Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

awake

(3,226 posts)
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:23 PM Jan 2016

may I suggest if you are posting an negative post about a candidate you not hide

Behind the veil of a protective "group" instead please post it on the GP primaries forum so the supporters of the other candidate can respond, I may be wrong but I thought the main reason for "groups" was the talk about your support of your candidate not to bring down the other one, Just saying.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. I think this is a very good comment. This works both ways.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jan 2016

The one thing you cant do, however, is expose the racism that exists around here, that will get you a quick hide.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
3. I disagree. One can expose bigotry, but if they call out
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

another person for it the they may get a hide.

I don't like bigots of any group.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
5. What do you disagree with? I said calling out racism here gets you a hide, has me many times
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jan 2016

all of my hides have come from that, actually.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
7. When you called out bigotry how did you handle it?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

Did you accuse anotger poster outright?

That will probably get you a hide.

awake

(3,226 posts)
6. One should be able to share their "Truth" where a response will not get a hide from a group
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jan 2016

If you think you know a "Truth" about a candidate please share it in an open forum so others can respond

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
4. I think you can still alert on threads that displease you even in protected groups.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

If that's the crux of your post anyway.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
12. I don't think we should be able to do that
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:24 PM
Jan 2016

I also don't think posters who are on time out should be able to like OPs either.

marble falls

(57,405 posts)
8. I disagree. The tone has gotten so toxic. I want all overly partisan...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:18 PM
Jan 2016

to spout their noise ONLY in protected groups.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
9. I don't post
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

negative threads about any candidate.

I have posted positive threads about the candidate I support.

I have responded to negative posts about all 3 candidates; it's hard not to, since I see more negative threads than positive.

Edited to add:

When responding to negative posts, I HAVE said negative things about one of the three candidates. That's because there are more negatives than positives to talk about from my perspective.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
11. Just don't read the opposite group's forum
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:23 PM
Jan 2016

Everyone should just stay away from each other's forums. There is nothing there but stuff that will not agree with your own truths and the both will just seem juvenal to the opposing viewpoint.


This schism may never heal or it may, but it won't before September of next year, I believe.

awake

(3,226 posts)
13. If a poster know that there will be a response to there posts that does not agree with them
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jan 2016

Then they are more than likely to think before they post and not be as aggressive as if they would be knowing only their point of view will be shown

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»may I suggest if you are ...