Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
191 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you send Bill Clinton out as your surrogate (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 OP
BILL CLINTON IS A GOD !!! Hiraeth Jan 2016 #1
Unfortunately, that god is ZEUS. eom Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #99
ZEUS IS A GOD !!! Hiraeth Jan 2016 #103
Zeus!....Zeus!..... PatrickforO Jan 2016 #151
Then Bernie best not send out his wife RandySF Jan 2016 #2
Oh, like that hasn't been brought up right here at DU. djean111 Jan 2016 #4
Yes it's been on DU RandySF Jan 2016 #17
Lol. You posted two pieces yesterday slamming her. cali Jan 2016 #5
But according to the OP, there is nothing wrong with that. Squinch Jan 2016 #6
I'm not whining, I'm warning....dear RandySF Jan 2016 #10
Ooh, I'm so scared cali Jan 2016 #21
... Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #181
Thanks for the warning update Randy. FarPoint Jan 2016 #128
Wow, i thought the headlines were hyperbolic, but you guys really ARE getting nervous. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #180
Because of bullshit right wing nonsense? Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #7
It can be brought out, also, remember the GOP has not vetted Sanders yet, lots of information Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #18
Indeed. Stand by. Most of Hillary's supporters here have learned the hard way ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #36
I think the "hair on fire" reaction from some, in regard to the PP endorsement of Hillary is a still_one Jan 2016 #168
got any skeletons for us now? ish of the hammer Jan 2016 #55
Has cgoogle restricted your access? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #113
you are the one talking about skeletons falling out of the closet - ish of the hammer Jan 2016 #125
Heard this also from rightwing, racist teapartiers on another board. Like deja vu for me randys1 Jan 2016 #106
investigate Bernie and his wife 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #8
Are you sure? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #19
You constantly say Bernie will be vetted...why don't you just post these dire things you hint at? Punkingal Jan 2016 #25
It's been done. Such things never survive alerts. (Go figure.) NurseJackie Jan 2016 #37
Because I am not the GOP. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #94
if you got the dirt, share it. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #29
Are you supporting Sanders? I do my research on the Candidates, I do not Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #96
In other words, you got nothing. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #102
I have supported him for years, and I'm not asking you to do my work for me. Punkingal Jan 2016 #109
Yep. This Vermonter is pretty sure. cali Jan 2016 #45
compared to Clinton? 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #75
That's because the Clintons have been on the national and world stage for decades, whereas.... George II Jan 2016 #78
or is it because they are dishonest as hell 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #89
Oh really Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #97
Yes - really. 840high Jan 2016 #161
Some people would rather that Clinton didn't come back 20 years later. Tennis Magnet Jan 2016 #159
I actually thought Edwards was a saint yeoman6987 Jan 2016 #156
re Edwards enid602 Jan 2016 #166
So true. yeoman6987 Jan 2016 #174
Hillary's lies alone make people 840high Jan 2016 #158
hypocritical enid602 Jan 2016 #13
Oh! The horror!!!!! notadmblnd Jan 2016 #32
pretty much enid602 Jan 2016 #40
The banks are KNOWN to be immoral uponit7771 Jan 2016 #57
Please, detail the circumstances of this horror of a scandal notadmblnd Jan 2016 #65
LMGTFY... uponit7771 Jan 2016 #66
So you don't know? notadmblnd Jan 2016 #68
loan enid602 Jan 2016 #160
fraud enid602 Jan 2016 #127
Well, she lost her job because of it. PatrickforO Jan 2016 #153
lawyers enid602 Jan 2016 #167
Which do you think voters would be most interested in INdemo Jan 2016 #108
fees vs overstatement of assets enid602 Jan 2016 #178
It is a big deal ... GeorgeGist Jan 2016 #182
Naive? enid602 Jan 2016 #185
And even if that is true (and it's not been investigated much to determine), it's still Fawke Em Jan 2016 #189
Score one for reason. n/t bvf Jan 2016 #3
Well, actually, it's but ONE of his problems... haikugal Jan 2016 #9
Everyday the Big Dog is campaigning redstateblues Jan 2016 #11
Knowing what I know now, I would not cross the street to see him. djean111 Jan 2016 #14
Voted for him, now I am saddened that I was so taken in by that man. nt artislife Jan 2016 #115
NAFTA DOMA End Welfare as We Know It Omnibus Crime Financial Deregulation Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #26
Here's an article with a list of many ways Bill screwed over the 99%: kath Jan 2016 #71
Peace for whom Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #39
War on welfare recipients happynewyear Jan 2016 #61
+1 azurnoir Jan 2016 #95
welfare reform enid602 Jan 2016 #186
Why don't you ask Bernie Sanders this question? happynewyear Jan 2016 #187
Interesting enid602 Jan 2016 #188
You're blaming him for those? You, Cruz, and Rubio redstateblues Jan 2016 #144
Are you denying Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #147
Rwanda, LOL, can you imagine what that poster would be saying if we had invaded stevenleser Jan 2016 #177
Ya mean like $15,000,000,000.... 99Forever Jan 2016 #58
+1 tecelote Jan 2016 #88
Sure... if you weren't poor and needed that safety net/jobs kdmorris Jan 2016 #120
Tell that to the Iraqi people n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #126
Jury results: merrily Jan 2016 #12
Not even a remotely imaginative misuse of the alert button. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #27
I think the U.S.S. Adjective sailed months ago. merrily Jan 2016 #34
I think they get extra points or do double duty grave dancing whe they snag themselves an old timer. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #41
I knew "bimbo trail" was risky and considered replacing it. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #46
When did the RW get the "bimbo" franchise? Proserpina Jan 2016 #51
Yeah.. one_voice Jan 2016 #111
You do know that Bill did in fact have a series of extramarital affairs, right? Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #131
Of course I'm aware... one_voice Jan 2016 #134
Where did I blame Hillary Clinton for Bill's asshole behavior? Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #135
Hold your breath while you wait. n/t one_voice Jan 2016 #137
At least you admit you've got nothing. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #139
Calling these women "bimbos" Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #164
That alert also failed. But it was closer. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #183
Right. Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #184
So ridiculous. The truth is filth. An anonymous post on DU tarnishes Sanders merrily Jan 2016 #50
Yeah, well- sticks and stones..... notadmblnd Jan 2016 #64
We've agree on this merrily Jan 2016 #69
I don't disagree with that, I just happen to think it is what it is. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #72
I think it is a special issue for women. merrily Jan 2016 #74
Yeah, but call it out and move on. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #77
