Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
149 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the BS'ers are throwing PP under the bus? (Original Post) trumad Jan 2016 OP
Not all of us, not even most of us, just the usual obnoxious cranks geek tragedy Jan 2016 #1
Unreal! trumad Jan 2016 #2
+1 emulatorloo Jan 2016 #8
LOL.. as usual you hit the nail on the head. lol Cha Jan 2016 #16
+1 JoePhilly Jan 2016 #46
You described it well geek tragedy mcar Jan 2016 #68
+1 joshcryer Jan 2016 #73
+1! Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #76
I am a fan Number23 Jan 2016 #101
Thx, feeling is mutual nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #119
+1,000 Hekate Jan 2016 #132
yup. They have been doing the same shit for years JI7 Jan 2016 #105
You are most emphatically someone I should have referred to in my previous post Number23 Jan 2016 #107
thank you JI7 Jan 2016 #111
You and I are just about always on the same page Number23 Jan 2016 #120
And you don't get this crap IRL. joshcryer Jan 2016 #146
this is how i know these people are not involved in much outside the internet JI7 Jan 2016 #149
Another +1 Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #116
Ahh, the voice of reason..where have you been all my life randys1 Jan 2016 #127
+1 for you, and Josh.... MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #143
No. The vast majority of Sanders supporters are doing no such thing cali Jan 2016 #3
Yep, and again and again its ugly. Iliyah Jan 2016 #4
Bullshit. The vast majority of DU Sanders supporters support PP cali Jan 2016 #7
Of course, and the majority of DU Bernie supporters who support PP need to push back emulatorloo Jan 2016 #12
Please see post 101 Number23 Jan 2016 #102
If one said it, we all said Hillary cult thought. JRLeft Jan 2016 #28
I would say the exact opposite is the real truth. 99Forever Jan 2016 #5
Well, see, Bernie didn't get the PP endorsement leftofcool Jan 2016 #6
Horse shit. But then when I congratulated Clinton on the endorsement cali Jan 2016 #9
It's been fun to watch, trumad. Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #10
I would add Hilary's supporters at DU are an embarrassment bobGandolf Jan 2016 #43
Of course you would. Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #45
They are a HUGE embarrassment. Crapping all over BLM until one BLM group endorsed Bernie stevenleser Jan 2016 #89
It was surreal. And what was so astonishing is I think they genuinely believe that no one saw that Number23 Jan 2016 #103
I'm beginning to sense a pattern... Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #110
Rep Lewis. Sheepshank Jan 2016 #123
Don't let a narrative get in the way of reality. HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #11
Really? leftofcool Jan 2016 #13
One thread does not a concensus make. HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #14
One thread with 153 recs... trumad Jan 2016 #17
And if you read down that thread HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #18
153 recs trumad Jan 2016 #19
One of those recs is mine, and I'm proud of it. bvar22 Jan 2016 #35
I don't believe you support Sanders. joshcryer Jan 2016 #95
+1 So perfect! MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #144
This message was self-deleted by its author bvar22 Jan 2016 #148
I recced that thread, I support Bernie and PP. Autumn Jan 2016 #133
Yeah, really. cali Jan 2016 #15
that may have changed once they found out that the endorsement was possibly bought 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #20
Uh huh trumad Jan 2016 #25
The ease at which you drag this woman's name though the sufrommich Jan 2016 #27
and they have never endorsed anyone in the primaries until Hillary 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #31
Ugh. I'm sorry I even replied to this shit.nt sufrommich Jan 2016 #32
as am I 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #34
If she went to work for Bernie, they'd be high fiving over it. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #50
If Bernie had received this endorsement the responses would be like.......... leftofcool Jan 2016 #71
I am not sorry you did because your first response to that person was pure genius. randys1 Jan 2016 #129
I agree. cali Jan 2016 #53
so why endorse in the primary? That's what even the worst of Bernie supporters are on about. MrChuck Jan 2016 #56
The one who has the "great record" is Hillary, thank you.No one wants to touch women's health rights Hekate Jan 2016 #137
None of that matters to the many cranks that Geek Tragedy referenced upthread. stevenleser Jan 2016 #124
And unless they are Rove plants, do they not understand the death that will occur if randys1 Jan 2016 #130
Amen. Nothing matters except tearing down Democrats. Hekate Jan 2016 #135
That's fucking ridiculous. She's well qualified and it's nuts to think cali Jan 2016 #51
uh huh 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #72
It is not big deal. A kid wants to work in politics and get some experience. I can easily see a LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #69
the 'kid' was Tim Kaine's press secretary nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #83
So? LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #86
This isn't a case of a 'kid' being handed a position to geek tragedy Jan 2016 #88
She's well qualified for the job. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #97
PP's PAC overplayed its hand - and like DWS is feeling the popular backlash. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #21
Oh but according to some in this thread---it's a minority. trumad Jan 2016 #26
that's the thing, we don't coordinate. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #33
Coordination goes on at some sites behind closed doors . I don't know of any Sanders site Autumn Jan 2016 #39
nor do I, but then I don't really frequent his sites. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #40
Is that what camp Clinton's keyboard warriors do: co-ordinate? Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #80
I just came off of suspension trumad Jan 2016 #81
