Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:36 PM Oct 2015

What does joking about offering a Veep slot really mean?

Is it different when it is a serious statement by a campaign chairman or more patronizing?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/comment-page-7/

That is the problem with history. It exists.

Honestly She/He could be my Veep is a joke made every time there is an election like this. It has never been considered sexist.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What does joking about offering a Veep slot really mean? (Original Post) kenfrequed Oct 2015 OP
Michelle would be better randys1 Oct 2015 #1
I agree, I think she is way more progressive, even more so than her husband. nt Snotcicles Oct 2015 #11
Based on what? Where can I see her policy positions? TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #20
Nobody said it was sexist--it was condensending for a campaign manager to be saying that riversedge Oct 2015 #2
Actually Emily's List did say it was sexist kenfrequed Oct 2015 #4
No, they called it a "Condescending insult by a team who knows better" SidDithers Oct 2015 #10
Ah... kenfrequed Oct 2015 #13
Sexism is implied in that statement because male condescension towards women is a snagglepuss Oct 2015 #30
Boo Hoo Perogie Oct 2015 #28
" It has never been considered sexist." NCTraveler Oct 2015 #3
See above kenfrequed Oct 2015 #6
Link? It's missing above. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #9
See above.. kenfrequed Oct 2015 #14
Nothing above supports your claim in any way. Nt NCTraveler Oct 2015 #16
Do you mind answering the question? kenfrequed Oct 2015 #22
It's ok when Clinton's people do it. arcane1 Oct 2015 #5
John Nance Garner's observation that the office "is not worth a bucket of warm spit." Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #7
So.... kenfrequed Oct 2015 #8
Sanders has determined that his staff did something wrong, belittleling an opponent. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #12
Bernie chose to react to it kenfrequed Oct 2015 #15
Was it inappropriate when Clinton's campaign made a similar remark about Obama.. frylock Oct 2015 #18
Sanders said his staff made inappropriate comments. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #24
I disagree with him. But I couldn't help but notice you avoided my question altogether.. frylock Oct 2015 #27
Ask Sanders why it was egregious enough? Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #29
Thanks for your input. frylock Oct 2015 #32
You're welcome. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #34
Baloney, the entire job is to be ready to be President and breaking ties in the Senate. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #21
Are you acusing Sanders of whining? Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #25
No, I accuse him of indulging the entitled whining but I guess one has to pick their battles. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #35
I think he did the right thing. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #36
Not surprising. I don't subscribe to coddling tantrums, it assures even more of them. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #37
I think it was inappropriate. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #26
It was condescending and inappropriate. Bernie said it was inappropriate. tammywammy Oct 2015 #17
Was it condescending and inappropriate when Clinton's campaign made similar remarks about Obama? frylock Oct 2015 #19
Sexism is implied in that statement because male condescension towards women is a snagglepuss Oct 2015 #31
What does it mean? Nothing. Vinca Oct 2015 #23
It was sexist Nonhlanhla Oct 2015 #33
It wasn't the best thing to say, but it wasn't sexist jfern Oct 2015 #38

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
4. Actually Emily's List did say it was sexist
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:43 PM
Oct 2015

Stephenie Shriock stated it. At this point this would be tagged onto the previous nonsense attacks Hillary made to try to build up some kind of false narrative about Bernie being sexist.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
10. No, they called it a "Condescending insult by a team who knows better"
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:53 PM
Oct 2015
https://twitter.com/Schriock1/status/659434075795640321

The New York Times tried to turn that into "Emily’s List Official Accuses Bernie Sanders Team of Sexism"

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/29/emilys-list-official-accuses-bernie-sanders-team-of-sexism/?_r=0

Nowhere did Emily's List state that it was sexist.

Post the quote from Stephanie Schriock using the word sexist, if it exists.

Sid

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
13. Ah...
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 03:36 PM
Oct 2015

You may be right, Maggie Haberman may be making more of this than there is. Of course Haberman sort of has a history of fronting for Hillary from the NYT.

However, this still begs two questions for those perpetuating this:

1) if this is simply about respect then how is this different from every single other time that this joke or half-hearted offer has been made?

2) Why is it that a fair number of Hillary supporters ARE promoting this as sexism?

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
30. Sexism is implied in that statement because male condescension towards women is a
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 06:51 PM
Oct 2015

hallmark of a sexist attitude. Condescension is the gist of the phenomena known as mansplaining. But you know that as does Schriock.

Perogie

(687 posts)
28. Boo Hoo
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 06:41 PM
Oct 2015

If she can't take the heat then she should get out of the kitchen.

