Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:02 PM Oct 2015

Cillizza: Bernie Sanders’s $26 million cash haul is a major problem for Hillary Clinton

Cillizza: Bernie Sanders’s $26 million cash haul is a major problem for Hillary Clinton

Clinton held 58 fundraising events to raise her total; Sanders held seven. As of the end of September, Sanders had brought in 1.3 million total donations from 650,000 individuals since he began running. Clinton's campaign did not release how many total donors she has. And Sanders ended September with $25 million in the bank; Clinton did not release how much money her campaign had on hand.

Read between the lines, and you get this: Sanders is drawing huge amounts of small-dollar donations via the Web. That means two important things: (1) Sanders has been able to concentrate on meeting and greeting potential voters rather than spending his time courting donors, and (2) He has been able to conserve money because he isn't spending cash on lavish events for donors.

Money is, of course, a sign of broader trends in the race as well. Sanders is the grass-roots candidate who is appealing to the heart of the party base; Clinton is the lead candidate, accruing donations — at least in part — out of a sense that, in the end, she will be the nominee.

That story line is — as you might have guessed — not a good one for Clinton. It reinforces everything that people already believe about the dynamics of the contest — that Sanders is the energy candidate who is speaking the language of the base and that Clinton continues to struggle to inspire that sort of devotion and passion.

Sanders, who began this campaign as an oddity, now has every vestige of a serious candidate — from crowds to organization to money. And he has the one thing that Clinton badly wants/needs: energy.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cillizza: Bernie Sanders’s $26 million cash haul is a major problem for Hillary Clinton (Original Post) portlander23 Oct 2015 OP
A right wing hack whose task is to take Clinton down. Evergreen Emerald Oct 2015 #1
Well, David Brock is a right wing/now centrist wing hack whose job is to take Bernie down. djean111 Oct 2015 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #15
He is left wing and anti-Bernie? djean111 Oct 2015 #19
Cleezy is not very good at but he keeps trying. nt DURHAM D Oct 2015 #10
He sure does keep trying to carry the water for the RW Evergreen Emerald Oct 2015 #12
Yes. And Still She Stands. DURHAM D Oct 2015 #18
No, Bernie has one thing Hillary can never have, credibility Fumesucker Oct 2015 #2
He had never been scrutinized. Never. Evergreen Emerald Oct 2015 #8
so what exactly is hillary's camp waiting for? Javaman Oct 2015 #26
something they can say that doesn't like petty and minute, javaman. Sincerely, I am roguevalley Oct 2015 #28
Yeah okay. BlueWaveDem Oct 2015 #3
But ridiculous articles from notorious Bernie-hater David Brock are okay? djean111 Oct 2015 #5
I posted no such articles. BlueWaveDem Oct 2015 #6
Articles by Brock are posted here at DU. By Hillary supporters. djean111 Oct 2015 #9
And I'm sure you denounce anti-Bernie articles without BlueWaveDem Oct 2015 #11
ah, you want your cake and eat it too. Brock is your right wing hack. Hillary roguevalley Oct 2015 #29
when did David Brock call Sanders dsc Oct 2015 #25
even if the 90% of the article is BS... Javaman Oct 2015 #27
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #7
new goalposts incoming ibegurpard Oct 2015 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #14
Except this article wasn't about emails. aidbo Oct 2015 #16
Correct the Matters. frylock Oct 2015 #20
Was he drinking a tall glass of Mad Bitch Beer while writing this? Sorry, but his bias is known and Metric System Oct 2015 #17
Poor Hill...she has had such a rough time... SoapBox Oct 2015 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #22
It probably means the sources are of questionable bethical value. Gore1FL Oct 2015 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #24

Evergreen Emerald

(13,071 posts)
1. A right wing hack whose task is to take Clinton down.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:06 PM
Oct 2015

I think DU can do better. Sleeping with the enemy gets you fleas and bedbugs.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. Well, David Brock is a right wing/now centrist wing hack whose job is to take Bernie down.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:13 PM
Oct 2015

He gets quoted here all time.
Neither one can "take a candidate down".

