2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCillizza: Bernie Sanders’s $26 million cash haul is a major problem for Hillary Clinton
Cillizza: Bernie Sanderss $26 million cash haul is a major problem for Hillary ClintonClinton held 58 fundraising events to raise her total; Sanders held seven. As of the end of September, Sanders had brought in 1.3 million total donations from 650,000 individuals since he began running. Clinton's campaign did not release how many total donors she has. And Sanders ended September with $25 million in the bank; Clinton did not release how much money her campaign had on hand.
Read between the lines, and you get this: Sanders is drawing huge amounts of small-dollar donations via the Web. That means two important things: (1) Sanders has been able to concentrate on meeting and greeting potential voters rather than spending his time courting donors, and (2) He has been able to conserve money because he isn't spending cash on lavish events for donors.
Money is, of course, a sign of broader trends in the race as well. Sanders is the grass-roots candidate who is appealing to the heart of the party base; Clinton is the lead candidate, accruing donations at least in part out of a sense that, in the end, she will be the nominee.
That story line is as you might have guessed not a good one for Clinton. It reinforces everything that people already believe about the dynamics of the contest that Sanders is the energy candidate who is speaking the language of the base and that Clinton continues to struggle to inspire that sort of devotion and passion.
Sanders, who began this campaign as an oddity, now has every vestige of a serious candidate from crowds to organization to money. And he has the one thing that Clinton badly wants/needs: energy.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,071 posts)I think DU can do better. Sleeping with the enemy gets you fleas and bedbugs.
djean111
(14,255 posts)He gets quoted here all time.
Neither one can "take a candidate down".
Response to djean111 (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
djean111
(14,255 posts)Neither Brock not Hillary are actually left wing. Correct the Record his Brock's super PAC devoted to doing whatever it takes to get the nomination for Hillary, including trying to slime Bernie.
And, in Hillary's own words -
Didn't you get the memo? The Democratic Party merely has a left wing contingent; they are called outliers and not very welcome except when their votes are wanted.
DURHAM D
(32,617 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,071 posts)I just read did a quick google search and there is an article about him posting 50 Clinton headlines on the e-mail BS.
And still she stands.
DURHAM D
(32,617 posts)Cleezy is Andrea Mitchell's most frequent guest on MSNBC, has been for years. What does that tell you?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That's where the energy is coming from, credibility.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,071 posts)I venture to guess that very few people could hold up under such scrutiny. No one is perfect. No one says everything perfectly correct every time.
Every statement, thought, action of Clinton is reviewed with the most negative lens and then given the most negative connotation to justify the bizarre constant frenzied attacks.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)keeping their powder dry and all that?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)trying not to laugh at the pettiness of some of the commentary here.
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)Another ridiculous article from a notorious anti-Hillary hack. Hillary has broad appeal across every demographic of the Democratic party and is the first choice of Dem voters by a huge margin. She broke fundraising records as well.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Articles directly from a Hillary Super PAC head are to be believed? bwahahaha!
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Do you read the pro-Hillary stuff, or just make comments in pro-Bernie OPs?
We can thank Brock, however, for releasing such an egregiously stupid email trying to tie Bernie to Hugo Chavez that Bernie raised over a million dollars in one day. There's that.
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)Also denouncing anti-Hillary articles. Difference is I'm not asking you to denounce any of them the way you are doing to me.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)even has him over to the house.
dsc
(52,170 posts)a Hebe or the equivalent and get fired for doing so. That is what Cilliza did to Clinton he called her a bitch and then got fired from a gig for having done so.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)you can't get past this...
"Clinton held 58 fundraising events to raise her total; Sanders held seven. As of the end of September, Sanders had brought in 1.3 million total donations from 650,000 individuals since he began running. Clinton's campaign did not release how many total donors she has. And Sanders ended September with $25 million in the bank; Clinton did not release how much money her campaign had on hand."
58 events against 7 events.
she had 27 mill. he had 25 mill.
doesn't take a genius to figure out whose more popular.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)And Bernie will overshoot them as well.
Response to portlander23 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
aidbo
(2,328 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)his opinions are hopelessly compromised.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Flying all across the country, in her private loaner jet, to all those $2700 per plate private get togethers with Billionaires and Banksters...flying high above all those little people that are gathering by the hundreds of thousands in homes, restaurants, parks and rallies for Bernie.
Poor Hill...she's so very busy shoveling up all that dirty money.
Response to SoapBox (Reply #21)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Gore1FL
(21,161 posts)Why, in the context given, did you go with illegal?
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #23)
Name removed Message auto-removed