Sort of a self fulfilling prophecy thing you've got Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #121
That goes both ways mythology Jan 2016 #122
Oh Trumad probably does have a target on his back. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #125
What backlash? MoonRiver Jan 2016 #94
PP deals with DEATH THREATS on a daily basis, some of which are carried out. Hekate Jan 2016 #138
The cancelled donations is what I refer to. eom Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #147
Yes, also the DNC, head of the DNC, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Howard Dean, ucrdem Jan 2016 #22
Nope, not all of us anyway. MuseRider Jan 2016 #23
Nice post... one_voice Jan 2016 #61
Petulant children who've never financially supported a liberal organization... OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #24
oh darn, now you've hurt us. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #36
A perfectly illustrative response. OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #42
Please, you are not better than a single person on this site or elsewhere 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #44
Well, I'm not a petulant child. I'm content to use that as a metric. OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #62
You can post, but your name calling does say you are the child. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #64
Fascinating. OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #74
uh huh go with that. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #77
I just did. OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #82
ok, thats the best you got then 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #84
I'm donating a hundred bucks to PP RIGHT NOW. joshcryer Jan 2016 #93
Post it anyway. Number23 Jan 2016 #106
Thank you. OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #114
very few are - most of us still support Planned Parenthood Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #29
The loud mouthed ones here are. MoonRiver Jan 2016 #30
I don't doubt at all that Bernie still supports pp 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #38
There are many more Hillary supporters than Bernie supporters. MoonRiver Jan 2016 #41
so there you go. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #47
Majority rules MoonRiver Jan 2016 #52
so according to you this is all working out well for pp 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #66
What's working out well? MoonRiver Jan 2016 #78
the supposed backlash to pp 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #79
I just don't think this outrage will amount to much. MoonRiver Jan 2016 #87
"when this cause stepped so quickly into the mud" LOLZ.After a century of being jailed, harrassed... Hekate Jan 2016 #139
No. All the posts I have seen express some degree of disappointment but they still Autumn Jan 2016 #37
Is being pissed at them and disagreeing with something they did, the same as tossing under the bus? Armstead Jan 2016 #48
I am not in either camp. dogman Jan 2016 #49
Somebody posted the text of the endorsement in another thread. stone space Jan 2016 #126
Pretty much RandySF Jan 2016 #54
I'm a Bernie supporter Blue_In_AK Jan 2016 #55
Nah, there's literally only one source for it anywhere on the internet... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #57
I havent' seen it? Have you? aikoaiko Jan 2016 #58
Nevermind, I see that you are on time out already. aikoaiko Jan 2016 #100
I'm donating to congressional candidates who support continued funding of Planned Parenthood which Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #59
I would have not made an endorsement until the primary winner was clear DFW Jan 2016 #60
I just looked at the "Donner Party" thread.. pangaia Jan 2016 #63
How would you react if Planned Parenthood endorsed George Pataki? Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #65
Oh so Hillary is Pataki? trumad Jan 2016 #67
Hillary Clinton isn't even Bill Clinton (let along Pataki). Ideologically, Hillary is about midway Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #70
You mean the same guy that believes the smear against PP trumad Jan 2016 #75
what if "B-e-r-n-i-e" was pronounced "Hillary?" nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #85
LMAO. Reminded me of this... stevenleser Jan 2016 #90
I stand with Planned Parenthood Gothmog Jan 2016 #91
They are not Sanders supporters. joshcryer Jan 2016 #92
"Fuck---maybe I should stay suspended by DU." SixString Jan 2016 #96
Seems DUers are thin skinned about being ratfucked. joshcryer Jan 2016 #98
They certainly are. So many rodents, so little time. Hekate Jan 2016 #140
Perfect song for the occasion aikoaiko Jan 2016 #108
PP was lauded when they posted a positive article about Bernie back in NOV. Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #99
Great catch, Starry Number23 Jan 2016 #109
Perhaps it was all part of The Plan!11 Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #115
This shit is crazy. joshcryer Jan 2016 #113
PP: quite literally in the crosshairs, but everyone I've pointed that out to has not answered. Hekate Jan 2016 #141
Great catch. BTW, think about what it means for PP to make their first EVER endorsement randys1 Jan 2016 #134
For the record, I have no problem with it. PP can endorse as they choose. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #104
So???..an endorsement does not have anything to do with what Planned Parenthood does to help people. Stuart G Jan 2016 #112
I'm sure you'll oblige soon enough Capt. Obvious Jan 2016 #117
LOL Capt. Obvious Jan 2016 #118
No. But I'm very disappointed with that endorsement Matariki Jan 2016 #128
No. Maybe some are. A small few. lovemydog Jan 2016 #131
It will be both hilarious and sad Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #136
This place is making me poor. wildeyed Jan 2016 #142
Well - you sure jumped back in it SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #145
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. Not all of us, not even most of us, just the usual obnoxious cranks
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jan 2016

