronger he becomes. I for one, am willing to take a chance and vote for a possible dream, even if I risk the crazies taking over.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
2. I don't believe it's a smear. Bernie's chances aren't that great, as things stand today.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:25 PM
Sep 2015

It's rational to expect he won't be President. Also, Martin O'Malley's chances, not that great. It is what it is.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
3. "socialist socialist socialist" day and night would bore the living hell out of Americans
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:28 PM
Sep 2015

anyone who thinks that this strategy will work has no respect for the intelligence of the American people.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
7. We heard that "socialist" thing about Obama, too.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:32 PM
Sep 2015

And look how that worked out.

Americans won't elect a socialist/black guy/socialist black guy whose middle name is Hussein/socialist black guy whose middle name is Hussein and who was a community organizer, the GOPers (and some Dems) said. Strangely, they did, twice.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
80. +1000
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:35 PM
Oct 2015

One of the annoying things about Sanders supporters is they see corporations as really really bad. Without exception or consideration.

The other one is how many of them have been relentlessly attacking the President for the past seven years.

It makes it hard to like their candidate, given that so many of his DU surrogates here have been in "attack" mode since 2008.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. Why does anyone have to answer this?
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:29 PM
Sep 2015

You have been posting this same screed for quite a long time. No one is going to do as you say and stop supporting Bernie.
In fact, many of us feel that Hillary has too much baggage to win.
Be that as it may, none of us has to justify support of Bernie to anyone whatsoever. You have read the posts where we talk about issues. Issues are important to people.

I am sorry that you cannot accept that not even one person will stop supporting Bernie and start supporting another candidate because you say to do so. It evidently is galling, but you need to accept it.
And - if we Bernie supporters are so insignificant, than I really fail to understand why you bother with this.

Edited to add - no, you do not want a debate. You want acquiescence and agreement. That is really all you want. And you will not get it. Sorry.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
8. Agreed. Everyone should just go pffft and move on to other threads.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:34 PM
Sep 2015

Let them have their echo chamber.

I'm going to find a positive thread about Bernie and kick and rec it for the op.

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
6. The attack ads would be worrisome.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:30 PM
Sep 2015

And I agree, Bernie is a great guy. The huge majority of the over 50 crowd hears socialism and they're just not having it. And the more worrisome part is that the over 50 crowd seems to be the only ones that vote consistently.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
9. Over 50 person here. Supporting Bernie.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:34 PM
Sep 2015

You'd be surprised how many old progressives there are out here - people who aren't the least put off by "socialism." When I went to anti-Iraq war demonstrations almost all I saw was other old people. Don't assume everyone over 50 is conservative, because we aren't. I am getting a bit tired of all the red-baiting, though.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
76. I'm 67, a baby boomer
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:33 PM
Oct 2015

and I don't find the "socialist" label to be off-putting.

It's really the prior generation, the WWII people, who are rapidly departing this earth, who conflate all socialism with Communism, which was always a pretty ignorant thing to do.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
81. No matter who, the attacks will be vicious and desperate
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:38 PM
Oct 2015

But they will get a lot of help from the surrogates of each side in the primaries, that's for sure.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
11. Agreed. I still haven't come across a coherent argument as to why he stands a chance in the GE.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:35 PM
Sep 2015

It basically comes down to, Bernie is so great that he will usher in an unprecedented transformation of the electorate.

This election is too important to put in the hands of the Easter Bunny. The GOP is real and horrible. What matters is winning next November, and the person to do that is not a self-described socialist.

Maybe in another 20 years a socialist will be viable. But not right now.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
17. Here's one that will probably be ignored
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:54 PM
Sep 2015

Bernie Sanders crushes Hillary's favorable/unfavorable rating among independents. In case you didn't know the majority of Americans are independents, they are the group that decides elections. Having faith in Hillary Clinton to win over independents is like believing in the Easter Bunny.

"This election is too important to put in the hands of the Easter Bunny. The GOP is real and horrible. What matters is winning next November&quot You), and the person to do that is not a candidate who is unfavorable with the group of Americans that determine elections.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
18. Bernie's had no oppo research or attack ads run against him at all. Hillary has been the target
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:59 PM
Sep 2015

of the GOP for decades, and she's still standing strong, beating basically all of them in GE polls. Once the GOP starts going to work on Bernie, he's toast. He can't dodge the socialist label because he claims it. He's further left than anyone who has won anything major outside of a small number of very liberal states. Not to mention the fact that he doesn't have nearly the fundraising capacity to fight back.

