Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:31 AM Jan 2016

Jane Sanders didn't cost the Archdiocese $1.5 million dollars...SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN did that

...the Archdiocese cost itself that money by sheltering and enabling the pedophile priests, when IT KNEW ALL ALONG what those monsters were doing.

The children were the victims here, not the Church.

And Jane Sanders bears no blame for what the Church did.


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jane Sanders didn't cost the Archdiocese $1.5 million dollars...SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN did that (Original Post) Ken Burch Jan 2016 OP
And monsters they are. n/t bvf Jan 2016 #1
Warning Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #2
Kick.. Segami Jan 2016 #3
What does this have to do with Burlington College? leftofcool Jan 2016 #4
Wrong topic loc - This is referring to Randy's topic about how she cost a local parish 1.5 mil. Lancero Jan 2016 #5
the property Jane Sanders was picking up was being sold by the Catholic Church. msanthrope Jan 2016 #13
Whoa!!!! Link please? NCTraveler Jan 2016 #6
+1 stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #9
She was blameless. A bunch of attack threads on her were started on 1/10. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #14
Yep. K&R 99Forever Jan 2016 #7
K & R! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #8
HELL YES! Duppers Jan 2016 #10
Did anyone make such a stupid accusation? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #11
Last Sunday night(1/10/16)there were several threads making that accusation. n/t. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #12

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
2. Warning
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:08 AM
Jan 2016

The next few weeks are going to be ugly

The polls have HRC campaign and her suppoters going crazy

We simply have to fight with the truth , and not back down


1.Contribute to Sen. Sanders campagin

2. Volunteer -take some time (if you can) phone banking, canvassing

3. Social media - (facebook , twitter, snapchat) spread the word and message (best way to get in contact with a massive amount of people) post important dates, rallies,primary dates etc.



Lancero

(3,003 posts)
5. Wrong topic loc - This is referring to Randy's topic about how she cost a local parish 1.5 mil.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:18 AM
Jan 2016

...While completely overlooking the fact that the only reason the parish had to enter the loan was to try and remake money they had to pay out in sex abuse settlements.

Randy decided to rehash that topic with a diffrient article, which is the one you're thinking of.

This here is the topic that Ken is referring to.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251993090

Hope this clears things up for you

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
13. the property Jane Sanders was picking up was being sold by the Catholic Church.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jan 2016

Very interesting players in that land deal

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. Whoa!!!! Link please?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:55 AM
Jan 2016

I had no idea she was connected to the scandal. Please back this up.

Are you saying that Jane felt it necessary to fudge documents to help regain some fund from the scandal? You are the first I have seen to make that connection. Interesting angle Ken.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
14. She was blameless. A bunch of attack threads on her were started on 1/10.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

There was never any reason to attack Jane at all.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
11. Did anyone make such a stupid accusation?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:13 PM
Jan 2016

When I see accusations like this, my first thought is "lying no-good Republicans are at it again". Please tell me we don't have any people of that caliber here.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Jane Sanders didn't cost ...