2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum22.7 Million!!!*
Over Hillary Clinton's career, Wall Street has been her major campaign contributor. Need I say more?
*Crossed posted in the Bernie Sanders (Group)
olddots
(10,237 posts)"Whether you're rich or poor its nice to have money " get the money out politics and the politics out of money .
oasis
(49,388 posts)it'll take a helluva lot more than $22.7 to take on the GOP nominee.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)will give the money. this is a movement. it can't be stopped. Money can't buy passion. Period.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)This is fantasy...
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)- Senator from NY... Where Wall St. is located, of course she would have more donations from employees of these firms than some of the other candidates.
- 22.7 Million is (I believe) the total from 2001 on, so realistically it's not that much money. My town rebuilt my high school the year I graduated, that cost 75 Million, so her total contributions from Wall St. could have built less than half of my entire high school.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Looking at her poll numbers and all the political and union endorsements, it's pretty obvious that this manufactured "issue" matters to just one group of people. Enjoy your outrage!
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)expectation of ten dollars back for every penny they gave. nice.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I thought it was a 1000:1 ratio, but as long as you're looking for something to be outraged about, ya might as well go big. Enjoy!
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)But I don't expect you to understand that.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)And... I'm still not caring.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)"An honest politician is one who, when {s}he is bought, will stay bought." - Simon Cameron, US financier & politician (1799 - 1889)
It puts Clinton in a tough spot having accepted so much of her money from an industry obsessed with profits over people.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)Sorry. What good does it do to elect a total dud who won't be able to get anything done while Republicans are having a 4-year party and laughing at him and his foolish supporters?
Beacool
(30,249 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)Wall Street is putting its money behind Democrat Barack Obama for president, despite worries that his administration would raise taxes and take a tougher line on trade and regulation.
The signs Wall Street reads point to Democrats prevailing in the November presidential and general election as voters punish the incumbent Republican Party for a flagging economy and lengthy Iraq war.
And the fact that Obama began raking in a bigger share of the cash as his campaign picked up steam suggests that investors simply want to back the eventual winner.
Illinois Sen. Obama, who captured the Democratic presidential nomination on Tuesday after a lengthy primary battle against New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, has received $7.9 million (4.1 million pounds) n contributions from the securities and investment industries, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
His opponent, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, banked a little under $4.2 million, putting him behind fellow Republicans Rudolph Giuliani and Mitt Romney, who have long since dropped out of the race.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/analysis-shares-obama-idUKNOA53525520080605
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Sure don't see it at CRP.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/indus.php?id=N00000019&cycle=2016&type=f&src=c