2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat did Bernie mean when he said....."But that's not important"
Last edited Wed Sep 30, 2015, 01:06 PM - Edit history (1)
What's not important?
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2014/11/19/365024592/sen-bernie-sanders-on-how-democrats-lost-white-voters
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)What's not important?
Simple question.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)vote in your best interest.
FSogol
(45,579 posts)SHOCKING!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)FSogol
(45,579 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)In the style of mindless Republican smear
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)If you read the paragraph, it's easy to understand what he's saying. At least it is to me. Not sure why it isn't clear to you.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)If it's so easy to understand, explain it.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)FormerRepublicanNow
(43 posts)is not important or smart. After all the Republicans have Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, Carly Fiorina, and Ted Cruz. Vote on the basis of your own best interest.
artislife
(9,497 posts)....????
Le sigh.
The Polack MSgt
(13,200 posts)What are you talking about, all I see are trees
mak3cats
(1,573 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)That's what is not important. Just a waste of time. Doesn't hurt Bernie. Doesn't advance your candidate. Just makes you look impotent and bitter.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)MindfulOne
(227 posts)What he means, it is painfully obvious, is that what immediately precedes that line, "a Hispanic community which is looking to the Democrats for help", is not important.
He is saying that regardless of where Hispanics or Asians or others are looking for help, we simply have to help, we have to look at what they need and how we can help them.
It is a decidedly apolitical POV, one that says "this Democratic party versus Republican party bullshit has to end".
After all, it was the leaders and not the parties so much that gave us the great programs.
Look at today's Democratic party, with DWS fucking things up. It's a bag of shit in terms of making a difference, it ain't democratic.
Sanders seeks to restore it to it's former glory, but he's not going to perpetuate the old falsehood that's let so many down: Just vote for the Democrat, and it will be alright.
He's educating the voting populace.
That's probably painful for some.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I know that you think this bone is tasty, but it's getting rancid.
Okay, perhaps instead of "that's not important" Sanders should have said "but that is less important than unity, and coming together to advance our common interests."
But he made that clear in the rest of his statement.
He's basically talking about the Big Tent that the Democratic Party claims to be, and not getting caught up in the Politics of Division the GOP specializes in.
Got a problem with THAT?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Now I don't need to waste any energy on this pathetic OP.
Response to Armstead (Reply #14)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It would be best for both of us.
After the way some people here have been treated, it's made me even more determined.
I'm not going anywhere.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)do not put her on ignore!
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)....??????????????????????????
The desperation runs VERY DEEP in this one.
I almost feel sorry for anyone this invested into something that isn't ever going to happen.
Almost.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It's becoming humorous to listen to Sanders talk about immigration. He and his supporters are trying desperately to re-write history. He just can't cover up the facts and some things are going to have sunlight on them soon. It is not a lie or assumption to say Sanders is strongly opposed to a path to citizenship. In 06 and 07 he teamed up with the most vile of republicans to defeat comprehensive immigration reform. He proved he would work with anyone in order to stop their pathway to citizenship. On the other side of the isle from Sanders and his republican co-horts you had Obama, Clinton, Biden and Ted Kennedy who wanted it to pass. Watching it go down in defeat is one of Sanders greatest legislative accomplishments. Lets be clear, stopping a path to citizenship for over ten million people is considered to be one of his greatest legislative accomplishments. What did Sanders claim the reason to continue the oppression of over ten million people in this country? Economics. There is literally zero debating that and people don't try because they know the words came right out of Sanders mouth. He put economics above that of a humanitarian crisis in our own country. Now that congress is even more conservative, Sanders is acting like he wants a pathway to citizenship. It is beyond dishonest.
He literally fought to continue the oppression of millions of people in this country because of visas. Stop bullshitting yourself people.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)uponit7771
(90,370 posts)RussBLib
(9,048 posts)as usual, it's complicated
spend a couple of minutes on this one
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/bernie-sanders-and-immigration-its-complicated-119190
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Forget about anti-immigrant sentiment or racism, long rooted in American society for 200 years. The key to all ills in the nation is the billionaire class. I guess it's a kind of trickle-down theory for us leftists. Get rid of the billionaire class and all this other stuff (which is "not important" will right itself.
It's an odd combination of 1930s style American Marxism and a kind of Revolutionary French Jacobinism. I'm on record disagreeing with this rigidly economic approach, even if I agree with Sanders on the need to address income inequality and to further reform Wall Street and corporate regulation in this country. I find the singular focus on wealth misses huge swaths of issues critical to real Americans: not only African Americans and Hispanics but women and families.
You can put all the "big money interests" you want in prison, but it won't help racial bias, or violence against women, or gun violence, or a host of other problems. It won't create a classless society or a paradisiacal new America. It's just too narrow.
(The paragraph cited is also insulting to minorities and paternalistic.)
Armstead
(47,803 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)"ok fellow posters on this other site,I'm going in,cover me" and here you all all.
Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Armstead
(47,803 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)(paraphrasing)
What happens when C_D shoots arrows into the sky?
What
He misses.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)People think he is incredibly consistant because he's so honest. Not saying huge isn't- but it's obviously the could talk about economics in his sleep and kick ass. He's so experienced in that area, no gaffes will occur.
That isn't half as bad as when people brought up Ferguson and he pivoted to college- which is where Mike Brown was headed. Ouch.