Hillary Clinton is PRO death penalty.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/04/09/elizabeth-warren-opposes-death-penalty-for-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-boston-marathon-bombing-trial/H04BFNRO4LgBm8xrTz7FdM/story.html

I just wanted to know the source of this poster's false claim.

I alerted on their post. Let's see what happens.

Goes to show how many are here just to misinform and disrupt.

You won't say.

They are identical, but you won't compare, because it would ruin your thread.

Both are in favor of death penalty for heinous crimes only.

Enlighten us please. And welcome to DU.

Now they won't be able to alert for 24 hours, good job jury.

On Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:42 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

And how is Hillary's position different than that of Warren's?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=861810

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Troll post.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:46 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: job for mirt
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Haha. No. Don't try to hide the truth.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: well it may be a sock or a zombie, but the post is fine.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Why are they lying about Warren??? Are you defending lies???

It's a discussion forum.

Didn't I?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=861489

What has occurred here is a clear case of jury-failure and a strong argument for why the Admins need to assert the ability to hide/delete/restore things that juries get factually wrong. Facts should assert over the opinion of the community, if we want to actually be the reality-based community we're always claiming to be.

A jury got it wrong 0-7 and now a disproven slander against a Democrat is bulletproof. Good job!

Warren is anti-DP.
Clinton is not anti-DP.

Their opinions are not identical, they're diametrically-opposed. The poster chose to ignore that those differences had been discussed.

it bothers me greatly that people I'd otherwise respect think it's perfectly okay to kill people. I want to ask: Isn't there something in the, what do you call it, the Bible? that says something about not killing? And isn't that on the top ten list of some kind?

One more reason I despise organized religion. It codifies hypocrisy.

+1.

I try to be informative in my posts, and honest in my stances on things. I often piss people off, even when not trying to do so. Thank you for your appreciation.

The truth precedes any viewpoints I might have.

Thank you.

How in the world do you rationalize this?

Not from a Democratic perspective anyway.

Because she voted to bomb and invade Iraq.

but I would love for them both to evolve on this issue.

But I'm not a one issue voter. Hillary is on record saying that it should be used very rarely. I guess that's a small start, but I still disagree with her on the Death Penalty.

Life in Prison is a fate worst than death.