who have decided to use Bernie's campaign as a weapon in their own private war against reality

Number23

(24,544 posts)
101. I am a fan
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

May not mean much to you, but just a few days ago I was talking about how you and a few other Sanders supporters have always stood up against the loud and frequent attacks against minorities here.

I appreciate that immensely.

Edit: And I just noticed that emulator and josh were two of the folks high fiving your post. I sincerely appreciate all of you.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
107. You are most emphatically someone I should have referred to in my previous post
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:57 PM
Jan 2016

about Sanders supporters who have very clearly and loudly taken issue with the frequent attacks on minority posters and positions here.

I appreciate you too.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
111. thank you
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:08 PM
Jan 2016

On this site i can't even relate to many who claim to support him.

Too many conspiracy theory types. And obsession with going after other democrats rather than doing anything for the candidate they say they support.

After this election and years from now it will be the same thing from them. Look back on many of their older posts . The same shit back then also.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
120. You and I are just about always on the same page
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jan 2016

And we certainly are on this point:

obsession with going after other democrats rather than doing anything for the candidate they say they support.

Yep. And you're right. None of this new and in fact has been going on for YEARS.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
146. And you don't get this crap IRL.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:51 AM
Jan 2016

So you know it's not originating from real life, substantial, supporters. Imagine if a Sanders supporter wore a t-shirt to a meetup saying "I'm not donating to Planned Parenthood because of their endorsement!" or some shit like that. Do you know how quickly that person would be ostracized, completely avoided?

Meanwhile if Sanders loses this thing (I'm not deluded, I know he's a long shot), and endorses Clinton, every smear that they use for Clinton supporters would apply to Sanders. Every single smear, because he'll be supporting Clinton. If that happens and Sanders goes on to stump for Clinton even 1/10th of the effort she expended for Obama in 2008 (no one should ever forget how gracefully she bowed out and how strong she campaigned, with Bill's reticence), he'll be nothing less than a "Clinton champion." How do you think his online "supporters" will react to that?

JI7

(89,249 posts)
149. this is how i know these people are not involved in much outside the internet
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:38 AM
Jan 2016

people who support him aren't obsessed with who the DNC Chair is . they are talking about Sanders himself and why he should be president. why they want him to be president. and it has nothing to do with hillary or others being evil.

it's about what they like about sanders himself.

when i saw many of the worst "sanders supporters" online push the 9/11 conspiracy theories i knew these people were not really about supporting him. they have another agenda and using him to push it.

 

MeNMyVolt

(1,095 posts)
143. +1 for you, and Josh....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:51 PM
Jan 2016

... and Randy, Emul, Tom R..... I could go on and on. Lot's of great SBS supporters on this board.

emulatorloo

(44,121 posts)
12. Of course, and the majority of DU Bernie supporters who support PP need to push back
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jan 2016

against the loud minority of those Sanders supporters who are making outrageous claims about PP.

JMHO of course.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
5. I would say the exact opposite is the real truth.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:46 PM
Jan 2016

You remember that, doncha?

Truth instead of "truthiness?"

