2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAnyone think O'Malley could be the big winner after the debate?
Something tells me that his candidacy could get a boost from finally being on the big stage.
The people who are looking towards folks like Joe Biden as a potential alternative to Clinton or Sanders may find what they are looking for in Martin O'Malley.
I can imagine a scenario where he gets some positive attention and a bump in the polls and it becomes a three-person race between him, Bernie, and Hillary - with Joe declining to run.
What do other think?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)It could be devastating for Hillary.
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)elleng
(131,085 posts)(big IF) media is honest. I don't expect much from MSM, but as I often read local media about O'Malley's appearances around the states, they do a pretty good job, so if they cover the debate as they've covered his day to day work in IA and NH, at least, things should improve.
Here's an example: O'Malley criticizes trade deal in Iowa stop.
I was against the Trans-Pacific Partnership 8 months ago."
NEWTON Martin OMalley does not think much of the multi-nation trade deal announced this week.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12813656
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)O'Malley (to some degree) to pump up Bernie. CNN isn't the only medium that wants to offer viewers a "really good shew," and the series is going to run for some while.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It's his best shot. But I suspect he'll have to be aggressive, so he could potentially blow himself up.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)When I saw him at the Iowa Dem-palooza dinner, I thought he helped himself.
I also think going alphabetical helped both OM and Clinton and pretty much used Webb to wipe the floor.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Is that for the order of the opening remarks?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I think it crushed Webb. He had nothing unique to say. I think it let OM speak before Sanders and much of what they said was the same.
I think the debates are usually decided by drawing lots
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Perhaps he will climb above 0 percent in the polls.
askew
(1,464 posts)The Wing Ding wasn't. They put Hillary and Sanders first and their supporters left before others spoke or were so disruptive no one could hear the other speakers. Horribly rude.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)people who agree with Bernie's message may be more comfortable with somebody who has a similar message but fits more with their "image" of what a President is supposed to look like.
I think the biggest difference between him and Bernie is his insistance that people don't vote for "anger." It will depend on how much and how deep people's anger is. And that's going to depend on how much the recovery has worked for them versus passed them by or effed them over royally.
I used to have a really good intuition about those things, but I fall into the last category so I am so overwhelmed by depression and anger that I desperately need a candidate who channels that anger for me and will use it to help people like me.
But I don't know how many others like me there are out there. I know they are there, but I don't know where the balance is. I suspect, given the traction Trump and Bernie have, that it is broad and deep. But I'm too filled with it myself to be able to sense how much is "me" versus "others."
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)he's nothing like Fiorina, but the analogy being, with the right presentation it only took one debate for her to get an incredible boost...same for O'Malley.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)The MSM ignored Bernie for what seemed a long time. The price short of setting himself on fire for attention was trash-talking the frontrunner, and he declined.
jfern
(5,204 posts)But that's only 1% -> 2%
LynnTTT
(362 posts)Our Democratic Club is having a mock debate a week after the CNN debate. I will be speaking for O'Malley. My points:
- he's the only candidate who has actual "governing" experience (mayor of a large city and governor)
- he's young and very presentable (balance against Rubio)
-has actually balanced a budget (required by law of course)
- he's been against the TPP for months- didn't just get on board like Hillary
- pro-choice for years
- has been accused of being a little too tough on crime, resulting in the problems with Baltimore police. However, I believe that secretly, being tough on crime doesn't bother Democrats all that much!
Anyone with any suggestions for my brief 10 minute presentation?
askew
(1,464 posts)He really shines there.
Also his repeal of death penalty, passing strict gun control laws, raising minimum wage, decriminalizing marijuana, restoring felons rights to vote, making it easier to vote in Maryland. Pushing through the largest windfarm on the east coast. Cleaning up the bay and making fracking regulations so tough that no company was willing to do business in Maryland.
artislife
(9,497 posts)It isn't like a small town. Though it's numbers do not match Baltimore's, there is a host of issues besides putting in a new stop sign by the school.
Thanks, I just did a 20 minute search of the city and info. I definitely want to go there now.
