2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI think it's a big mistake for Hillary to send Bill to New Hampshire
As someone who lived (until recently) in the Granite State for almost two decades, and during Clinton's terms, I have to say that Bill is not well received in the state. The state was red during Clinton's terms and he was never looked upon favorably in the state (Hillary wasn't either, but I'll not get into that). NH is a state that in general dislikes politicians and establishment. They do the absolute minimum when it comes to government, laws and enforcement. Heck, their state lawmakers get $100 / year (plus expenses) for doing their civic duty. After seeing some of the pics from Bill's events today, I'm certain it's a mistake of Hillary's campaign and they must be realizing that now. The attendance is pitiful, especially for the Democratic strongholds of the state. Furthermore, the reporters are focusing in on Bill on the questions of his sex scandals, likely inspired by Trump's rhetoric.
brooklynite
(94,535 posts)BTW - as a Sanders supporter, your guidance is appreciated.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)brooklynite
(94,535 posts)...in the last poll, she was down by only 2 points (nb-when Sanders is behind by single digits, his supporters love to talk about the margin of error, which could put Clinton ahead)
...Clinton has been ahead in half the polls in the same period.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)the only poll that matters is the one that actually counts.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)In a poll after Iowa, she was slightly behind. She won by about 2 percent.
George II
(67,782 posts)...this year there are only two. Her 39% in 2008 was the highest among those four.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)in 2008 in New Hampshire. I remember that quite clearly.
That the answer you were looking for?
brooklynite
(94,535 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)BTW, the Big Dog's approval rating is over 65%.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)It's the ground game and the power house Dems, which of course Bernie does not have.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)better than big ones to win elections. I have seen that a couple of times now and I can't help but want to hug Hillary supporters. That's an ... intriguing thing to put forward. By the way, I have loved a lot of politicians but I have never voted for one based on another's endorsements who were politicians. I lost a few races but no one's surrogates ever caught my vote. We shall see soon enough.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Geez. Bernie gets those numbers at round tables.
Gothmog
(145,195 posts)Who cares what Trump thinks. Trump is not a good judge of anything
zazen
(2,978 posts)I've been thinking Trump is a total dumbass as well as a flaming narcissist, but if anything could induce Bill out of the campaign's smart-so-far strategy of letting Hillary run on her own laurels, it's Trump's challenge to Bill's popularity and reputation. It may be that Bill needed to draw some ovations to counter Trump in the press.
I wonder if Clinton's advisers totally agreed with this strategy.
And I really, really hope Trump isn't that clever. I've been banking on his undisciplined verbal diarrhea. To think he could be this shrewd is scary.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)the obnoxious bloviating one opened his ignorant mouth
floriduck
(2,262 posts)that he can no longer be our president. Those were cheers of relief.
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)Hillary is a bad idea in what reality based universe?
jkbRN
(850 posts)Because your question is answered within the initial post.
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)hasn't is going to assert you are wrong. I find it sort of astonishing that Clinton and even her husband can't draw more than a couple of hundred people to their events. That is not a good sign I would think. We shall see.
jkbRN
(850 posts)Given the fact that you attack the poster instead of the argument.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Spontaneous moral outrage has its place.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It was forcefully felt and so was forcefully stated.
I might not agree though.
jkbRN
(850 posts)Seems a bit childish.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)On Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:40 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
The OP is full of shit
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=973089
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Using foul language to describe the OPs post with no explanation is insensitive, over the top, and therefore is highly inappropriate
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:48 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am going to allow because I think the post is about the OP content not a slam at the DUer.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This alert is full of shit.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Its a simply stated (though hardly informative) opinion. Use of the s-word isn't grounds for punitive action outside of elementary school.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Foul language? Fucking seriously? By the way, normally I would hide a post like this, but I agree that the OP is indeed full of shit and people are getting tired of the constant bashing and trashing of a Democratic candidate on Democratic Underground. It has to be said.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)since they are beginning to see what he was really doing in his presidency. The market may have done well but many of the economic changes he made are still hurting us.
I know he polls well in who everyone likes best. But who votes in those polls and who is he running against in them. It makes a difference.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)+1000
zazen
(2,978 posts)Of course I want to see Sanders win the primary.
OTOH, I still wince when I see HRC's camp make strategic blunders because I fear we're in for much more of it if she wins.
The people who are already going to vote for HRC don't need to see Bill. They either like him or are indifferent.
The undecideds already know enough about him because the Clintons have instant name recognition, and most of them need to be persuaded that she's going to govern to the LEFT of her husband given the growing economic awareness over the 15 years. Seeing him doesn't help HRC's cause, but rather hurts it.