Response to djean111 (Reply #4)

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
19. He is left wing and anti-Bernie?
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:51 PM
Oct 2015

Neither Brock not Hillary are actually left wing. Correct the Record his Brock's super PAC devoted to doing whatever it takes to get the nomination for Hillary, including trying to slime Bernie.
And, in Hillary's own words -

"You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center," Clinton told the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. "I plead guilty."


Didn't you get the memo? The Democratic Party merely has a left wing contingent; they are called outliers and not very welcome except when their votes are wanted.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,071 posts)
12. He sure does keep trying to carry the water for the RW
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:28 PM
Oct 2015

I just read did a quick google search and there is an article about him posting 50 Clinton headlines on the e-mail BS.

And still she stands.

DURHAM D

(32,617 posts)
18. Yes. And Still She Stands.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:48 PM
Oct 2015

Cleezy is Andrea Mitchell's most frequent guest on MSNBC, has been for years. What does that tell you?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
2. No, Bernie has one thing Hillary can never have, credibility
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:08 PM
Oct 2015

That's where the energy is coming from, credibility.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,071 posts)
8. He had never been scrutinized. Never.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:18 PM
Oct 2015

I venture to guess that very few people could hold up under such scrutiny. No one is perfect. No one says everything perfectly correct every time.

Every statement, thought, action of Clinton is reviewed with the most negative lens and then given the most negative connotation to justify the bizarre constant frenzied attacks.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
28. something they can say that doesn't like petty and minute, javaman. Sincerely, I am
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 04:34 PM
Oct 2015

trying not to laugh at the pettiness of some of the commentary here.

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
3. Yeah okay.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:09 PM
Oct 2015

Another ridiculous article from a notorious anti-Hillary hack. Hillary has broad appeal across every demographic of the Democratic party and is the first choice of Dem voters by a huge margin. She broke fundraising records as well.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
5. But ridiculous articles from notorious Bernie-hater David Brock are okay?
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:15 PM
Oct 2015

Articles directly from a Hillary Super PAC head are to be believed? bwahahaha!

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
9. Articles by Brock are posted here at DU. By Hillary supporters.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:20 PM
Oct 2015

Do you read the pro-Hillary stuff, or just make comments in pro-Bernie OPs?
We can thank Brock, however, for releasing such an egregiously stupid email trying to tie Bernie to Hugo Chavez that Bernie raised over a million dollars in one day. There's that.

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
11. And I'm sure you denounce anti-Bernie articles without
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:25 PM
Oct 2015

Also denouncing anti-Hillary articles. Difference is I'm not asking you to denounce any of them the way you are doing to me.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
29. ah, you want your cake and eat it too. Brock is your right wing hack. Hillary
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 04:35 PM
Oct 2015

even has him over to the house.

dsc

(52,170 posts)
25. when did David Brock call Sanders
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:04 PM
Oct 2015

a Hebe or the equivalent and get fired for doing so. That is what Cilliza did to Clinton he called her a bitch and then got fired from a gig for having done so.

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
27. even if the 90% of the article is BS...
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:07 PM
Oct 2015

you can't get past this...

"Clinton held 58 fundraising events to raise her total; Sanders held seven. As of the end of September, Sanders had brought in 1.3 million total donations from 650,000 individuals since he began running. Clinton's campaign did not release how many total donors she has. And Sanders ended September with $25 million in the bank; Clinton did not release how much money her campaign had on hand."

58 events against 7 events.

she had 27 mill. he had 25 mill.

doesn't take a genius to figure out whose more popular.

Response to portlander23 (Original post)

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
17. Was he drinking a tall glass of Mad Bitch Beer while writing this? Sorry, but his bias is known and
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 12:47 PM
Oct 2015

his opinions are hopelessly compromised.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
21. Poor Hill...she has had such a rough time...
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 02:30 PM
Oct 2015

Flying all across the country, in her private loaner jet, to all those $2700 per plate private get togethers with Billionaires and Banksters...flying high above all those little people that are gathering by the hundreds of thousands in homes, restaurants, parks and rallies for Bernie.

Poor Hill...she's so very busy shoveling up all that dirty money.

Response to SoapBox (Reply #21)

Gore1FL

(21,161 posts)
23. It probably means the sources are of questionable bethical value.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 02:54 PM
Oct 2015

Why, in the context given, did you go with illegal?

Response to Gore1FL (Reply #23)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cillizza: Bernie Sanders’...