Connection with Bill Clinton's past is "demeaning to us all"? delrem Jan 2016 #83
It's not that they didn't try notadmblnd Jan 2016 #43
But doesn't that depend on what the meaning of is is to sycophants? HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #101
Juror #7 - we're not voting for DU. 840high Jan 2016 #162
Bill Clinton was the FIRST disastrous hire of Hillary Clinton Proserpina Jan 2016 #15
What in holy hell are you babbling about? Godhumor Jan 2016 #22
WTF? winter is coming Jan 2016 #172
I agree (nt) bigwillq Jan 2016 #16
Perhaps I'm in a small minority but I found his escapades disgraceful and disturbing then cali Jan 2016 #20
And I find her putting up with it even more disturbing Proserpina Jan 2016 #23
I don't. cali Jan 2016 #31
That really bugs me too. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #35
I do too n/t MissDeeds Jan 2016 #42
I'm sure she did the political calculation -"which will hurt my career more - ditching him, or being kath Jan 2016 #73
^^^ agree with this ^^^ Hiraeth Jan 2016 #84
+10000000 azmom Jan 2016 #91
exactly which is better being the current Mrs Clinton or the ex Mrs Clinton azurnoir Jan 2016 #98
Are you disturbed that Eleanor Roosevelt didn't leave Franklin, Tanuki Jan 2016 #107
Yes, frankly. I am. Proserpina Jan 2016 #110
sadly i do too questionseverything Jan 2016 #129
Another case of "It's okay if you are a Republican -lite" Proserpina Jan 2016 #133
My mom was still alive at that time happynewyear Jan 2016 #148
He put his penis ahead of anything else bigwillq Jan 2016 #28
I'm not inclined to pass any judgment on sexual affairs of people I don't know personally bigtree Jan 2016 #53
Larry Klayman is irrelevant to my opinion cali Jan 2016 #60
of course, I remarked on more than Klayman bigtree Jan 2016 #67
I think you mistake whining... NCTraveler Jan 2016 #24
No really it is whining. And quite a bit of it, as you of course are aware. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #30
At least, someone should tell the Hillary campaign that Bill's hedgehog Jan 2016 #33
Marital problems do not negate anybody's romantic stories of how they met. stone space Jan 2016 #47
Having gone through the romantic courtship AND the bitter divorce, I must disagree Proserpina Jan 2016 #62
Agreed. Cringeworthy! Dems to Win Jan 2016 #87
Bill fucking REPEALED GLASS STEAGAL for christsakes!!! Indepatriot Jan 2016 #38
Lobbying for the Commodities Futures Act of 2000 has done as much damage, if not more, merrily Jan 2016 #52
He just signed the bill...... Historic NY Jan 2016 #63
Bill also openly supported its repeal. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #92
No, it's not "fair game", but as near as I can tell, ... stone space Jan 2016 #44
Of course its fair game. The people who campaign for you, more specifically who you send out Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #48
THe corporatist that gave us NAFTA, GATT, WTO, the end of Glass-Stegall, the Tellecommunications act Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #49
Yes, wingers have been talking about Clenis for a long time... wingers uponit7771 Jan 2016 #54
There are "wingers" on both sides of the political spectrum. Beacool Jan 2016 #121
Yeap, I tell republicans all the time the DNC is full of conservatives that can't vote for stupid.. uponit7771 Jan 2016 #123
Penises and emais will dominate. The hot topics we will all be hearing about. Autumn Jan 2016 #56
You mean the guy that still has a 60% approval rating............. Historic NY Jan 2016 #59
first of all, it's only a 'game' to those who practice the politics of personal destruction bigtree Jan 2016 #70
my my whatta devastating rebuttal via indictment of a bad word choice stupidicus Jan 2016 #81
hey, stupidicus bigtree Jan 2016 #85
musta missed your imaginary rebuttal stupidicus Jan 2016 #191
indeed, the negative ramifications of his criminal justice/welfare reform should be pinned on HC too stupidicus Jan 2016 #76
If the far RW and some on the left, want to run in circles screaming ... JoePhilly Jan 2016 #79
as I said, that is the least of his problems. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #100
Yea, that high approval rating he had ... the peace, prosperity during his ... JoePhilly Jan 2016 #105
we bombed the hell out of Iraq during his presidency. smiley Jan 2016 #170
Support and defense of the Clinton campaign sulphurdunn Jan 2016 #80
Right, his record on public matters elleng Jan 2016 #82
I spent the 90s (and after) defending Bill Clinton. Still don't care about his penis. senz Jan 2016 #86
"GOP women urge Trump to drop talk of Bill Clinton sex scandals" emulatorloo Jan 2016 #90
Trump has the same problem and can't keep a wife larkrake Jan 2016 #93
Is Trump campaigning for a Democratic candidate, at their request? 99Forever Jan 2016 #117
EXACT words I heard from a teaparty rightwing racist on another board. randys1 Jan 2016 #104
What utter nonsense. Correlation does not imply causation. cali Jan 2016 #116
Link please.... truebrit71 Jan 2016 #124
NO, I wont link rightwingers on other boards, that you dont believe what I am saying randys1 Jan 2016 #149
No. I just asked you to back your statement up. truebrit71 Jan 2016 #150
You are on record questioning whether or not I saw rightwingers attacking Hillary... randys1 Jan 2016 #152
No. I am on record asking you to back up your assertion. truebrit71 Jan 2016 #154
Oh yay, another blame Hillary.. one_voice Jan 2016 #112
I couldn't agree more... BooScout Jan 2016 #114
Did you actually read what I wrote? Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #132
Here: one_voice Jan 2016 #136
And how exactly is that blaming Hillary for Bill's penis problem? Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #138
Keep holding. n/t one_voice Jan 2016 #140
So when you said " Oh yay, another blame Hillary.." you were slandering me. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #142
.. mcar Jan 2016 #143
So sad to see Sanders supporters stoop to this alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #118
It was sad for me that 840high Jan 2016 #163
Wow, this board has really become a cesspool. Beacool Jan 2016 #119
If you attack Bill Clinton you are not helping Democrats win. Period. nt ucrdem Jan 2016 #122
Perhaps Bill should have thought of that. 840high Jan 2016 #165
Fuck that noise. Bill's not running for anything and pretending he doesn't have major flaws winter is coming Jan 2016 #173
Are folks on DU TeddyR Jan 2016 #130
I will have to work until I reach at least 70... 99Forever Jan 2016 #141
As Christopher Hitchens said, Bill got things passed that republicans.... truebrit71 Jan 2016 #171
Bill Clinton did NOT save this party -in fact he did incredible damage to it with the goddam DLC kath Jan 2016 #145
You aren't serious? TeddyR Jan 2016 #175
Oh, baloney. I supported Clinton at the time, but lets not whitewash his record. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #146
I had a young family during his term bigtree Jan 2016 #155
Im not portraying it as a failure. The 90s were exciting and saw some real prosperity. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #157
Where has Gennifer Flowers gone? long time ago. Where have all the husbands gone? reddread Jan 2016 #169
As Bernie so eloquently put it: “Hillary Clinton is not Bill Clinton." emulatorloo Jan 2016 #176
but she sure bears the shame of being his wife, and its not an act of heroism reddread Jan 2016 #179
His insisting on listening to rap and metal. Juicy_Bellows Jan 2016 #190