For Bernie to win would require nothing less than a major transformation of the electorate. Right now 53% of Americans wouldn't even consider voting for a socialist, even if they liked the candidate. Yes, theoretically he could win, in the "anything can happen" sense. But beyond a Hail Mary, he's got nothing.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
19. Why not, if he's so utterly attackable for being a SOCIALIST?
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:08 PM
Sep 2015

Why haven't there been attack ads? If the SOCIALIST thing is so awful why doesn't Hillary run a few ads and take him out now?

Maybe because most people who aren't GOPers and teabaggers don't care and it wouldn't work?

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
20. For Bernie to win would only require
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:08 PM
Sep 2015

Him securing the Democratic nomination. Fundraising isn't everything, and when the opposition only has one attack to throw at you it is very easy to counter punch.

Example: "BERNIE SANDERS IS A dun dun dun SOCIALIST!!!!!"

Response: "Yes, I support socialist positions such as expanded social security, a right to healthcare, and an increased minimum wage."

I am pretty sure the majority of Americans will like and support Bernie once they get a chance to hear him.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
28. Do you follow the news?
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:17 PM
Sep 2015

The republican media classifies every Democrat as a socialist, it's a played out argument. It really doesn't matter if they play an ad with Bernie calling himself a Socialist. They played multiple ads of Pres. Obama saying he wanted to fundamentally transform America. He was still elected twice.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
39. As if
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:38 PM
Sep 2015

As if that one phrase matters once the RW media does its spin.
Maybe I'm wrong though, Bernie saying he's a socialist obviously has had a large effect on you.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
31. Exactly. The "socialist" canard is a non-starter.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:18 PM
Sep 2015

Bernie has never denied that he's a "democratic socialist" (not a Marxist or anything of the sort) who advocates for something like the government safety nets of the Scandinavian countries. All he has to do is keep talking about protecting Social Security and Medicare, raising the minimum wage, eliminating for-profit prisons and breaking up the big banks that almost ruined the economy, and people will understand that he's not the son of Leon Trotsky but a guy who's got ideas for helping the 99%.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
42. Desperate Hillary Supporter (DHS) (tm) post alert!
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:52 PM
Sep 2015

Sanders has the best chance of winning the Presidency as even republicans
will vote for him... No republican will ever vote for Clinton.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
83. Ignoring the huge elephant in the room-he's Jewish
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:50 PM
Oct 2015

I have no problem with this, but historically, have we even had a Jewish nominee before? The closest was Joe Lieberman on the Gore ticket.

I think the argument can be forwarded that there was very little anti-semitism directed towards Lieberman. So it may be a non- issue.

Hopefully, the USA has come far enough in the past seven years that "Socialist" is the big popular attack, and religion is a non issue in 2016.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
86. I doubt that would make a difference. Socialist is a serious detriment to electability though.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 04:32 PM
Oct 2015

Jewish polls about the same as catholic, woman, black, hispanic, which is to say a few bigots won't vote for such a candidate, but those people aren't voting for Democrats anyway.

 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
12. And countering an argument like that..
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 08:36 PM
Sep 2015

..with a concern about the electability of Hillary Clinton because of the email thing is also not a smear.

Not saying the email thing has any merit, just saying it hurts her electability.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
21. It may not be a smear but it should not be taken as fact. First of all it is an opinion, an opinion
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:09 PM
Sep 2015

based on presumption which tries to predict future events. I heard the exact same argument against Obama here on DU by Hillary supporters in 2008. No one can predict who is going to win. Of course I don't base my vote on electability anyway. I vote based on platform and voting record, and for me that means voting for Bernie Sanders.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
22. Wow, twice in the same day
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:10 PM
Sep 2015

You have convinced me. I am no longer for the self avowed democratic socialist and I am switching to the neoliberal corporatist republican-lite candidate because that's what Americans really want.

Got it!

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
23. You posted an earlier OP with a similar theme,
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:11 PM
Sep 2015

and despite a great many replies, I didn't notice where you had even once participated in the discussion that followed. So far in this thread, it seems you've also declined to participate in any discussion.

That seems a little unusual to me.

HDSam

(251 posts)
27. Let me begin by
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:15 PM
Sep 2015

saying I haven't always voted straight democrat or republican. I am, or more correctly, was, a swing voter, your typical centrist. I've generally viewed our elections as a means of choosing the lesser of two evils and am sick and tired of it.