Perhaps not.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
6. Well, see, Bernie didn't get the PP endorsement
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jan 2016

Now, that got some people really upset and now they want to with hold funds which they think will actually hurt PP/Hillary. They didn't know that the rest of us would just triple or quadruple our donations to make up the difference. Welcome back

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. Horse shit. But then when I congratulated Clinton on the endorsement
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jan 2016

And said I it doesn't alter my support, you said essentially, that I was lying and begrudged the endorsement.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
10. It's been fun to watch, trumad.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jan 2016

I have absolutely no problem with Bernie, but his supporters at DU are an embarrassment.

bobGandolf

(871 posts)
43. I would add Hilary's supporters at DU are an embarrassment
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

There are supporters from both camps have been an embarrassment on DU.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
89. They are a HUGE embarrassment. Crapping all over BLM until one BLM group endorsed Bernie
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:39 PM
Jan 2016

upon which time they promptly reversed course, was the beginning of it.

That initial attack on BLM set the tone for everything that happened afterward. Unfortunately, that was much more than his supporters on DU. I think that somewhere around half his supporters, beyond DU, are like that.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
103. It was surreal. And what was so astonishing is I think they genuinely believe that no one saw that
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:52 PM
Jan 2016
Crapping all over BLM until one BLM group endorsed Bernie upon which time they promptly reversed course, was the beginning of it.

And it wasn't a BLM "group" at all. It has been a small number of individual members.

All while simultaneously shrieking endlessly about "Camp Weathervane."
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
11. Don't let a narrative get in the way of reality.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:52 PM
Jan 2016

Most Bernie supporters here are just fine with PP. Sure, they disagree with the endorsement, but they don't have any problems with the organization itself.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
18. And if you read down that thread
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jan 2016

You'll notice that a lot of people are disappointed by what's happening to PP regarding the endorsement and that many are advocating donating to both Bernie and PP. Even the OP shares their disappointment.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
35. One of those recs is mine, and I'm proud of it.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

I support both PP and Bernie Sanders.
I believe it was a mistake for PP to endorse anybody. I had always seen them as a non-partisan group in Democratic Primaries. (This IS their first Primary endorsement).

Not anymore. They have hitched their wagon to the Conservative Democrats now, and
I don't believe they will be able to "unhitch" it.
That was a huge mistake.

I will continue to support Planned Parenthood, but will make my displeasure with their meddling in Primary Party Politics known.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
95. I don't believe you support Sanders.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:58 PM
Jan 2016

If Sanders got the endorsement you wouldn't be complaining about meddling.

Response to joshcryer (Reply #95)

Autumn

(45,082 posts)
133. I recced that thread, I support Bernie and PP.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jan 2016

Don't like the idea of them endorsing during the primary, which is something they have never done before, they have always stood above it all. Damn proud of that rec, gonna go kick it now.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
20. that may have changed once they found out that the endorsement was possibly bought
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jan 2016

pp bigwig's daughter apparently working for Hillary? Does seem like a conflict of interest situation, but they waded in anyway and endorsed prior to the primary being concluded. I imagine most financial supporters will realign with pp but many want to show that they should be considered as well.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
27. The ease at which you drag this woman's name though the
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jan 2016

mud is truly disturbing. Lily Adams has a long history of working on democratic campaigns,her mother has fought for reproductive rights her whole adult life,her grandmother was governor of Texas and an icon in the woman's rights movement. That's 3 goddamned generations of women who have fought for democrats and women. This disgusts me beyond belief.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
31. and they have never endorsed anyone in the primaries until Hillary
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:25 PM
Jan 2016

hires the daughter. I find that a little too cozy and convenient and oh so much like what Hillary does.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
71. If Bernie had received this endorsement the responses would be like..........
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jan 2016

"See, we told you Bernie was better on women's issues because PP endorsed him."

randys1

(16,286 posts)
129. I am not sorry you did because your first response to that person was pure genius.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jan 2016

I LOVED this part

"The ease at which you drag that Woman's name through the mud"

brilliant prose, right to the god damn point...

I am now a fan

MrChuck

(279 posts)
56. so why endorse in the primary? That's what even the worst of Bernie supporters are on about.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:55 PM
Jan 2016

You don't arrive at a place in your life where you support Sanders as a candidate and simultaneously seek to dismantle an agency like PP. If you do then you are extremely on the rare.
So what could motivate this backlash? Could it be that the endorsement is a slap in the face to TWO other democratic candidates that have great records standing up for women's rights and PP?
It's dirty fucking pool and that's why people are mad.