RandySF

(58,770 posts)
2. Then Bernie best not send out his wife
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:03 AM
Jan 2016

Or they may be answering questions about Burlington College overstating assets and pledges to get a loan, and then leaving the lender on the hook for $2 million. Isn't this the kind of behavior he campaigns against?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. Oh, like that hasn't been brought up right here at DU.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jan 2016

Many times. And I have no doubt that Hillary will use it.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
6. But according to the OP, there is nothing wrong with that.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jan 2016

Personally I strongly disagree, but you can't have it both ways.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
7. Because of bullshit right wing nonsense?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jan 2016

Bill really did leave a Bimbo trail and really did get a blow job from an intern in the Oval Office. That really did happen. This is not Vince Fostet horseshit. But, as I said, his penis problem is mostly irrelevant. His administration ran and ruled on the right, and during the primaries that is a bigger problem for your candidate.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
18. It can be brought out, also, remember the GOP has not vetted Sanders yet, lots of information
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jan 2016

can and will come out, skeletons will fall. Bill did what he did, the whole story has been vetted, what else can come out, more RW talking points? Bill can handle the talking points, nothing new here.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
36. Indeed. Stand by. Most of Hillary's supporters here have learned the hard way ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jan 2016

... that any specific mention of such things on this web site (things that the GOP and others will take great delight in publicizing) doesn't survive alerts and juries. People have created a cozy and safe environment within the confines of this digital fortress, and it's clear that many have forgotten what the real world may have in store.

Oh well.

still_one

(92,136 posts)
168. I think the "hair on fire" reaction from some, in regard to the PP endorsement of Hillary is a
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:24 PM
Jan 2016

precursor to what we can expect when that echo chamber bubble gets popped


ish of the hammer

(444 posts)
125. you are the one talking about skeletons falling out of the closet -
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:31 PM
Jan 2016

perhaps you could elucidate?
i'm not the one worried about Sanders skeletons, apparently you are, but i haven't seen any skeletons from you yet, even though I've given you a helpful suggestion of where you might look.
so far, no skeletons for Sanders
BUT, the Clintons sure have a lot!
did you want me to google that?

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
8. investigate Bernie and his wife
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:10 AM
Jan 2016

All u want. Compared to the Clinton scandals, I'm sure the Sanders will look like saints. Lol

I know this because Bernie has excellent character, unlike the corporate loving Clintons.

Tit for tat, Bernie's all that.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
109. I have supported him for years, and I'm not asking you to do my work for me.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:24 PM
Jan 2016

I am asking you to show us this information you CONSTANTLY allude to.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
75. compared to Clinton?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jan 2016

Almost anyone would be looking pretty damned good on honesty, integrity, scandals, donations, and who they will work for. So yeah I feel pretty secure with Bernie. Hell she could make soma republicans come out looking goodif they are being compared along those lines.

George II

(67,782 posts)
78. That's because the Clintons have been on the national and world stage for decades, whereas....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jan 2016

....the Sanders have been essentially small town politicians in one of the country's least populated states.

Millions and millions of people have voted for both of them in elections, the most Sanders ever got was 207,000. That's the order of magnitude of exposure the two couples have gotten.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
89. or is it because they are dishonest as hell
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

and plot to scam money staying only within an inch of legality, or at least proof?

