2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat does joking about offering a Veep slot really mean?
Is it different when it is a serious statement by a campaign chairman or more patronizing?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/comment-page-7/
That is the problem with history. It exists.
Honestly She/He could be my Veep is a joke made every time there is an election like this. It has never been considered sexist.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)riversedge
(70,215 posts)to a reporter.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Stephenie Shriock stated it. At this point this would be tagged onto the previous nonsense attacks Hillary made to try to build up some kind of false narrative about Bernie being sexist.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)The New York Times tried to turn that into "Emilys List Official Accuses Bernie Sanders Team of Sexism"
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/29/emilys-list-official-accuses-bernie-sanders-team-of-sexism/?_r=0
Nowhere did Emily's List state that it was sexist.
Post the quote from Stephanie Schriock using the word sexist, if it exists.
Sid
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)You may be right, Maggie Haberman may be making more of this than there is. Of course Haberman sort of has a history of fronting for Hillary from the NYT.
However, this still begs two questions for those perpetuating this:
1) if this is simply about respect then how is this different from every single other time that this joke or half-hearted offer has been made?
2) Why is it that a fair number of Hillary supporters ARE promoting this as sexism?
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)hallmark of a sexist attitude. Condescension is the gist of the phenomena known as mansplaining. But you know that as does Schriock.
If she can't take the heat then she should get out of the kitchen.
Oh wait, you'll claim that's sexist.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I see your confusion. I don't recall a serious effort to call it sexist. You are trying to make a point about something that really didn't happen. My question is, why are a small group of Sanders supporters so desperate to claim they are being called sexist over this?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Emily's List, which has already endorsed Hillary and appears to be working with the campaign.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Either way, you are aware of how many million people are in this country?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)It was probably Haberman's spin on this.
Still begs the question why this is so terribly offensive in this particular case.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)How is a common joke told in a primary somehow specifically offensive in this case?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)They live by different rules than we progressives do.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)I didn't consider it Sexist, just their way of belittling her as not ready for the top slot.
From Sanders Reaction, he clearly understood that it was meant as an insult by his campaign staff.
But if you want a good opinion, this worked for me.
Presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders said Thursday that some recent comments by his campaign manager about Hillary Rodham Clinton were inappropriate, but pushed back against suggestions that he and his team have treated the Democratic front-runner in a sexist fashion.
I agree with him that it was inappropriate for them to belittle his opponent, but I did not see it as sexist.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Bernie said it was not sexist, but merely inappropriate.
OK. So how does this disagree with my point.
Also, you got Garner's quote wrong. He didn't say 'spit.'
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It doesn't have to be sexist to be wrong. In that, I agree with Sanders.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I wouldn't have.
I don't agree with everything any candidate does or says.
I will return to the question:
How is this different from every other time this joke or half-hearted offer has been made?
frylock
(34,825 posts)and if so, was everyone who is upset about this instance upset about it then?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)You should take that up with him.
frylock
(34,825 posts)If it was such an egregious comment today, why wasn't it when Clinton's campaign essentially said the same about Obama? I'm just looking for a little consistency here, something that is always lacking when it comes to Hillary and her supporters.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)I accept his word for it.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)We will chat again sometime.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)If someone isn't ready to be President then they aren't qualified for VP.
This entire thing is entitled whining.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Sanders said his staff made inappropriate comments. You should ask him to clarify rather than attack him about it.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)There's no way in hell they should consider Clinton for the VP slot.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Emily's List didn't call it sexist, they said condescending. And Weaver should have known better. I assume Bernie gave him a talking to so no stupid crap like that happens again.
frylock
(34,825 posts)If yes, then where was the outrage?
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)hallmark of a sexist attitude. Condescension is the gist of the phenomena known as mansplaining.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)It's just typical campaign BS.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Of course it was sexist. Women have been told so many times that we're only good enough for the second spot (at most), that there's only so far that we can go, that we can move up in the world, but not too far up. To me (neutral right now in this race, not a Hillary or Bernie supporter) it felt condescending and sexist, basically suggesting that Hillary is only good enough for the second spot. Hillary is the front runner, and she is not running to be some man's second-in-command.
Was it intended as sexist? I don't know. That is irrelevant. Sexism, like racism, is often subliminal, and the offenders are often surprised to hear that others experienced their remarks/actions as sexist/racist, but perhaps they need to listen instead of being defensive.
Kudos to Bernie for recognizing the inappropriateness of the remark.