Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:08 PM Jan 2016

Gee...looks like the Sanders campaign is "nervous" as well...

Just got this email from the Sanders campaign:

We could come up just short

Brothers and Sisters,

Can you imagine how you'll feel on the night of the Iowa caucuses if it turns out Bernie comes up just short? After all we’ve accomplished together against impossible odds … it'd be devastating.

With your support Bernie has brought us within striking distance of winning. But the new NBC poll released just this morning shows we still have critical ground to make up in Iowa.


Now, I suppose this could just be hype to encourage contributions, but apparently the Sanders campaign doesn't resort to cheap political tactics?
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gee...looks like the Sanders campaign is "nervous" as well... (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2016 OP
Bernie has nervers of steal his campaign is not nervous it is smart awake Jan 2016 #1
Hmmm.... MrWendel Jan 2016 #9
Cool story bro Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #15
Bernie will win Ali-96 Jan 2016 #20
here's why I don't give a damn if he is or not. Bernie doesn't have roguevalley Jan 2016 #34
Of course they are, both campaigns have plenty of reason to be nervous Bjorn Against Jan 2016 #2
Exactly. tecelote Jan 2016 #23
Iowa and NH are must-wins for Sanders. Clinton can still afford to lose them. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #35
I like how you put nervous in quotes. sorta negates the meaning, doncha know. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #3
Don't look at me for money, Bernie. Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #4
Thats okay, hes getting all the money I would otherwise be giving to the DNC Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #8
And Bernie's campaign is hurting other Democrats running for congress Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #19
It's Debbie's campaign against Bernie that is hurting other Dems. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #25
^^^ THIS!!!! ^^^ nt wolfie001 Jan 2016 #30
Gotta start somewhere. NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #27
Sorry. As long as the DNC is chaired by someone who unapologetically votes to send Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #33
Maybe I should make my next donation will be in your name... cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #24
?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Lint Head Jan 2016 #5
That's very distirbing, but I can't stop looking at it Armstead Jan 2016 #12
Hahaha! Much better to be "nervous" than resigned Android3.14 Jan 2016 #6
Got the same email Progressive dog Jan 2016 #7
A lifetime in politics, but isn't politician or establishment Sheepshank Jan 2016 #10
It's even stranger that a politician, who Progressive dog Jan 2016 #11
You do understand that "politician" is a generic word, I assume Armstead Jan 2016 #14
Politician is a descriptive word, Progressive dog Jan 2016 #18
Hell, that's just a variation of the same old stuiff that comes from everybody Armstead Jan 2016 #13
I had to go to my inbox LWolf Jan 2016 #16
I got one of those too. Now, how did he get my email? leftofcool Jan 2016 #17
Sanders was the underdog from the start thesquanderer Jan 2016 #21
Being behind in 48 states is hard shenmue Jan 2016 #22
It was behind in 50 states. HubertHeaver Jan 2016 #36
We've been underdogs since day one. This is stupid. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #26
Best you can do? meh. marble falls Jan 2016 #28
Hmm ... just how did the Sanders BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #29
There is a big difference between playing catch up with the leader in the polls Kalidurga Jan 2016 #31
How odd that the underdog is behaving like an underdog. jeff47 Jan 2016 #32
The Sanders campaign knows that IA and NH are make or break. joshcryer Jan 2016 #37

awake

(3,226 posts)
1. Bernie has nervers of steal his campaign is not nervous it is smart
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jan 2016

keeping up the pressure and not "counting the chickens till they hatch"

Ali-96

(10 posts)
20. Bernie will win
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:31 PM
Jan 2016

His campaign has been run excellently and he has a passionate ever-expanding voter base. GO BERNIE

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
34. here's why I don't give a damn if he is or not. Bernie doesn't have
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:48 AM
Jan 2016

zillionaires to placate nor does he have low enthusiasm among his team or followers. Clinton should be nervous because she expected a cake walk and got this instead. She should be nervous. I think the sanders people are expectant.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
2. Of course they are, both campaigns have plenty of reason to be nervous
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jan 2016

It is far from clear who is going to win, neither campaign is inevitable and they can't take anything for granted. We have a much tighter election than many realize and both sides have plenty of reasons to be nervous.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
23. Exactly.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie has always been nervous about his odds and never called himself "Inevitable". He knew it was an uphill battle.