Oh wait, you'll claim that's sexist.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
3. " It has never been considered sexist."
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:42 PM
Oct 2015

I see your confusion. I don't recall a serious effort to call it sexist. You are trying to make a point about something that really didn't happen. My question is, why are a small group of Sanders supporters so desperate to claim they are being called sexist over this?

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
6. See above
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:44 PM
Oct 2015

Emily's List, which has already endorsed Hillary and appears to be working with the campaign.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
9. Link? It's missing above.
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:48 PM
Oct 2015

Either way, you are aware of how many million people are in this country?

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
14. See above..
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 03:41 PM
Oct 2015

It was probably Haberman's spin on this.

Still begs the question why this is so terribly offensive in this particular case.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
22. Do you mind answering the question?
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 04:38 PM
Oct 2015

How is a common joke told in a primary somehow specifically offensive in this case?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
7. John Nance Garner's observation that the office "is not worth a bucket of warm spit."
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:45 PM
Oct 2015

I didn't consider it Sexist, just their way of belittling her as not ready for the top slot.

From Sanders Reaction, he clearly understood that it was meant as an insult by his campaign staff.

But if you want a good opinion, this worked for me.

Sanders calls his campaign manager’s Clinton VP comments ‘inappropriate’
Presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders said Thursday that some recent comments by his campaign manager about Hillary Rodham Clinton were “inappropriate,” but pushed back against suggestions that he and his team have treated the Democratic front-runner in a sexist fashion.


I agree with him that it was inappropriate for them to belittle his opponent, but I did not see it as sexist.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
8. So....
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:47 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie said it was not sexist, but merely inappropriate.


OK. So how does this disagree with my point.


Also, you got Garner's quote wrong. He didn't say 'spit.'

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
12. Sanders has determined that his staff did something wrong, belittleling an opponent.
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 03:07 PM
Oct 2015

It doesn't have to be sexist to be wrong. In that, I agree with Sanders.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
15. Bernie chose to react to it
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 03:42 PM
Oct 2015

I wouldn't have.

I don't agree with everything any candidate does or says.

I will return to the question:

How is this different from every other time this joke or half-hearted offer has been made?

frylock

(34,825 posts)
18. Was it inappropriate when Clinton's campaign made a similar remark about Obama..
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 04:25 PM
Oct 2015

and if so, was everyone who is upset about this instance upset about it then?

frylock

(34,825 posts)
27. I disagree with him. But I couldn't help but notice you avoided my question altogether..
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 06:35 PM
Oct 2015

If it was such an egregious comment today, why wasn't it when Clinton's campaign essentially said the same about Obama? I'm just looking for a little consistency here, something that is always lacking when it comes to Hillary and her supporters.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
21. Baloney, the entire job is to be ready to be President and breaking ties in the Senate.
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 04:35 PM
Oct 2015

If someone isn't ready to be President then they aren't qualified for VP.

This entire thing is entitled whining.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
25. Are you acusing Sanders of whining?
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 06:33 PM
Oct 2015

Sanders said his staff made inappropriate comments. You should ask him to clarify rather than attack him about it.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
17. It was condescending and inappropriate. Bernie said it was inappropriate.
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 04:20 PM
Oct 2015

Emily's List didn't call it sexist, they said condescending. And Weaver should have known better. I assume Bernie gave him a talking to so no stupid crap like that happens again.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
19. Was it condescending and inappropriate when Clinton's campaign made similar remarks about Obama?
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 04:26 PM
Oct 2015

If yes, then where was the outrage?

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
31. Sexism is implied in that statement because male condescension towards women is a
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 07:15 PM
Oct 2015

hallmark of a sexist attitude. Condescension is the gist of the phenomena known as mansplaining.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
33. It was sexist
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 08:33 PM
Oct 2015

Of course it was sexist. Women have been told so many times that we're only good enough for the second spot (at most), that there's only so far that we can go, that we can move up in the world, but not too far up. To me (neutral right now in this race, not a Hillary or Bernie supporter) it felt condescending and sexist, basically suggesting that Hillary is only good enough for the second spot. Hillary is the front runner, and she is not running to be some man's second-in-command.

Was it intended as sexist? I don't know. That is irrelevant. Sexism, like racism, is often subliminal, and the offenders are often surprised to hear that others experienced their remarks/actions as sexist/racist, but perhaps they need to listen instead of being defensive.

Kudos to Bernie for recognizing the inappropriateness of the remark.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What does joking about of...