2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhom Sanders and Clinton want to represent.
There was a forum tonight hosted by Rachel Maddow.
Bernie Sanders implied that as president he'd represent ordinary people, not billionaires.
Hillary Clinton said she'd represent, "the struggling, the striving, and the successful."
I'm for Sanders because I generally don't think the successful should get presidential help with their agenda. I want a president who will usually push back when Congress is considering a bill which helps the successful.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)is representing everyone whether he realizes it or not.
Blus4u
(608 posts)The successful can only postpone the pain longer.
Peace
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)it isn't so.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Small dig at the evil socialist who wants to take their yachts?
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Her donor list should make it crystal clear who she will represent.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I am successful and I hope Hillary will represent me too.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)depends what you call successful. Do you mean wealthy?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)I'm a successful artist. One member of my professional group calls us "working and working class artists."
I'd say that's an accurate description.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...would do something which would negatively affect you?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)it's hte rest of us that don't seem to have anyone at our bcks in Washington.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She is campaigning as a moderate republican.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)And she ended talking about white middle-aged people...
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I believe this is an area of real, profound difference between Bernie and Hillary. This question got to a little of it, but only when finely parsing Hillary's answer, as the OP did. It probably went unnoticed to most people, or they heard Hillary's phrasing and thought "that seems reasonable".
It isn't reasonable. The people funding Hillary's campaign, the Democratic Party establishment, and Hillary herself, are on the wrong side of this, and many other issues. The MSM does nothing to expose this, via their regular coverage (to the contrary) or even in this forum by Maddow, which was admittedly better than most MSM coverage.
We simply have no depth of coverage in the elections, and what depth there is is either produced by researchers/reporters cashing corporate paychecks and broadcasting their message to millions, or it is produced by marginalized internet sources whose message gets only to the already converted.
All of this results in a generally uniformed electorate, ripe for supporting brand a over brand b.
Mike__M
(1,052 posts)is equal benefits paid for by progressive taxation. Like Bernie's tuition plan.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)I want to be President of the United States.
Read: Third-Way.
Sam
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Definitely "third way." The "successful" are a bit over represented these days.