Hekate

(90,681 posts)
137. The one who has the "great record" is Hillary, thank you.No one wants to touch women's health rights
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jan 2016

...at all. Most of the men in Congress, even Dems, are oh so squeamish when it comes to the full range of women's necessary health care. Mr Chuck.

PP is constantly under attack, often physical and deadly attack. Who stood up for them in Congress, even testifying before their all-male committee? Hillary Clinton, that's who.

You say: "It's dirty fucking pool and that's why people are mad." You bet it is. Just coming the other way.



 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
124. None of that matters to the many cranks that Geek Tragedy referenced upthread.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:53 PM
Jan 2016

That group of Sanders supporters is ready to throw anyone under the bus at anytime if they dare endorse someone other than Saint Bernard. And they are just as ready to reverse course if some of that group endorse Bernie, as we saw with BLM.

They're not just cranks, depending on the person, cranks can be somewhat funny or interesting.

This particular group of Sanders supporters are mean, angry, rabid cranks.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
130. And unless they are Rove plants, do they not understand the death that will occur if
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jan 2016

the GOP takes the WH?

Do they think that is hyperbole by folks like me?

Are they that out of touch?

Maybe they should look at Flint MI, do they YET have water?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
51. That's fucking ridiculous. She's well qualified and it's nuts to think
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jan 2016

that there's any conflict of interest

LiberalArkie

(15,715 posts)
69. It is not big deal. A kid wants to work in politics and get some experience. I can easily see a
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jan 2016

young woman choosing to want to work for Hillary real easily. As for the organization supporting HRC for the primary, so what. Even if throwing PP's support behind HRC was necessary to get Lily Adams the job with HRC, I still do not see a problem. None of them are holders of any political office at this time. I have know plenty of business people hire business friends kids for jobs.

As far as "OMG Bernie won't support PP now", I really can't see him ever not supporting Planned Parenthood and especially women rights.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
88. This isn't a case of a 'kid' being handed a position to
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:33 PM
Jan 2016

get experience. It's a highly qualified operative joining a campaign.

This is Ann Richards's granddaughter-she was born into political activism.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
21. PP's PAC overplayed its hand - and like DWS is feeling the popular backlash.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jan 2016

How biased and tunnel-visioned does a PAC have to be not to see that coming?

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
26. Oh but according to some in this thread---it's a minority.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jan 2016

But according to you---it's a popular backlash.

You BS'ers need to coordinate a bit better.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
33. that's the thing, we don't coordinate.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jan 2016

It's a group composed of individuals that often see the same bullshit smeared on the wall.

Autumn

(45,082 posts)
39. Coordination goes on at some sites behind closed doors . I don't know of any Sanders site
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jan 2016

that has secret rooms.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
40. nor do I, but then I don't really frequent his sites.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jan 2016

I'm voting for him, no matter what. I do get facebook feeds from his site though.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
80. Is that what camp Clinton's keyboard warriors do: co-ordinate?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jan 2016

That explains the concerted alert-stalking of late.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
121. Sort of a self fulfilling prophecy thing you've got
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jan 2016

going there. Your own behavior reinforces your belief that you are being persecuted. You do realize that there is a simpler explanation that fits the data, right?

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
122. That goes both ways
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:42 PM
Jan 2016

There are a lot of Sanders supporters who claim they are alert stalked and refuse to acknowledge that sometimes individual posters go too far and get the requisite number of hides.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
125. Oh Trumad probably does have a target on his back.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:54 PM
Jan 2016

So do I, so does just about everyone who posts in GDP, but the point is that he goes out of his way to make blatant personal attacks, so he gets hides a lot and as I now see he is back on another time out. He seems to think he is a special victim when instead he just makes himself an easy target.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
94. What backlash?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:53 PM
Jan 2016

Do you think the whining by some on DU is going to in any way effect the good work done by PP? Seriously rofl!

Hekate

(90,681 posts)
138. PP deals with DEATH THREATS on a daily basis, some of which are carried out.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:09 PM
Jan 2016

Even staffers' kids get stalked. You really think this internet hoo-ha is going to bother them?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
22. Yes, also the DNC, head of the DNC, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Howard Dean,
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

John Lewis, and most of the Democratic congressional delegation. That's a big bus.

