Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,205 posts)
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:09 AM Oct 2015

Hillary Clinton just took this big swipe at Wall Street and Colbert's crowd went nuts



TWEET
Mother Jones ‏@MotherJones 11m11 minutes ago

Hillary Clinton just took this big swipe at Wall Street and Colbert's crowd went nuts http://bit.ly/1MsTRHE





Political MoJo

Hillary Clinton Tells Stephen Colbert: I Would Let Big Banks Fail

—By Inae Oh
Wed Oct. 28, 2015 9:25 AM EDT


Hillary Clinton appeared on the Late Show on Tuesday night, .......................


But it wasn't all softball questions. After weighing in on topics like the middle class and Bernie Sanders—responses Colbert jokingly hit back as a "cheap trick" to say things people like—Clinton was then directly asked how she would handle an economic situation like the 2007 financial crisis and whether she'd let big banks fail.

The Democratic presidential candidate answered emphatically, "Yes, yes, yes, yes."
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton just took this big swipe at Wall Street and Colbert's crowd went nuts (Original Post) riversedge Oct 2015 OP
Hillary did an out-standing job yesterday.... chillfactor Oct 2015 #1
Yup. Agschmid Oct 2015 #17
I'm quite sure financial paymasters were aware of NorthCarolina Oct 2015 #2
I enjoyed that. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #3
Colbert attracts great progressives. That's her crowd. She was at home. nt. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #5
Break up the big banks and she won't have to let any fail. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2015 #6
Here was her response in 2008 in an OP Ed to WSJ boston bean Oct 2015 #7
This is the kind of thing that really depresses and angers me. mmonk Oct 2015 #8
It will quickly become apparent if she gets elected - she had her fingers crossed when she said that corkhead Oct 2015 #9
as usual too little too late...which ever way the wind blows. bowens43 Oct 2015 #10
I guess you missed this lunamagica Oct 2015 #21
Ummmm pinebox Oct 2015 #11
Does anyone really believe with the millions in income she has received from the Autumn Oct 2015 #12
K & R Iliyah Oct 2015 #13
Once again, she says whatever she thinks the audience wants to hear. Scuba Oct 2015 #14
Yep, I was super disappointed that Colbert went that easy on her. askew Oct 2015 #16
#ThingsBernieSaidFirst eom Fawke Em Oct 2015 #15
Yeah sure. 99Forever Oct 2015 #18
changing on one issue is flip-flopping left lowrider Oct 2015 #19
Talk Is Cheap colsohlibgal Oct 2015 #20

chillfactor

(7,575 posts)
1. Hillary did an out-standing job yesterday....
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:14 AM
Oct 2015

I watched the interview and the crowd was really with her...

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
2. I'm quite sure financial paymasters were aware of
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:18 AM
Oct 2015

her words well before she ever spoke them on Colbert. Believably factor=0.

Response to riversedge (Original post)

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
6. Break up the big banks and she won't have to let any fail.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:23 AM
Oct 2015

The problem is that they are too big - not that they weren't allowed to fail.

This is all talk, she knows that she could never follow through on that promise.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
7. Here was her response in 2008 in an OP Ed to WSJ
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:26 AM
Oct 2015
There is a broad consensus that Congress must act to stave off deeper turmoil on Wall Street. Irrespective of the final agreement yet to be reached, there are several principles that must be part of a broader reform effort that begins this week and continues in the coming months.

This is not just a financial crisis; it's an economic crisis. Therefore, the solutions we pursue cannot simply stabilize the markets. We must also deal with the interconnected economic challenges that set the stage for this crisis -- and reverse the failed policies that allowed a potential crisis to become a real one.

First, we must address the skyrocketing rates of mortgage defaults and foreclosures that have buffeted the economy and ignited the credit crisis. Two million homeowners carry mortgages worth more than their homes. They hold $3 trillion in mortgage debt. Nearly three million adjustable-rate mortgages are scheduled for a rate increase in the next two years. Another wave of foreclosures looms.