 

Tennis Magnet

(38 posts)
159. Some people would rather that Clinton didn't come back 20 years later.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:58 PM
Jan 2016

Point made, no further discussion needs to be made.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
166. re Edwards
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:08 PM
Jan 2016

It's always the ones who lead the Barbie & Ken lifestyles that end up shocking you the most.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
13. hypocritical
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:12 AM
Jan 2016

Jane's having 'cooked the books' resulted in defrauding a bank and a state agency. Does not jive with Bernie's central talking points of greed, banking corruption and punishing Wall Street execs.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
32. Oh! The horror!!!!!
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

And the banks have defrauded who and how many? Yeah, Jane Sander's is just like them.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
65. Please, detail the circumstances of this horror of a scandal
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:23 PM
Jan 2016

What was the loan for? How did the bank lose?

enid602

(8,614 posts)
160. loan
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:59 PM
Jan 2016

The loan was for Burlington College to buy land. The bank was belatedly paid off, but only after the college sold the land. The cost to tjhe college was considerable. Pount is Jane overstated assets by $3mm to get the loan.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
127. fraud
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jan 2016

As is anyone who knowingly commits fraud. Let he (or she) who has not sinned be the first to cast stones.

PatrickforO

(14,570 posts)
153. Well, she lost her job because of it.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:44 PM
Jan 2016

And I don't know the whole story about who did what. But I do know that charges weren't filed and she lost her job.

As far as I'm concerned, she's even with the house, and she isn't the one running anyway. Nor is Bill.

It's Hillary and Bernie.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
167. lawyers
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:12 PM
Jan 2016

No charges because she lawyered up when called on the carpet. Think we've seen this tactic since.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
108. Which do you think voters would be most interested in
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jan 2016

Bill Clintons speaking fees of$200,000+ sponsored by the likes of Goldman Sachs,Citi Croup AIG, and many more and some foreign.
Or Hillary's speaking fees from $125,000 to $200K + from the same sponsors and more, plus Canadian Banks sponsoring the Keystone Pipeline

So which you think voters would really care about?
I would also like to give you one of Bill Clinton's famous lines in reference to
"Burlington College overstating assets"
"That dog don't hunt anymore"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/31/hillary-clinton-speeches-keystone_n_7463108.html

enid602

(8,614 posts)
178. fees vs overstatement of assets
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:49 AM
Jan 2016

I don't think Bill said that in response to Burlington College. Many successful ex Presidents and Secretaries of states garner large fees for speaking. But being accused of fraud is a big deal, especially when a good part of your husband's platform is drastic reform of Wall Street greed and corrupt banking practices.

GeorgeGist

(25,319 posts)
182. It is a big deal ...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:37 AM
Jan 2016

and you shouldn,t be making the charge. She counted pledged monies. Naive? Yes. Fraud? No.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
185. Naive?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:19 AM
Jan 2016

She was the President of the college, and signed off on a balance sheet that overstated endowments by $2M to support a loan from a bank that was further guaranteed by a Vermont state agency. Of course, one might argue that a CEO can't be responsible for every detail on such a balance sheet. Still, it was a college of only 200 students, and even given a very high administration to student ratio, there would be very few administrators. Remember, these actions took place in 2010, well after the bust.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
189. And even if that is true (and it's not been investigated much to determine), it's still
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

far, far less of a scandal than the dozens Bill has been or is involved in.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
11. Everyday the Big Dog is campaigning
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:11 AM
Jan 2016

Is a bad day for Bernie. We had 8 years of peace and prosperity during his two terms.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
14. Knowing what I know now, I would not cross the street to see him.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

The glamor fades, the effects of things like NAFTA affect us all.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
26. NAFTA DOMA End Welfare as We Know It Omnibus Crime Financial Deregulation
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jan 2016

what's not to like for a modern center right reagan-thatcher-new-democrat?

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
39. Peace for whom
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jan 2016

93 ' WTC bombing

The attack on USS Cole

The genocide of 500,000 Rwandans died (while he sat idle)

Oklahoma City Bombings

Increased in incarceration rate

Continuation of failed drug wars





happynewyear

(1,724 posts)
61. War on welfare recipients
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jan 2016

That one really showed what a low creature he is. I'll never forget the look on his face as he informed the public about it. It was cruel and grotesque, loathsome and disgusting and yep, these issues are a lot bigger than the issue at large so to speak.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
186. welfare reform
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

Clinton did not have the votes in the legislature to stop welfare reform. He, was however able to temper it by raising the EIC (the tax day credit that gives low wage workers a considerable tax credit to more approximate a living wage), thereby ushering the largest migration out of poverty in US history. But you forget that. I believe that FDR devised Aid for Families with Dependents as way of ameliorating poverty among families during his lifetime. A bridge, if you will. But if welfare reform was 'grotesque, loathesome and disgusting' as you say, why isn't repeal of welfare reform part of Bernie's platform?

happynewyear

(1,724 posts)
187. Why don't you ask Bernie Sanders this question?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:15 PM
Jan 2016

www.berniesanders.com

As for Bill Clinton and his problem, well he made his bed and he can lie in it. He sickens me and nothing will ever change this fact.

enid602

(8,614 posts)
188. Interesting
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jan 2016

I went to the website, but saw nothing that would indicate he is proposing to repeal welfare reform. Weird, as he appears to be promising everything else. And his supporters still use welfare reform as an indictment against Bill Clinton.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
144. You're blaming him for those? You, Cruz, and Rubio
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jan 2016

All agree. You're reaching on that one. He started no wars although it sounds like you wish he had.

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
147. Are you denying
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:52 PM
Jan 2016

the incarention rate did not go up during his terms ?

Are you denying that drug wars under his presidency like many other have been a failure


That was a war on specific community (my community)

Peace and prosperity right

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
177. Rwanda, LOL, can you imagine what that poster would be saying if we had invaded
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:37 AM
Jan 2016

Rwanda to try to stop the genocide?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
58. Ya mean like $15,000,000,000....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:17 PM
Jan 2016

... (that's $15 BILLion, folks) lawsuit filed a couple of days ago against the USA by TransCanada for rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline under authority of Bill Clinton's NAFTA "free tade" agreement, to be decided by corporate "arbitrators" not by the Courts of OUR Nation?