MuseRider

(34,109 posts)
23. Nope, not all of us anyway.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

I see no reason to stop health care for those who need PP to provide it just because they support someone I do not. Talk about hurting your own cause.

I said on an earlier thread that I would suspect that Bernie and Jane Sanders donate to PP (I do NOT know this but it would be something likely). Does anyone think for one minute he would stop donating to them because of this? I don't.

I think this is ridiculous, it is kinda sad for me since I do not support Hillary but it makes sense and I cannot even imagine not donating to them. My husband was going to stop our donations, I am just very glad I was sitting here when he said he was going to do that. Even he was reasonable when I brought this up.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
61. Nice post...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:03 PM
Jan 2016
Talk about hurting your own cause.


Exactly. ^^^

Planned Parenthood helps the people that Democrats are supposed to help.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
24. Petulant children who've never financially supported a liberal organization...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:17 PM
Jan 2016

threatening to continue to do the same.

Color me unimpressed.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
44. Please, you are not better than a single person on this site or elsewhere
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

so take your holier than thou name calling and place it elsewhere.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
62. Well, I'm not a petulant child. I'm content to use that as a metric.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:07 PM
Jan 2016

And I'm perfectly happy posting here, thank you.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
64. You can post, but your name calling does say you are the child.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:10 PM
Jan 2016

rather than those of us you refer to.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
74. Fascinating.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jan 2016

An observation that there are petulant children posting here is "name calling". "Name calling" makes me a "child". Which is, of couse, absolutely not "name calling".

You funny.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
84. ok, thats the best you got then
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jan 2016

I will end it here. I know you won't be able to stop yourself from answering and continuing this silly game, so I am letting you know that you can go ahead and get last word just so we can end it. have fun with it.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
29. very few are - most of us still support Planned Parenthood
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:24 PM
Jan 2016

But, do not agree with PP's endorsement of Hillary.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
38. I don't doubt at all that Bernie still supports pp
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jan 2016

and as I have said previously, I am sure most of his supporters do as well. However I do not blame pp contributors in withholding their money for another cause when this cause stepped so quickly into the mud. I guess they could just say "hey cut it out" but money does seem to talk. It's their right to withhold or not, however most will most likely continue as before.

pp should have endorsed the democrat after the primary, but suddenly they wanted to inject themselves into this and after Clinton hires the daughter?

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
41. There are many more Hillary supporters than Bernie supporters.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:39 PM
Jan 2016

I'm sure that PP will see a net gain in contributions after it's endorsement. I gave to them immediately after learning about it.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
66. so according to you this is all working out well for pp
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jan 2016

so why are people spending so much time trying to convince others how terrible they are if they want to change their donation?

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
79. the supposed backlash to pp
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jan 2016

for selling themselves to Clinton and apparently angering people. So am I mistaken? Didn't you say that there are many more Hillary supporters who essentially are more than making up for any donations withheld by the offended? Maybe I got it mixed up.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
87. I just don't think this outrage will amount to much.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 05:21 PM
Jan 2016

I do believe it is sickening how some will turn on an icon of liberal support for women because of politics.

Hekate

(90,681 posts)
139. "when this cause stepped so quickly into the mud" LOLZ.After a century of being jailed, harrassed...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

...beaten, sued, and MURDERED, you say Planned Parenthood leadership has "stepped quickly" into this particular action?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
48. Is being pissed at them and disagreeing with something they did, the same as tossing under the bus?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jan 2016

dogman

(6,073 posts)
49. I am not in either camp.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

But it sure appears to me that the BS and MOM supporters were thrown under the bus by PP. Some supported PP but it ignored that support and ignored tradition by supporting a candidate in the primary. I don't blame PP but I think it should be looking for better leadership.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
126. Somebody posted the text of the endorsement in another thread.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:03 PM
Jan 2016
But it sure appears to me that the BS and MOM supporters were thrown under the bus by PP.


Nobody was thrown under the bus by PP.



RandySF

(58,806 posts)
54. Pretty much
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jan 2016

Never mind what PP does for women every day. Some people want to cut ff contributions over presidential candidates.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
55. I'm a Bernie supporter
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:53 PM
Jan 2016

who also supports Planned Parenthood. Of course the organization is free to endorse whomever they choose, but I personally find it somewhat questionable that the endorsement was given after Cecile Richards' daughter was hired by Hillary's campaign. One or the other - but both together gives the appearance of quid pro quo, whether or not intended.