I've proposed a new Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC), to launch a national effort to help homeowners refinance their mortgages. The original HOLC, launched in 1933, bought mortgages from failed banks and modified the terms so families could make affordable payments while keeping their homes. The original HOLC returned a profit to the Treasury and saved one million homes. We can save roughly three times that many today. We should also put in place a temporary moratorium on foreclosures and freeze rate hikes in adjustable-rate mortgages. We've got to stem the tide of failing mortgages and give the markets time to recover.

The time for ideological, partisan arguments against these actions is over. For years, the calls to provide borrowers an affordable opportunity to avoid foreclosure as a means of preventing wider turmoil were dismissed as government intrusion into the private marketplace. My proposals over the past two years were derided as too much, too soon. Now we are forced to reckon with too little, too late.

As a result, the home-mortgage crisis slowly eroded the value of debt instruments upon which Wall Street firms were depending. That is how this house of borrowed cards began to fall. If we do not take action to address the crisis facing borrowers, we'll never solve the crisis facing lenders. These problems go hand in hand. And if we are going to take on the mortgage debt of storied Wall Street giants, we ought to extend the same help to struggling, middle-class families.

Second, American taxpayers should have a voice and a stake in the resolution of this market crisis. If the Treasury proposal is enacted in its current form, the American government would assume enough financial risk to become the majority shareholder in the companies rescued by taxpayer dollars.

The American people are bearing the risk and therefore deserve to reap the rewards of a shared equity model. And mortgage securities bought by taxpayers must be valued accurately at prices disclosed in real time, with checks and reporting requirements to prevent abuse.

Third, taxpayers are being asked to bear an unparalleled degree of financial risk. We cannot allow taxpayers to take on this burden so that Wall Street and the Bush administration can hit the "reset button." This historic intervention demands a historic shift in priorities: an end to the broken culture on Wall Street, and the broken economic policies in Washington.

Corporations that will benefit must be held accountable, not only to large shareholders but also to the American people, who are rightly tired of business as usual: short-term profit at the expense of long-term viability; lax oversight and regulation; obscene bonuses and golden parachutes regardless of performance; reckless risk-taking that has placed the markets in jeopardy; rewards for foreclosing on middle-class families and selling mortgages designed to fail; and outsourcing good jobs to serve short-term stock prices instead of America's long-term economic health.

This is a sink-or-swim moment for America. We cannot simply catch our breath. We've got to swim for the shores. We must address the conditions that set the stage for the turmoil unfolding on Wall Street, or we will find ourselves lurching from crisis to crisis. Just as Wall Street must once again look further than the quarterly report, our nation must as well.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122230767702474045

No, she wasn't copying Bernie Sanders. LOL
 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
10. as usual too little too late...which ever way the wind blows.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:32 AM
Oct 2015

this woman is unbelievable , is there any issue she won't flip flop on???? Pathetic

Autumn

(45,070 posts)
12. Does anyone really believe with the millions in income she has received from the
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:42 AM
Oct 2015

financial institutions for the speeches she has given to them that she is is even halfway serious??? I got a couple of bridges I'm willing to sell real cheap.

askew

(1,464 posts)
16. Yep, I was super disappointed that Colbert went that easy on her.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 11:34 AM
Oct 2015

He let her sit up there and lie her ass off.

One of the downsides of so few debates is that there isn't anyone to call Hillary on her bullshit. But, the GOP has reels of her flip-flopping on every issue under the sun and will use them to drive her trustworthy #s even lower.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
18. Yeah sure.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 11:39 AM
Oct 2015

She'd let banks fail.


Bwahahahahahahahaha.

That's some funny stuff right there. I don't care who you are.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
20. Talk Is Cheap
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 11:44 AM
Oct 2015

Obama said he would go after a Wall Street too.

She is taking in too many millions from Wall Street to betray them. Anyone who thinks she will is naive.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton just took...