That the kind of "prosperity" you are bragging up?


Yeah, soooooper dooooooper wonderful shit to be crowing about.

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
120. Sure... if you weren't poor and needed that safety net/jobs
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jan 2016

that he ripped out from under us.

Welfare "reform", NAFTA to name a few...

merrily

(45,251 posts)
12. Jury results:
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:11 AM
Jan 2016
On Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:05 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

If you send Bill Clinton out as your surrogate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251987250

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Do we really need to attack democrats with rw smears hear at du? This post is disgusting.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:09 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Stating truth is a violation of DU's TOS now? A smear? Yet another abuse of the alert button.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Do you not think the repigs will do this? Be ready. Prepared. Plus, this is mild compared to the majority we see in this forum.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OP is correct... He was the president and his record, good and bad, is all fair game.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The Impulsive Serial Alerter strikes again. Get over it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I don't think this helps DU's image.


Juror #7, since when is not helping DU's image a violation of the TOS?
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
27. Not even a remotely imaginative misuse of the alert button.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jan 2016

C'mon alerter, you can do better than this.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
34. I think the U.S.S. Adjective sailed months ago.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

Use of the alert button is the only thing going on now, not "imaginative" use or "judicious" use or "fair" use. Just use. Just hit the alert button and hope you get a fellow DUer, including a long time fellow DUer, a hide or a ban.



And, if that doesn't do it, whine to the admins that the person should be banned anyway. (L0onix and MannyGoldsten spring to mind.)



notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
41. I think they get extra points or do double duty grave dancing whe they snag themselves an old timer.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jan 2016

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Because of bullshit right wing nonsense?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=987277

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Referring to women as "bimbos" is terribly over the top inappropriate here. Please do not use RW language and adopt it as your own. RW'ers go around calling women "bimbos" as a normal course of business, please do not bring this here. It's degrading and sexist.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:34 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: It's sad to see so many here falling into the pattern of RW speak in defense of their chosen candidate. They don't seem to realize the filth is beginning to tarnish their candidate as well as themselves.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The Clintons are not untouchable
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: give it a rest.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: LOL
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Time to let the Old Dog alone. Attempts to chain his past to Hillary's present is demeaning to us all.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
46. I knew "bimbo trail" was risky and considered replacing it.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:01 PM
Jan 2016

But then again, what a fucking joke this place can be. If I get hides for speaking the truth oh well.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
51. When did the RW get the "bimbo" franchise?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:11 PM
Jan 2016

It's a regular American word, applicable to anyone who behaves like one...and if the shoe fits, then you probably aren't courting Cinderella!

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
111. Yeah..
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:35 PM
Jan 2016

I agree. What a joke, when you can't use a rw smear on DEMOCRATIC underground. Jeeze what the heck.....

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
131. You do know that Bill did in fact have a series of extramarital affairs, right?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:26 PM
Jan 2016

For that to be a smear it would have to be false.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
134. Of course I'm aware...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jan 2016

I'm also aware it was litigated to fucking death. It was HIS PENIS that had the affairs. Only the right hang that shit on Hillary hence the rw smear. Clear enough now?

Do you always blame the wife for the husband's mistakes or is Hillary special?

The right drag out his affairs as often as they drag out Reagen......

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
183. That alert also failed. But it was closer.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:20 AM
Jan 2016

The phrase is one of the common expressions used to describe the many extra marital affairs Mr. Clinton engaged in during his political career. It was used widely - pretty much across the political spectrum - as it concisely describes Mr. Clinton's behavior. The "problem" is also described as the fear of an impending "eruption" - a new event surfacing, always a risk with some politicians.

Perhaps there is some way to frame this as alert worthy too?

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
184. Right.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:03 AM
Jan 2016

It is what it is.

I was politically aware back then and I know where I heard it.

Used widely, and all that...

Not sure what you're on about here but, I certainly don't want to ruin your gotcha moment. Have at it.




merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. So ridiculous. The truth is filth. An anonymous post on DU tarnishes Sanders
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:07 PM
Jan 2016

Honestly, if I were subject to vertigo, I'd be afraid to try to stand up after reading such nonsense.

However, to be candid, I am not especially fond of using derogatory words to describe women. On the other hand, I suspect that alert had more to do with trying to protect the Clintons than with trying to protect women.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
64. Yeah, well- sticks and stones.....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jan 2016

I get tired of it.

I find it exhausting to have to deal with those who continuously look for things to be offended by here when in fact, they're alerting for no other reason than to shut down conversations that they don't happen to agree with. Apparently they're just not capable of articulating an argument against it.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
69. We've agree on this
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jan 2016

"when in fact, they're alerting for no other reason than to shut down conversations that they don't happen to agree with

I just don't think being groped makes a woman a bimbo and I don't think calling women names that suggest "slut" is a good thing..

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
72. I don't disagree with that, I just happen to think it is what it is.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jan 2016

It's human nature to sort, categorize and label, It's also human nature to be judgmental. I think on our journey to become better human beings- some of us get there before others do. I think if it wasn't for the need of others to feel superior over those that aren't quite there yet- those that are not there yet, would get there more quickly.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
74. I think it is a special issue for women.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jan 2016

Slut shaming of a female pregnant out of wedlock. Blaming the rape victim for having dressed "too seductively." Making a illness (nymphomania) of women having "too many" sex partners, while making the male who does the same thing an object of admiration, etc. Even though I think the history justifies being one-sided about it, I don't use terms like "dick" or "prick."