Being at the top now, he must be psyched. Nothing is inevitable anymore.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
35. Iowa and NH are must-wins for Sanders. Clinton can still afford to lose them.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:50 AM
Jan 2016

So if Sanders' campaign is a little nervous, I can understand: so are 99% of us!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. Thats okay, hes getting all the money I would otherwise be giving to the DNC
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jan 2016

If it wasnt being chaired by someone who advocates putting sick people in prison for using marijuana.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
19. And Bernie's campaign is hurting other Democrats running for congress
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:09 PM
Jan 2016

as all of that money is being funneled to him alone.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
25. It's Debbie's campaign against Bernie that is hurting other Dems.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jan 2016

But, that's what she does and she does it well. Republicans absolutely love the work she has done for them.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
33. Sorry. As long as the DNC is chaired by someone who unapologetically votes to send
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:59 PM
Jan 2016

Sick people to prison for using cannabis, they dont get a dime from me.

Fortunately my state Democratic party is unequivocally pro-legalization, so I will gladly support them.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
24. Maybe I should make my next donation will be in your name...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:42 PM
Jan 2016

You could be listed as a Bernie Sanders donor!

I'd do that for you.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
6. Hahaha! Much better to be "nervous" than resigned
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jan 2016

Sanders knows he has a serious shot at this, and (here's the kicker)
you know it too.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
7. Got the same email
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie has spent his whole life in politics. He raised $7.23 million between 2007 and 2012 and spent only $3.25 million towards the 2012 election. He knows how to get contributions.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
10. A lifetime in politics, but isn't politician or establishment
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:54 PM
Jan 2016

What a strange ironic use of words from Bernie supporters.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
11. It's even stranger that a politician, who
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jan 2016

has not been a Democrat for his entire long career in politics, gets so many professed Democrats to support him.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
14. You do understand that "politician" is a generic word, I assume
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:22 PM
Jan 2016

It's like temperature. There's hot, cold, lukewarm, etc.

Bernie, Hillary, Jeb, Hatch, McCain, Brown, John Lewis...etc. etc,. etc. are all politicians.

What matters is the descriptors.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
13. Hell, that's just a variation of the same old stuiff that comes from everybody
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:19 PM
Jan 2016

My Inbox would be a scary place if I took as gospel all the predictions of dire consequences if I don't vote a certain way, send money to this cause or candidate, sign this petition....etc.

I'm sure Sanders campaign is nervous. It's a tightening race.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
16. I had to go to my inbox
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jan 2016

to read that whole message. It didn't seem "nervous" to me; it seemed like a fairly standard request for a donation. It would be shocking if Sanders' campaign weren't asking, since it depends on small individual donations.

The email also said:

By all accounts, Hillary Clinton has dramatically ramped up her fundraising since we announced our record-breaking number of small-dollar, individual contributions. Earlier this week, the Clinton campaign raised almost two million dollars in one day from just three events with millionaires!

But our campaign is funded by emails like these. That’s why your contribution today is so important.


I'm surprised that you'd be getting any emails from the Sanders campaign, since I didn't think you were a supporter. You are welcome to donate to Bernie, of course, if you are worried about the campaign.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
21. Sanders was the underdog from the start
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary was expected to win everything.

So they have opposite perspectives.

For Bernie to suggest that Hillary may win is an obvious truth.

For Hillary to suggest that Bernie may win means either she really thinks she may lose, or she's just using it as a tactic to bring in more contributions, take your choice.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
31. There is a big difference between playing catch up with the leader in the polls
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 08:02 PM
Jan 2016

and being the leader in the polls and looking over your shoulder when you should be leaving everyone in the dust, but aren't.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
37. The Sanders campaign knows that IA and NH are make or break.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:25 AM
Jan 2016

They can't gain the momentum to win NV without both states, and SC is not happening. I see nothing wrong with this and it is in line with the true expectations of the campaign (and not the wide eyed aspirations of some supporters).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Gee...looks like the Sand...