I attended Bernie's rally (my very first political rally) at the University of Nevada Reno and was very impressed, impressed enough to hand over my hard-earned money to buy a t-shirt with his name on it. I have never, in the 28 years I've been eligible to vote, purchased ANYTHING that even hinted at a party/candidate affiliation.

Bernie is the one candidate in all these years that I feel I can vote for without compromising.

So a sample size of one doesn't mean anything, but I'm not the only one I know that is enthusiastic about finally having a candidate we can feel good about voting for.



wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
58. I feel the same way!
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:49 PM
Sep 2015

I heard him on c-span years ago and loved him then.
Totally excited about his run for prez.!!
I am an old lady,it takes quite a bit to excite me these days,

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
29. Pretty sure I'd like to hear "socialist! socialist! socialist!" all day and night rather than "LIAR"
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:18 PM
Sep 2015

So you say they're coming after Bernie with an oven to BAKE him with. Well let me tell you they'd come after Hillary Clinton with a FLAMETHROWER and NUCLEAR BOMBS.

If you think one word sinks Bernie Sanders and have no fear of the fact Hillary Clinton carries enough baggage to fill a fucking freight train, I'm afraid your blinders are on so tight they're becoming part of your anatomy.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
34. If cries of "SOCIALIST!!!" and other forms of red-baiting
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:21 PM
Sep 2015

and hippie-bashing are all they've got, they sure haven't got much.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
38. Nothing makes me laugh so hard as reading "Ooooh, they're going to be so MEAN to Bernie!"
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:30 PM
Sep 2015

The reality is when it comes to Hillary Clinton the GOP won't be simply mean, they'll wage thermonuclear war.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
40. She's got more baggage than you'd find in the cargo compartment of a 747.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:39 PM
Sep 2015

Some of it isn't fair, but that doesn't mean it isn't out there. They won't stop with Benghazi and email; they'll dredge up all the bullshit from when Bill was president, including but not limited to Vince Foster. I'm sure she knows it's coming. But it's both hilarious and lame to say Bernie isn't a viable candidate because he'll be called a socialist. Indeed, the fact that he self-identifies as a "Democratic socialist" goes a long way to take power away from the word. He gets right on top of it and explains exactly what that means, and so far the message is catching on. It's like, "Yeah, I'm a socialist. So what? If it means I support Social Security, Medicare, single-payer health insurance, a livable minimum wage, and higher taxes on corporations and billionaires, I plead guilty."

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
35. It distracts from the issues, the substance instead of the sports page .
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:21 PM
Sep 2015

Polls, Polls AND MORE Polls, no Policies .

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
43. You are trying to be logical. You need to stop it.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:54 PM
Sep 2015

Well, you need to stop if you want to understand why some of Bernie's supporters get upset when you say things like this.

Many of DU's loudest and angriest Sanders supporters were demanding a primary of Obama in 2012. Some of them seemed sure it would happen. Sure, they had no candidate. But it was going to happen.

They've spent the last 6+ years making predictions about evil things Obama would do ... only to have those predictions fail. Have they become even sightly more introspective, nope.

They've just gotten more angry ... as if their predictions had actually came true.

And so now ... they can't imagine Bernie losing. They think they can call Hillary supporters names, and those same people will just switch to Bernie.

We're Bernie to win the Dem nomination, he'd actually need a strategy to deal with the issue you mention. Sadly, many of his most disgruntled DU supporters do not think so. The idea that this issue would effect people is an offense to them. How dare you even mention it.

These folks have been wrong a lot over the last 6+ years. And they wear it like a badge of honor.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
44. I'm amazed how well he has borne the constant chatter saying this
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:57 PM
Sep 2015

He has remained cheerful and simply continued his issue oriented campaign and enjoying the large rallies that seem to happen wherever he goes.

PS the wording is an intentional copy of something said of his opponent.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
45. Thank you! I am bookmarking this thread.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:13 PM
Sep 2015

It's part of the whole pattern of the double standard of Clinton supporters.

You write:

Stating and arguing an opinion about Bernie Sanders' chances is not a "smear."


I agree.

I'll add: Stating and arguing an opinion about Hillary Clinton's chances is not a "smear" either.

As we all know, however, anyone who mentions a factor that would hurt Clinton in the general election, if she's the nominee, is accused of Hillary-hating, Hillary-bashing, and, of course, posting right-wing memes.

How well each candidate would do as President is the most important consideration, but it's also worth asking how each would do as the Democratic nominee. My point is that it's worth asking about Clinton as well as about Sanders. What's sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose.
 