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
77. Yeah, but call it out and move on.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jan 2016

I guess I'm not as evolved as you- I have called men whores in the past. On two different occasions to be exact. To their faces and they were both hurt by it. But you know what? I bet they never called a woman a whore again.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
83. Connection with Bill Clinton's past is "demeaning to us all"?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jan 2016

I wish Clinton supporters could get their stories straight.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
101. But doesn't that depend on what the meaning of is is to sycophants?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jan 2016

If your heroic Ivanhoe emulator suffers character assaults, he can't ride in like the knight he should be and thereby can't aid the campaign.

Seems to me that depending on what the meaning of is is to people seeking particular outcomes, that simply MUST disrupt 'the message' and it's likely to be hurtful to sycophants

I think this was, at least in that respect, a fair, if solipsistic, use of the alert button.


 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
15. Bill Clinton was the FIRST disastrous hire of Hillary Clinton
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jan 2016

She then compounded her error by retaining him in the position...

because she thought she might as well collect on her investment, or as a grown-up child of abuse, she felt she deserved no better. Or some combination of the two.

Hillary really needs a good shrink. Not a legacy presidency.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
22. What in holy hell are you babbling about?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:27 AM
Jan 2016

I mean, really, this seemed like a good idea to you to post?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
20. Perhaps I'm in a small minority but I found his escapades disgraceful and disturbing then
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jan 2016

And I do now. I am not a prude. It has more to do with his poor judgment, his lack of regard, his lack of self control and his abuse of power.

kath

(10,565 posts)
73. I'm sure she did the political calculation -"which will hurt my career more - ditching him, or being
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jan 2016

a Doormat and staying with him."

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
98. exactly which is better being the current Mrs Clinton or the ex Mrs Clinton
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:47 PM
Jan 2016

and what if he remarried?

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
107. Are you disturbed that Eleanor Roosevelt didn't leave Franklin,
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jan 2016

or that Jacqueline Kennedy or Coretta Scott King didn't leave their husbands over their infidelities? Do you think the accomplishments and positive contributions of these men should be dragged through the mud any time their names come up, and that the wives should be blamed?

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
110. Yes, frankly. I am.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:25 PM
Jan 2016

It takes TWO people to make a marriage. A one-person marriage is not a marriage at all, it's something else entirely, as well as giving permission to other infidelities and other betrayers.

questionseverything

(9,651 posts)
129. sadly i do too
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jan 2016

what message will we be sending our daughters?

it is not like it was only 1 affair and honestly,does anyone think he has changed and that behavior stopped?

i believe hc can not win the general because of this among other things

as a side note, i find it interesting that john edwards was made into a pariah by the party over one public affair

happynewyear

(1,724 posts)
148. My mom was still alive at that time
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:23 PM
Jan 2016

Mom was a good Democrat too and I remember what she said.

She said that he should STEP DOWN and I agreed with her!

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
28. He put his penis ahead of anything else
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jan 2016

Especially ahead of this country. Yes, it was selfish, disrespectful, showed poor judgment, lack of regard and self control, and yes, he did abuse his power. Sad.

Go away, Clintons. Far, far away.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
53. I'm not inclined to pass any judgment on sexual affairs of people I don't know personally
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:13 PM
Jan 2016

...I was much more disturbed by those who made it their mission to publicize it.

Also, I have no regard at all for the right of Larry Klayman to even ask questions about Bill Clinton's sex life, much less his right to get a straight answer. I don't give a damn about the law that allowed him to question the president in that way. I think it was unjust to be forced to reveal details about his private sexual affairs in that case, and Klayman bringing the probe was as good an example as any of the vileness of the inquiry.

From the idiot who convinced Lewinsky to record the conversations and retain the soiled dress; to the politicians and other shadowy figures who sought to use the set-up as an excuse to try and invalidate our votes through impeachment; I found the entire opposition effort (and the fawning, obsequious agreement from some Democrats in clucking their tongues and pointing fingers over something which I think is absolutely none of their business) to be the closest our nation has come to a palace coup.

Like Sanders said previously (and he should have stuck with that), 'We've got more things to worry about than Bill Clinton's sexual life.'

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
60. Larry Klayman is irrelevant to my opinion
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jan 2016

Bill Clinton exercised poor judgment. Repeatedly. He made it our business.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
67. of course, I remarked on more than Klayman
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:24 PM
Jan 2016

...he's just a good representation of the despicable effort to take down our Democratic president and invalidate our votes over something I don't believe is any of our business.

Republicans made it our business. It had zero to do with his job, and I think that sentiment was reflected in the increase in support he received from the general public and their rejection of the impeachment effort.

I don't really care what you or anyone else thinks about his sex life, and, I have no need at all to characterize or pass judgments on an affair I know nothing about, personally. I do know something about the politics of personal destruction which evolved out of that tabloid experience.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
24. I think you mistake whining...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:32 AM
Jan 2016

For dissemination. I firmly believe these stories solidify her current support and give many who are not that political a favorable view of her. They have no respect for these tactics.

I agree, it's fair game. They can bring it as often as they like.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
33. At least, someone should tell the Hillary campaign that Bill's
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

romantic stories of how they first met may go over well with Hillary's supporters, but for the rest of us

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
47. Marital problems do not negate anybody's romantic stories of how they met.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:03 PM
Jan 2016

Any of us could get divorced tomorrow, and we might still look back at those romantic stories with relish.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
62. Having gone through the romantic courtship AND the bitter divorce, I must disagree
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jan 2016

all I want to do is warn my younger self not to get sucked into loving a psychopath/sociopath/narcissist.

Such personality problems were not even named, let alone warned about, when I was a girl. I knew enough to avoid the drunks and druggies, the verbally and physically abusive, the mentally and physically lazy, the amoral and the sponges...but we hadn't had the huge increase of the ethically/community/family-feeling deficient that characterized the 70's and beyond.

