Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 06:19 PM Dec 2015

Why PUMA References Reflect Poorly on Hillary Rodham Clinton: A History Lesson

I’ve noticed a lot of HRC supporters refer to Sanders supporters as PUMAs. Well, first, PUMA were nominal Clinton supporters in 2008. I say ‘nominal’ because the undisputed queen of the PUMAs, Darragh Murphy, only donated to McCain prior to that.

Another notable PUMA adds to the irony, Lynn Forrester, Lady de Rothschild, seen here calling a man who grew up on food stamps an elitist, herself the daughter of an aircraft tycoon who married a baron. (The video was uploaded by another notable PUMA, Larry Johnson, best known for the ‘whitey tape’ hoax, but it actually is AC360.)



What am I getting at? PUMA created the smears about Obama, PUMA nominally supported Clinton, but PUMA really supported McCain and thought Clinton was unelectable.

When you remind people of PUMA, what you’re telling me is “Hillary can’t win—vote Hillary!”

(As an aside, the 2008 campaign was when I fell out of love with Ms Clinton, due to the racially-charged nature of the campaign, and not just the PUMAs.)


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/12/27/1464018/-Why-PUMA-References-Reflect-Poorly-on-HRC-A-History-Lesson
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why PUMA References Reflect Poorly on Hillary Rodham Clinton: A History Lesson (Original Post) Segami Dec 2015 OP
PUMAs are exclusively from the 'Not Hillary' Party. onehandle Dec 2015 #1
Resurrecting this exaggerated crap, murielm99 Dec 2015 #2
I'm not so sure Jarqui Dec 2015 #4
What is the difference in 2016, the names of the candidates. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #3

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. PUMAs are exclusively from the 'Not Hillary' Party.
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 06:48 PM
Dec 2015

No, not in real life. Just at Democratic Underground.

murielm99

(32,650 posts)
2. Resurrecting this exaggerated crap,
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 07:05 PM
Dec 2015

that was hyperbolic and largely untrue, even at the time?

I guess you are running out of memes and ways to call names, scraping the bottom of your hate-well.

Jarqui

(10,813 posts)
4. I'm not so sure
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 08:32 PM
Dec 2015

The CNN poll said 32% of Clinton supporters would not vote, 54% would vote Obama 10% McCain, 64% would vote

54/64 who vote for Obama would be 84% of those Clinton supporters who vote
10/64 who vote for McCain would be 16% of those Clinton supporters who vote

The exit polls for Clinton supporters who voted broke 83% Obama 16% McCain
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p3

Not far off at all.

Harriet Christian, a PUMA voted for McCain and felt 3,000,000 of the 18,000,000 (16.7%) Puma Clinton supporters would - very close to the exit polls and CNN's poll before.



Lynn Forester de Rothschild of the top video quit the party and joined McCain
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/they-were-hillary-clintons-die-hard-loyalists-heres-where-they-are-now/2015/05/02/82025cf2-e92a-11e4-aae1-d642717d8afa_story.html
Diane Mantouvalos, another ardent Clinton backer in 2008, .... Mantouvalos said, “I decided I’m done.” She did not vote for Obama.
....
Steve Rosinski, who was living in Los Angeles in 2008 and worked on the campaign doing everything from manning phone banks to planting yard signs, never gave up on Clinton.

He wrote in Clinton’s name in 2008, and even led a write-in effort for 2012.


MONDAY, JUN 23, 2008 07:15 AM EDT
Why Clinton voters say they won’t support Obama
The attack of the PUMAs, or a dozen reasons why Clinton voters are still too angry to come home.
http://www.salon.com/2008/06/23/pumas/

Party Unity, My Ass' - what the Pumas really stand for
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jun/07/hillaryclinton.barackobama

Hillary Clinton’s 2008 Dead-Enders Fight On
Clinton’s old supporters thrive in an alternate online reality of their own making. Party Unity My Ass.
posted on Oct. 16, 2012, at 1:06 a.m.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/hillary-clintons-2008-dead-enders-fight-on#.qdrkJPDx6

Looks to me like a lot of the top post checks out.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. What is the difference in 2016, the names of the candidates.
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 07:30 PM
Dec 2015

If Hillary is the nominee are the Sanders who say they are staying home PUMA's?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why PUMA References Refle...