I guess I'm glad they don't take our advice?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)Do I need to say more?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Bill will draw crowds for Hillary just like Obama will as soon as she wins the primary.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)jkbRN
(850 posts)..also, please stop attempting to speak for everyone else.
840high
(17,196 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)DailyMail.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)He canceled two of his fundraisers for Hillary in Pennsylvania. That is not good news either. The turnout for them was embarrassing for him, so he canceled them.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)You should self delete this post because it is based on a lie.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Trump is digging himself one great big hole with his cheap shots against the Clintons.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)riversedge
(70,211 posts)The people in the audience love him Have a nice day.
Julie McClain @McClainJulie 2h2 hours ago
No surprise, @billclinton brings Nashua crowd to its feet! Energized for next 36 days w/@HillaryforNH. #nhpolitics
Rachael Goldenberg @RachaelGoldie 2h2 hours ago
Like @HillaryClinton, @BillClinton speaks today about issues that matter - addiction, healthcare #42inthe603
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)When Clinton was President and run him out of the state! Thanks for the concern
ismnotwasm
(41,977 posts)newblewtoo
(667 posts)to try and explain NH politics to people from away. Best I can do is compare it to other states love affairs with professional sport teams. Filling a hall in NH (most are small) is not indicative of a level of support. Lots of NH voters pride themselves on hearing, seeing, meeting, all the candidates before making up their mind.
Folks turn out to see the Big Dog. They also turn out for a gun show. Entertainment is hard to come by in NH in the winter. Think of it like that.
My take? Bernie will be the principal beneficiary of this. Trump knows how to dirty up things to his advantage. Cast aspersions on Clinton to get the candidate he wants to run against for him it is Win / Win.
As I have said before the big 'tell' from this primary will be which party has momentum among the independent voters. The candidate will not matter as much as the party at this point.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)You all sound so cool.
newblewtoo
(667 posts)ice cream and cupcakes. I believe my mail man now wears a truss from all the political flyers that show up this time of year. And no one answers the phone without checking caller ID. It rings constantly. I've been polled more than a raft on the Mississippi after picking up without my glasses on. Short survey my Aunt Fanny!!
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Someone on DU posted about one of Bill Clinton's Iowa appearances being cancelled due to lack of RSVPs. Apparently no one showed up.
He hasn't campaigned here much, other than appearing with Hillary and Katy Perry at their JJ Dinner rally/speech.
I don't think she's using him in Iowa. Interesting that she is in NH.
I thought Bill did a decent job at the JJ rally.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)A DUer in this thread made a similar claim about another event, but it appears that event was cancelled due to the death of Sandy Berger (see post 14).
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and it could have been due to Sandy Berger's death. I don't know.
This was a discussion on DU. Someone else who lived in Iowa, who said the event was cancelled because there was so little turnout.
There was a back and forth between this person and I, because I was shocked about this. I thought Bill did a great job for Hillary at the JJ dinner rally. I thought Iowans would come out to see him.
The conversation is somewhere on DU! I don't have any specific links.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)dsc
(52,161 posts)but on planet earth, Clinton carried NH both times.
https://www.google.com/search?q=1992+electoral+map&espv=2&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiSsci3oJHKAhUH5mMKHedoAL4Q_AUIBygB&biw=1366&bih=623
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)planet.
dsc
(52,161 posts)that is what red state meant last I checked. He won it both times, I supplied maps which proved it.
postatomic
(1,771 posts)Anger and Fear. Just Anger and Fear.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Look at the governorship: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Governors_of_New_Hampshire
And the state legislature, which has rarely been blue: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Hampshire_General_Court
Furthermore, the US Senate and Legislative members were distinctly Republican during Clinton's terms.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Anyone who became a Republican under a moderate like Bill Clinton must be a full blown wingnut. They can enjoy their tRump, JEB! and Ted Crud rallies.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Won the nomination, won in the general election against an incumbent. His name is Bill Clinton.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Funny, you like to meld the two when it comes to positives like charisma and charm (he has it, she... not so much), but you call others sexist if they make a point about some of his atrocious policies (NAFTA, communications act, etc) that Hillary supported by saying that his policies aren't hers (even if she touted them).
Can't have your cake and eat it, too.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)won the nomination and went on to win the election over an incumbent. You are correct, the bills passed during Bill Clinton are not Hillary's policies. Some of the bills passed during Bill Clinton's administration was given a yes vote by Sanders, one being the CFMA which played a big part in the financial crisis. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
senz
(11,945 posts)I've wondered why she's pulling Bill into it so early in the game. The girls standing behind him didn't look too thrilled, but they probably don't know much about him, being so young.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Clinton won NH in 1992 and 1996. Hillary won the state's primary in 2008. Sanders may win NH, as he is from neighboring VT, but it won't be because either Clinton is disliked in the state.