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
87. Agreed. Cringeworthy!
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

And I'm not so sure all of Hilary's supporters enjoy the stories of Bill and Hillary's Great Love Story -- some of the young women sitting behind him seemed pretty unimpressed, too.

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
38. Bill fucking REPEALED GLASS STEAGAL for christsakes!!!
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jan 2016

And his inability to keep his pants zipped helped make Gore's 2000 run a whole lot closer than it would have been,, had he waited till he was out of office to make his booty calls. I don't give a good goddamn about what consenting adults do behind closed doors UNLESS IT DIRECTLY EFFECTS MY LIFE. The Lewinsky Problem did just that, as many, many hours were spent, and many compromises made, while getting through that. Then, of course there was the lying....ON NATIONAL TELEVISION! And "Peace and Prosperity".....two words: TECH BOOM. would've happened under any President. Was Bill a better choice than Bush 1 or Perot, or Dole? absolutely. But he was still THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS. No. More. Clintons.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
52. Lobbying for the Commodities Futures Act of 2000 has done as much damage, if not more,
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:12 PM
Jan 2016

than repeal of Glass Steagall. It's the one that allowed credit default swaps and crap mortgage derivatives, terms many heard for the first time in 2008, when honest people explained the near economic collapse of several nations. (The dishonest ones claimed it was "liar loans.&quot

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
63. He just signed the bill......
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jan 2016

its like just voting for the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, wouldn't you agree.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
44. No, it's not "fair game", but as near as I can tell, ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:58 AM
Jan 2016

...the current situation is simply a response to a voter question, and candidates can hardly be expected to endorse it.

I'll bet nobody gets Hillary on the record endorsing Bill's behavior as acceptable, either.

Indeed, I suspect that nobody will get Bill's endorsement of his own behavior on the record, as well.

But the reluctance of politicians to endorse it does not make it "fair game".






 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
48. Of course its fair game. The people who campaign for you, more specifically who you send out
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:04 PM
Jan 2016

to campaign for you, their records and behavior are legitimate issues. If Clinton sent out Rahm Emanuel should we not discuss his involvement in the cover up of the murder of Laquan McDonald?

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
49. THe corporatist that gave us NAFTA, GATT, WTO, the end of Glass-Stegall, the Tellecommunications act
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jan 2016

and set us up for the crash of 2008 and the coup de gras to democracy and US Sovereignty that is the T P P

is a god?

Put down the cool-aid, back away from the cool-aid

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
121. There are "wingers" on both sides of the political spectrum.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:39 PM
Jan 2016

The one thing they share in common is their dislike and disrespect for the Clintons.

Pathetic the vile one reads on a Democratic board.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
123. Yeap, I tell republicans all the time the DNC is full of conservatives that can't vote for stupid..
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

... and I'm thinking a good portion of them are atracted to Sanders

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
56. Penises and emais will dominate. The hot topics we will all be hearing about.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jan 2016

Sprinkled with a few other appearances of the players in the Clinton administration. Who doesn't just love the media talking about consensual affairs spun into god knows what else. Time to buy large amounts of cheese.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
59. You mean the guy that still has a 60% approval rating.............
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jan 2016

He delivered in 2012 election for Democrats. Beside exactly what does he have to do with Hillary?

You have to wonder how much people are getting paid to kick this up & who is paying them. Once you go back and review the depositions people gave I'd think they would rather hide..


Go f--king negative he can take it. He's still standing.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
70. first of all, it's only a 'game' to those who practice the politics of personal destruction
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jan 2016

...second of all, it's not Clinton who's accountable for the way you practice your politics. That's your own responsibility.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
81. my my whatta devastating rebuttal via indictment of a bad word choice
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jan 2016

that changes everything

Gee, what other moral failures on the part of pres candidates are to be given a pass, for dems and repubs alike?


bigtree

(85,986 posts)
85. hey, stupidicus
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:14 PM
Jan 2016

...I gave a clear rebuttal on this thread. Take it or leave it.

'Moral failure?' And you're deciding what's 'moral' about people's private lives?

Have at it - just leave it out of politics. Morality plays over politician's private sex life amounts to little more than a cynical political wedge. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it kicks back in your face, like in the case of Bill Clinton. The only people who are still flogging that incident are those who are still trying to unleash it's destructive, political potential. That's not something I believe Democrats should emulate or use to advantage their own politics. I find that infinitely more sleazy than a consensual sex act between adults.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
191. musta missed your imaginary rebuttal
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 07:34 PM
Jan 2016

but I do find your whine about "politics of personal destruction" pretty amusing

Infidelity is a breach of trust that only a doormat like HC would overlook, which is understandable because she'd likely be an obscure nobody today without him.

That however provides no cause for others to understand or forget his wayward ways, nor does your imaginary rebuttal. His/their whole life in public remains "fair game", so get over it, or don't

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
76. indeed, the negative ramifications of his criminal justice/welfare reform should be pinned on HC too
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jan 2016

since she likely at the very least, failed to advise him against them

and he asked for all of that when he embarked on a pre-campaign apology tour.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
79. If the far RW and some on the left, want to run in circles screaming ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jan 2016

... about Bill's yam sack ... go for it.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
105. Yea, that high approval rating he had ... the peace, prosperity during his ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:52 PM
Jan 2016

... Presidency ... HUGE problems!!

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
86. I spent the 90s (and after) defending Bill Clinton. Still don't care about his penis.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jan 2016

But I care very much about his sell-out to moneyed interests at the expense of the American people. It was shameful, anti-democratic and anti-Democratic, and most certainly IS fair game.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
90. "GOP women urge Trump to drop talk of Bill Clinton sex scandals"
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

Monicagate mouth-frothers are never going to vote Democratic. Neither Bernie nor HRC.

However, Republican women may cross over and vote for HRC if she is the nominee if Trump et al. continues to blame Hillary for Bill's infidelity.