Bernievoter

(2 posts)
47. I am a Republican for Bernie Sanders.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:21 PM
Sep 2015

This will probably be my only post. I have been reading DU for years. I am in NC and there are lots of us Republicans for Bernie in the Tarheel State. We are excited about Bernie because we are tired of this country being run by the 1% and the rest of us have no say any more. Bernie is the real deal. The Republicans DO NOT want to face Bernie in 2016. Bernie has no baggage except for being called a Socialist by the Hillary camp, which means nothing in this day and age. You can bet if Hillary gets the nomination with all her baggage, a fire will be built under every republican and they will be coming out in droves to vote against her, no matter who the republicans nominate.
I and other republicans that support Bernie will work overtime getting as many people as we can to the polls to keep her out of the White House. This is the time for a new start for America and a candidate like Bernie Sanders doesn't come around often. Let's not blow it. Thanks.

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
59. Right on
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:56 PM
Sep 2015

I know many republicans around my small town who are for Bernie also.
He appeals to a huge span of Americans.Thanks for posting.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
69. A Republican who supports Bernie has only one reason
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 11:56 PM
Sep 2015

That's the one you want to run against in the GE.

How can you be a Republican and support Bernie? He stands for things you cannot stand when much milder things come from Obama or Hillary.

Response to treestar (Reply #69)

50. I can understand people thinking that Hillary's got this...
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:28 PM
Sep 2015

We can all argue for our opinions.

Most pundits also thought BO DIDN'T have a chance against Hillary. Then people argued that he'd never win the general, or be re-elected.

All the arguments against Bernie sound like the exact same thing to me. Some people's brains affix themselves to "this is the way it is" scenarios, and others are able to think outside the box. Elections are dynamic and uncontrollable. We've never been here before.

People are sick and tired of the establishment politicians. They're sick and tired of crumbs for the middle class and poor while corporations get billions in tax breaks and pay no taxes... They're sick and tired of you name it, structural racism, police violence, war war and more war, privacy violations, wrecking the environment, banksters not going to jail, trade deals that strip human rights, etc., etc., etc.

So while I can understand people thinking that Hillary's got this (especially from folks that aren't political junkies) I don't agree. From the moment Bernie announced he would run as Dem I was excited. And so far my expectations have been exceeded, and so far there's no evidence of Bernie's popularity leveling off. His popularity is like a wild fire. Even if Hillary decided to adopt 100% of Bernie's platform Bernie would still win because HRC doesn't come across as authentic or trustworthy, but as a basic politician who's goal is being elected rather than solving the problems that Bernie has been talking about for years. Never mind all Hillary's political baggage (mostly nonsense) that the right loves to hate. HRC's stars just aren't aligning.

If you're open minded enough to read the best description of why Bernie's the more likely nominee see this: http://www.secularnirvanablog.com/what-the-pundits-and-experts-fail-to-understand-about-the-bernie-sanders-phenomenon/

And also keep your eye on the trendlines at HuffPost Pollster: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary

TBF

(32,056 posts)
52. With all due respect
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:32 PM
Sep 2015

your pundits and odd-makers need to get out a little

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251624116 --> photos of crowds supporting Bernie

The only place I'm hearing "socialist, socialist, socialist" is with disdain from supporters of Hillary. And I'm a person who likes to talk about that particular economic system.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
56. The way you stated this previously was insulting.
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:37 PM
Sep 2015

Saying people who support Sanders live in "fantasy land" and otehr choice phrases were not likely to start a reasoned discussion.

Now in response to this -- You are asking to prove a negative. No one know how much difference the "socialist" label would make. It is a right wing meme, whether said by a GOP or a Democrat.

The US may not be officially Socialist (Trademark) but it does have a strong Liberal/Progressive/Populist heritage. What are his positions and proposals? Basically Liberal/Progressive, with a strongly populist orientation. The positions he espouses are widely popular.

Can he be elected? Nothing is certain. But any claims that he is "unelectable" is bullshit. His record of overwhelming victory repeatedly speaks for itself. And that includes support from all segments, including moderates and conservatives.

AuntPatsy

(9,904 posts)
57. Common now at least be honest, Sanders is a Democratic Socialist NOT a socialist..
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 10:48 PM
Sep 2015

Big difference, huge.....

At this point I await the debates, still not fully decided, and for your reading pleasure, a bit of American History -

http://billmoyers.com/2015/07/03/social-democracy-is-100-american/

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
60. Of course that is not a smear. How much the socialist label hurts him
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 11:05 PM
Sep 2015

depends on how he defines "socialist."