Oh, I think Martin has a great chance tomorrow night. He can change the direction of his campaign--but who knows how the media will spin things afterwards.
Good luck with the debates, at least you have a very interesting candidate to portray.
elleng
(131,085 posts)1. Ended death penalty in Maryland
2. Prevented fracking in Maryland and put regulations in the way to prevent next GOP Gov Hogan fom easily allowing fracking.
3. Provided health insurance for 380,000
4. Reduced infant mortality to an all time low.
5. Provided meals to thousands of hungry children and moved toward a goal for eradicating childhood hunger.
6. Enacted a $10.10 living wage and a $11. minimum wage for State workers.
7. Supporter the Dream Act
8. Cut income taxes for 86% of Marylanders (raised taxes on the rich).
9. Reformed Marylands tax code to make it more progressive.
10. Enacted some of the nations most comprehensive reforms to protect homeowners from foreclosure.
Mother Jones magazine called him the best candidate on environmental issues.
Article here:
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/12/martin-omalley-longshot-presidential-candidate-and-real-climate-hawk
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)CNN can't just ignore everyone except Hillary and Bernie
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)1) He is by far the best out of them in a debate format and should win hands down.
2) He needs more than just a "win," he needs to pull a rabbit out of his hat. He is competent and smart enough to do it but it's a position no one wants to be in and mistakes can be made.
Go big or go home O'MG.
askew
(1,464 posts)off a surprise or manages to score an obvious point vs. Hillary.
Fiorina and Carson both boosted themselves by having solid debates without pulling a rabbit out of their hat. That's what O'Malley needs. Everyone already has an opinion on Hillary and this debate isn't going to win over new supporters for her. But, very few know who O'Malley is. If he is up there being optimistic and talking about his record of accomplishment, he is going to win people over.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But he has been neck and neck with Chafee and Webb since entering. I think we will find out if his aspirations are for the presidency or VP slot tomorrow night. If it's the Presidency I think he will take a chance and go after Clinton multiple times. He has taken some shots recently.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Like Sanders and unlike Clinton he's not afraid to give straight answers to even tough questions. Clinton just doubletalks nearly everything to death with platitudinous Turd Way nothingness manufactured in Goldman's basement.
moondust
(20,005 posts)I think his problem and that of others is trying to gain traction in a political system that corporate media have turned into a contest about big money, big name recognition, and sensational sound bites rather than substantive policy ideas. Exhibit A: TheRump on teevee 24/7.
elleng
(131,085 posts)MerryBlooms
(11,771 posts)Many believe this is a Hillary-Sanders debate to win or lose, but honestly, I see O'Malley converting a lot of voters tomorrow night.
demwing
(16,916 posts)It will either be self inflicted, or come from O'Malley.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I think he will do very well and will get a boost. I also think Sanders will do very well and receive a boost too. But Hillary is a very skillful debater so she could receive the biggest jump of all. It's kind of like a sporting event. You never never know until it's played. I'll score it myself (I don't watch any of that punditry nonsense on tv). But the polls of course will determine who wins and who doesn't do as well. The real polls that matter are the actual primaries. Most of the pre-primary polls seems pretty unreliable. As many here have said though, I'm hoping the biggest winner is the democratic party. We need more democrats (and more liberal democrats) in all phases of government: state legislatures, governors, the House, the Senate, school boards etc.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Often times, it just takes the pundits saying so-and-so did well for the public to follow suit.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)But I still cannot stand watching or listening to them!
ALBliberal
(2,344 posts)With him. I started out Clinton but now I am solid Bernie. But I like O'Malley's persistence and fortitude. Who knows? Sanders/O'Malley?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But Mr OMalley is a democrat and there will be many posts to fill in her administration.
I'm looking foward to seeing him speak.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)he will finally get the boost that I believe he deserves.
I'm dedicated to Bernie and I'm already informed on the top three candidates however, the debate will help O'Malley.
he's the youngest and most outspoken (other than Bernie) he's thirsty as well. I'm sure he'll have good energy on that stage.
good luck to him.