2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJim Webb had chance to kick Bernie's ass tonight and decided not to do it
When they asked him about Bernie applying for conscientious objector.
I thought that was very respectable.
During the Vietnam War, the man standing next to you, Senator Sanders, applied for status as a conscientious objector. Given his history, can he serve as a credible commander-in-chief?
WEBB: Everybody makes their decisions when the time there is conscription. And as long as they go through the legal process that our country requires, I respect that. And it would be for the voters to decide whether Senator Sanders or anyone else should be president.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)to oppose the Vietnam War. That is undeniable.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)They work together on veterans issues. And I think that Webb carries scars from the war to this day. He will remain loyal to anyone who helps him with the pain he carries. Working on those issues helps him to deal, he clearly understands that vets need a stronger safety net and more services to help them with their pychic and physical wounds.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Bernie became Veterans chair exactly when Webb left the Senate, though.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)and who didn't agree.
In fact IIRC the number who agreed, among the youth, was a minority.
Since the Vietnam war didn't make a lick of sense.
The differences were between tactics for dealing with the abhorrent situation.
Here in Canada we benefited by an influx of draft dodgers and their families, who tended to be very likable folk with a large creative potential. For certain those draft dodgers had a better outcome than the poor sobs who ended up in a paddy in Vietnam with their heads blown off. Life is unfair because there is no justice. Not really.
Maybe we should learn to not enter into wars of choice like Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Syria?
Maybe?
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)Lots of Americans were against the Vietnam war.
delrem
(9,688 posts)"Oh! But the war is there! I'm from a military family! So yippee ai yae!"
Well, that's an explanation of sorts. A bloody poor excuse for an explanation, especially for a candidate for POTUS, but there you go. It's what you've got.
murielm99
(30,765 posts)they knew they would be drafted otherwise. They chose, if qualified, a branch of the service that they saw as a better personal option. It did not necessarily mean they avoided combat.
I grew up during the Vietnam era. Most of the people I knew were against the war. Many people served honorably, in spite of their reservations. It was a tough time for young men. They had to make difficult, life altering decisions.
I cannot disrespect anyone's choices during that time. No one, Presidential candidate or otherwise, should have to explain themselves.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)In my opinion it also shows that even our worst democratic candidate is a million times better than the republicans' best candidate.
left on green only
(1,484 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)And just the right thing to do
Joe Chi Minh
(15,229 posts)often said in his opinion the conscientious objectors were the really courageous one. It took more courage. Not that I personally think it was a wise choice in WWII.