This is my concern with Sec. Clinton's candidacy - whether or not justified, her negatives are real.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
57. Nah, there's literally only one source for it anywhere on the internet...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:57 PM
Jan 2016

...that's hardly proof of anything. Sanders supporters think it's a bonehead move but that's about it.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
59. I'm donating to congressional candidates who support continued funding of Planned Parenthood which
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:00 PM
Jan 2016

seems to be a good way to support Planned Parenthood.

DFW

(54,378 posts)
60. I would have not made an endorsement until the primary winner was clear
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:03 PM
Jan 2016

However, there is NO WAY in the world I will stop supporting PP. They do too much good for this to make that kind of difference.

Besides, I agree with the majority of Sanders supporters and the rest: first off, the endorsement, no matter how misguided, is nowhere near enough of an issue to make me stop supporting all the good work PP does. Second, if PP had endorsed Sanders, there would have been nothing but jubilation among his supporters, although the smart ones would be saying exactly the same thing they are saying now--they did not agree with PP making an endorsement at this early stage, no matter who it was they endorsed.

And I don't care what anyone says, I still love Cecile!

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
63. I just looked at the "Donner Party" thread..
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jan 2016

here....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027513642

Which is quite hilarious, BTW.

Much of THIS thread about throwing PP under the bus reminds me
of this reply on THAT Donner thread.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
70. Hillary Clinton isn't even Bill Clinton (let along Pataki). Ideologically, Hillary is about midway
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jan 2016

between Pataki and Sanders.

Pataki was the Republican candidate who had the least bad record on reproductive liberties and the most support for Planned Parenthood.

If Planned Parenthood had endorsed Pataki, how would you react?

Hekate

(90,681 posts)
140. They certainly are. So many rodents, so little time.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:27 PM
Jan 2016

And just in case your comment disappears, here it is: Seems DUers are thin skinned about being ratfucked.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
99. PP was lauded when they posted a positive article about Bernie back in NOV.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251766265

A girl could get whiplash trying to keep track of who gets to sit on the bus and who gets to sit under it.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
113. This shit is crazy.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:15 PM
Jan 2016

I got a hide for pointing it out, first hide a year. I wish the alerter had the guts to tell me who they are but I suspect it's one of my many ignored.

This tops everything though. PP has been in the crosshairs forever, and now this?

Hekate

(90,681 posts)
141. PP: quite literally in the crosshairs, but everyone I've pointed that out to has not answered.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jan 2016

Some people have gone batshit crazy.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
134. Great catch. BTW, think about what it means for PP to make their first EVER endorsement
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jan 2016

If that is in fact the case, not sure.

But if it is, think what that means.

Think about how crucial PP must see this next election.

And not that they believe Hillary is much better, if at all, than Bernie at Women's rights, but that Hillary is the best chance to defeat the political party which is on record stating they want to DESTROY Planned Parenthood.

This is no surprise.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
104. For the record, I have no problem with it. PP can endorse as they choose.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:53 PM
Jan 2016

Doesn't change the fundamentals of the work they do, or the need to support it.

Stuart G

(38,424 posts)
112. So???..an endorsement does not have anything to do with what Planned Parenthood does to help people.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jan 2016

What Planned Parenthood does..is save peoples lives, through tests and it provides free and reduced cost contraception. Shit..no one that is here should be against PP for any reason.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
128. No. But I'm very disappointed with that endorsement
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:42 PM
Jan 2016

and let them know. Especially in light of the 'kid pro quo'.

They could have waited until *after* the primary.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
136. It will be both hilarious and sad
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:01 PM
Jan 2016

watching Trump and Bernie explain away their unworkable plans in the debates.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
142. This place is making me poor.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:11 PM
Jan 2016

Every time someone calls me "oligarch" I make a small donation to Clinton. And now PP is on the gravy train. Oh well, goes to a good cause. And oligarchs like me are rolling in it

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
145. Well - you sure jumped back in it
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:37 AM
Jan 2016

first

just days before we start making the decision for our candidate, pp does something they have never done before

that in itself is enough to warrant some attention


second

they are fucked if a pug wins the whitehouse

they chose to tempt fate and do something that could piss off a group of people who will support them

stupid


third

Hillary already has more than enough garbage being thrown at her

the seeming quid pro quo that is involved makes it even worse


welcome back

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So the BS'ers are throwin...