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
62. Arguing implies receiving opposition.....
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 11:21 PM
Sep 2015

you don't like opposition?

It's kind of necessary. Have a lovely evening.

 

DianeK

(975 posts)
65. IMO
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 11:52 PM
Sep 2015

it's a good thing that the American people have more intellect than you give them credit for...he is a democratic socialist..as am i ..as anyone who travels on our roads or sends their kids to public schools or avail themselves to all the many social programs we have in this country..the red baiting no longer works..so come on...knock it off..we are too smart for this!

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
67. Well...
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 11:54 PM
Sep 2015

according to the odds makers, a black man with a foreign sounding name could not win.

I don't think you have a clue what the common folk are looking for.

We all think of Hillary right there with every RepubliCON.

That's my argument, including our long political and cultural history.

We are fed up.

Enough is enough.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
70. If you think there is no difference between
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 12:13 AM
Sep 2015

Hillary and the Republican jokers running for their nomination you need to find some other sources besides DU. There is a huge difference. As far as knowing what the common folk are looking for you need to come down and spend some time in TN.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
71. This is exactly what the Sanders campaign is doing.
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 12:35 AM
Sep 2015

You, perhaps, have not been listening.

But others have.

We are talking about the viability of universal health care.
We are talking about the viability of universal education.

These are universal social programs, tested out in several successful countries, and are the wave of the future for that reason.

Moreover, we are talking about the viability of peace.

We would immediately put all war profiteers out of business, if not in jail.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
72. We've heard "socialist, socialist, socialist" about Obama for 8 years
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 01:32 AM
Sep 2015

We'll hear it about Hillary too. Difference is no one has been hating Bernie for 20 plus years and he actually excites people.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
73. If one wants to remain chained to popular opinion, no matter how false.....
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 01:53 AM
Sep 2015

If one wants to remain chained to popular opinion, no matter how false and misguided, there really is no hope for a happy life.

This country has been inundated with the worst kind of falsehoods and downright stupidity since the days of Ronald Raygun. Can you imagine an entire political party signing oaths of allegiance to a philosophy invented by a thirteen year old? That would be the Republican Party, pledging allegiance to the views of thirteen year old Grover Norquist, who imagined not paying any taxes. Yeah, like a thirteen year old or other child would!

And for many years now the media has been in the pocket of the same intellectual dishonesty and false thinking.

Now, there is someone who doesn't follow that pattern - Bernie Sanders. The false label of Socialism means nothing in the face of what he really says, does, and stands for. And people respond to this. In their hearts. In their minds. With their bodies.

That is why this is a movement.

So, please, do not speak to us as to whether he can win, based on the alleged expert views of people who have been following and promoting falsehoods for probably their whole entire lives.

Instead, join us, those who can believe in the truth as spoken by Bernie Sanders. Why? Because it is the truth!!!!! From all the lying that is taken as commonplace in the U.S. today, perhaps it's hard to imagine that the truth can burn through just about anything. Because it is the truth!!!!

And that is what people are responding to, and that is why Bernie can and, we believe, will, WIN and win big, because of us and through us and for all of us.

riversedge

(70,205 posts)
77. I do not see it as a smear. Sanders uses that descriptor
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:33 PM
Oct 2015

himself. This is a discussion board and to discuss this issue should not be a problem.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
82. You might to notice how many more people
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:39 PM
Oct 2015

have been blocked from the Hillary group than from the Bernie group here.

I think that says a lot about the relative ability of each group to tolerate dissent and criticism.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
84. Same shit, Different day.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:51 PM
Oct 2015

Wrong the first 10 dozen times you posted it. Still wrong today.

Perhaps you need to reset your watch. It's not 1955 anymore.

Joe McCarthy called says he wants his dumbass.Red Scare back.

Autumn

(45,071 posts)
85. So why is it if a smear if we are talking about Hillary's chances ?
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 04:05 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie is not a self described socialist, he is a Democratic Socialist. A lot of Democrats and Independents don't like Hillary because of her baggage. Republicans will go all out to keep "Billary" as they like to call them out of office. Bernie doesn't have those problems. When people hear Bernie message they like his message. Hillary's? Not so much.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
87. Come back with your opinions once you figure out how to get Democrats elected in your own state.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 05:46 PM
Oct 2015

This is like the Jaguars opining to the Patriots on how to win championships

Response to RBInMaine (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Stating and arguing an op...