Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(41,979 posts)
Wed Feb 19, 2014, 01:39 PM Feb 2014

The attempts to shut women down continue

This short article is a bit confusing, but is have interesting stats and is a great blog


Two women who have been the subject of floods of contemptuous and dismissive abuse as part of their public life write about their experiences and point out that their experience is the cultural norm, not any outlier experience.

British academic Mary Beard in the London Review Of Books: The Public Voice of Women (summary by Caroline Davies in The Guardian)

SF writer (and past SFWA vice-president) Mary Robinette Kowal: Me, as a useful representative example

Tangentially I am reminded of many pieces I’ve been reading lately referencing the datum that once any group contains 17% or so women proportionally, men tend to perceive the gender distribution as equal, and once the proportion of women reaches more than 33% then the perception is that women are dominant in that group. According to further datapoints, the voices we hear and faces we see in public (politics, academia, the professions, the trades, entertainment etc) tend to be 17-25% female too, and this is what we are continually told is proof of a new egalitarian post-feminist status quo.
p.s.
Data! What Data Analytics Says About Gender Inequality in the Workplace
Case in point – 2008 Ms. article on gender inequity in a college athletics department.

Tangentium secundus: I can’t find the exact link now but in several articles I read last week there was mention of yet another case of a drug being recalled from sale because usage by women led to higher risks of side-effects that were not known earlier because research had only been done on male subjects. Apparently hardly anything has changed with regard to testing requirements since this article was written in 2001 – not only are drugs rarely tested on women, they are also rarely tested on children, and even more rarely tested on ethnic groupings outside the mixed-northern-European “norm”. It also jumped out at me that (according to consultant anaesthetic Anita Holdcroft) a UK Medical Research Council-funded study found that only 16 per cent of people who take part in statins trials are women.

Tangentium tertius: general interest article on R&D in pharmaceutical companies and investment hype thereof.


http://hoydenabouttown.com/20140219.16104/the-attempts-to-shut-women-down-continue/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The attempts to shut women down continue (Original Post) ismnotwasm Feb 2014 OP
Lots of great information and links. redqueen Feb 2014 #1
I feel like crap. JTFrog Feb 2014 #2
+1 Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #3
 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
2. I feel like crap.
Wed Feb 19, 2014, 07:04 PM
Feb 2014

All of my triggers have gone off and I am no longer able to hold my tongue. I will either end up with five hidden posts today or I will have to ban myself from DU for a while. Either way results in my silence. And that makes me feel like crap. Not because I feel that my voice is important. It pales in comparison to the great women of this group. I just feel sick to my stomach that I let it all get to me again.

Thank you to all of you who fight the good fight every single day. You make DU, and the world, a better place.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»The attempts to shut wome...