Will get you a link in a minute

GOP women urge Trump to drop talk of Bill Clinton sex scandals
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/01/06/trump-bill-clinton-sex-scandals-republican-women/78352482/

Republican women have a message for Donald Trump: Enough with Bill Clinton’s sex scandals.

It’s not that they’re waving Trump off the issue to help Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. On the contrary, they’re worried that the more Trump talks about a troubled period of the Clintons’ marital history, the more likely it could backfire and rally independent and even some Republican women to the side of the former first lady.

<snip>

Women voters are likely to recoil over Trump’s contention in recent interviews that the former first lady was an “enabler” of her husband’s liaisons, including his affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, said Nancy Dwight, a former National Republican Congressional Committee executive director.

“I’m uncomfortable with it, I just am,” Dwight said, adding that she particularly didn't like a candidate discussing it. “She was as aghast by her husband’s behavior as the rest of us," she said of Clinton. The Democratic front-runner has "a ton of trip-ups” that’ll be ignored if Bill Clinton's past becomes a dominant theme.

<snip>

randys1

(16,286 posts)
104. EXACT words I heard from a teaparty rightwing racist on another board.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:52 PM
Jan 2016

DU and rightwing boards are now indistinguishable

the longer the owners of this board allow this, the more actual liberals will be silenced here

randys1

(16,286 posts)
149. NO, I wont link rightwingers on other boards, that you dont believe what I am saying
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jan 2016

is amazing

So you are both calling me a liar and implying that rightwingers arent attacking Hillary

wow

this place has jumped the shark

anybody know a place liberals can meet and talk safely ???

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
150. No. I just asked you to back your statement up.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:38 PM
Jan 2016

The rest of your post is just hysterical hyperbole....

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
154. No. I am on record asking you to back up your assertion.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jan 2016

You however, are apparently on record as saying that DU is no different than those "right wing racist" boards you like to hang out on. Right?

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
112. Oh yay, another blame Hillary..
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jan 2016

cuz Bill couldn't keep it in his pants. That's so 1950's or caveman like....

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
132. Did you actually read what I wrote?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:33 PM
Jan 2016

Here, lets read it together:


If you send Bill Clinton out as your surrogate then Bill Clinton's record is fair game. I suggest stop whining every time Bill's penis problem gets mentioned. Quite frankly that is the least of his problems.

1. The only thing Hillary Clinton is being blamed for there is "send(ing) Bill Clinton out".
2. Bill's well documented penis problem is, according to what was written there, the least of his problems.
3. The actual point is the suggestion that Clinton supporters should stop whining about people who attack Bill Clinton, or how Bernie Sanders deals with questions about Bill Clinton, as that is clearly part of the price the Hillary Clinton campaign has to pay for using Bill Clinton as a spokesperson.

Is that clear yet? Should I break it down for you further?

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
136. Here:
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:37 PM
Jan 2016
I suggest stop whining every time Bill's penis problem gets mentioned


Don't give a fuck how far you break it down. You wrote that. That's all I needed to read. Clear enough.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
119. Wow, this board has really become a cesspool.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jan 2016


Some of you need to grow some class and remember that this is still a Democratic board and that there are three candidates running for president. The supporters of these three people should treat them and each other with a little more respect.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
173. Fuck that noise. Bill's not running for anything and pretending he doesn't have major flaws
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:01 PM
Jan 2016

makes Dems look like idiotic sycophants.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
130. Are folks on DU
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:20 PM
Jan 2016

Really attacking Bill Clinton? He's probably the best president since, who, FDR? And certainly more popular than any current candidate. Bill Clinton saved this fucking party after that disaster Carter (who had some good moments).

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
141. I will have to work until I reach at least 70...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:41 PM
Jan 2016

... because of the things Bill Clinton pushed and did while in office. I was set to retire comfortably at 62.

Perhaps my perspective of him being "probably the best president since, who, FDR" isn't quite the same as yours.

Ya think?

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
171. As Christopher Hitchens said, Bill got things passed that republicans....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jan 2016

... could only dream about...

kath

(10,565 posts)
145. Bill Clinton did NOT save this party -in fact he did incredible damage to it with the goddam DLC
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jan 2016

Bullshit, and damage to the 99% with so many of his disastrous policies: http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/15-ways-bill-clintons-white-house-failed-america-and-world

"Best president since, who, FDR?"my ass.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
146. Oh, baloney. I supported Clinton at the time, but lets not whitewash his record.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jan 2016

His presidency hasn't held up so well in retrospect.

I think History will judge Obama as a more quietly transformative President who saw greater positive change in this nation AND helped us recover from a far deeper economic disaster.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
155. I had a young family during his term
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:48 PM
Jan 2016

...nothing but opportunity and upward mobility in that economy.

I think it's easily forgotten how many sectors of the the average working-class public saw their incomes and standard of living improve dramatically during that near-decade.

The revisionism which focuses on those who didn't benefit is certainly important to the individuals affected, but it's sophistry to portray that period as some economic failure.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
157. Im not portraying it as a failure. The 90s were exciting and saw some real prosperity.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:53 PM
Jan 2016

But much of that was due to the internet and tech advancements, which Bill Clinton wasnt responsible for, and which in fact in some areas (in his go along to get along mode with the Gingrich congress) attempted to stymie through things like communications decency acts, clipper chips, and the like.

Fortunately the authoritarians decisively lost those battles, and silicon valley won.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
169. Where has Gennifer Flowers gone? long time ago. Where have all the husbands gone?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jan 2016

gone for blowjobs every one.

only a selfish pig would put his rocks over national interest as sitting POTUS.
thats the problem.
thats the disgrace.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
179. but she sure bears the shame of being his wife, and its not an act of heroism
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 08:49 AM
Jan 2016

Wonder what possessed Tipper Gore to divorce Al?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If you send Bill Clinton ...