Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:49 AM Feb 2016

Bernie has only one litmus test. And it's not good enough.



@17:20 he reaffirms this is his line in the sand- Citizen's United and only CU.
We women and our rights are nothing but a "wedge" and he will never stick up for us when it really matters.
Fuck that.


http://watch.knpb.org/video/2365669386/
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie has only one litmus test. And it's not good enough. (Original Post) bettyellen Feb 2016 OP
? pat_k Feb 2016 #1
Bernie Sanders has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #2
As a woman and a feminist TDale313 Feb 2016 #3
No shenmue Feb 2016 #4
As a woman and a feminist BainsBane Feb 2016 #5
If the Supreme Court was something easily fixed I might agree with you, but most of the bettyellen Feb 2016 #8
very stupid thing for him to say, but in the end do I think there's a chance he would geek tragedy Feb 2016 #6
I think it likely BainsBane Feb 2016 #7
My thoughts on judicial nominees is to look at how they feel on social issues as a tell boston bean Feb 2016 #9
Clinton is utterly gutless on reproductive rights eridani Feb 2016 #10
Hillary is not gutless on reproductive rights. boston bean Feb 2016 #11
What else do you call being in favor of an amendment banning abortion if-- eridani Feb 2016 #12
She didn't call for anything and the article you are posting is regarding late term abortion. boston bean Feb 2016 #13
Any constitutional amendment putting conditions on abortion harms women's health eridani Feb 2016 #14
Please get back with me after the primaries. boston bean Feb 2016 #15
I can't believe that video was posted here ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #17
We already have a lot of "this here". But only Bernie bashing is allowed. PassingFair Mar 2016 #28
If it took into account the life and health of the mother, it would be between the woman and her doc bettyellen Feb 2016 #18
How silly.. not thinking of the big picture. Mahalo bettyellen Cha Feb 2016 #16
If the litmus test is abortion rights noamnety Mar 2016 #19
I'm sorry but I have no problem with later term abortions having LESS restrictions than they bettyellen Mar 2016 #20
Hillary is for INCREASING restrictions. noamnety Mar 2016 #21
Nope. bettyellen Mar 2016 #22
IT'S HER OWN WORDS. noamnety Mar 2016 #23
Her own words allow for late term abortions to occur under looser standards than are currently bettyellen Mar 2016 #24
This is flat out wrong. noamnety Mar 2016 #25
Rewatch yesterday's town hall and see what she thinks about late-term abortion. Svafa Mar 2016 #27
Another "not good enough Bernie" thread...how original. haikugal Mar 2016 #26
good lord. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #29

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
2. Bernie Sanders has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:06 AM
Feb 2016

...which includes his vote to repeal the Hyde Amendment.

I don't think that if he's president, he'll nominate a judge who is anti-choice.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
3. As a woman and a feminist
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:18 AM
Feb 2016

I find these kinds of attacks on Bernie pretty insulting. There's a reason to focus on Citizen's United first. Until you get the fricken money out of politics nothing else gets fixed. It poisons every other aspect of political life and decision making.

That said Bernie is not gonna nominate someone who isn't good on women's issues. He's been very good on women's issues over his career.

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
4. No
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:49 AM
Feb 2016

"Until you get the fricken money out of politics nothing else gets fixed. It poisons every other aspect of political life and decision making."

No.

You are never going to get all the money out. Also, he said what his one issue is - and it's money. Period.

Money is not the only fundamental question of human rights. You can talk about more than one thing at a time. You can talk about all kinds of justice. Not just money.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
5. As a woman and a feminist
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:08 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:52 PM - Edit history (1)

Bettyellen has every right to express her opinions. Reverence for Sanders does not take precedence over her views as a citizen. As a human being, I am insulted that so many put Sanders first and citizens last.

A rating from Planned Parenthood is based on votes on bills presented to him as a senator. His priorities are revealed through what he emphasizes. My rights didn't rate a mention in that interview, and now you insist money is more important than my standing as a equal citizen. I am not willing to erase myself from political discourse in order to satisfy one man's political ambitions. That you are determined we do so insults me as a feminist, a citizen, and a human being. I do not accept the hierarchical nature of human worth that underlies efforts to enforce absolute deference to a member of the political elite.








 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
8. If the Supreme Court was something easily fixed I might agree with you, but most of the
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:49 PM
Feb 2016

appointees will be there a generation, and there could be a few. Bernie talked about other things he would consider- that the judge not be pro- millionaire. That was it, and it is too narrow for me.
After he smeared Planned Parenthood out of nothing more than sour grapes, I am not feeling reassured he has womens' backs.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. very stupid thing for him to say, but in the end do I think there's a chance he would
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:25 PM
Feb 2016

appoint an anti-choice justice? No way.

But, not for me to say that women shouldn't demand a better answer from him.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
7. I think it likely
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:43 PM
Feb 2016

that a judge who would rule against citizen united would also uphold women's reproductive rights, but then that's just a guess on my part. Justices, after all, operate based on judicial philosophy and interpretation of the constitution, not on political opinions about issues--or at least they are supposed to.

Sanders strength is that he appears deeply committed to a single core issue, but that is also his weakness. He fits everything else into that framework, but the framework always takes precedence.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
9. My thoughts on judicial nominees is to look at how they feel on social issues as a tell
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

for how they would judge monetary issues.

I just find it a better indicator if one is more liberal on social issues, they are more likely to be more liberal on money issues. I don't see it working as well the other way around...

eridani

(51,907 posts)
10. Clinton is utterly gutless on reproductive rights
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:17 AM
Feb 2016
Hillary Clinton: I Could Compromise on Abortion If It Included Exceptions For Mother's Health

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/09/29/hillary_clinton_i_could_compromise_on_abortion_if_it_included_exceptions_for_mothers_health.html

My husband vetoed a very restrictive legislation on late-term abortions and he vetoed it at an event in the White House where we invited a lot of women who had faced this very difficult decision, that ought to be made based on their own conscience, their family, their faith, in consultation with doctors. Those stories left a searing impression on me. Women who think their pregnancy is going well and then wake up and find some really terrible problem. Women whose life is threatened if they carry their child to term, and women who are told by doctors that the child they're carrying will not survive.

Again, I am where I have been, which is that if there's a way to structure some kind of constitutional restriction that take into account the life of the mother and her health, then I'm open to that. But I have yet to see the Republicans willing to actually do that, and that would be an area, where if they included health, you could see constitutional action.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
11. Hillary is not gutless on reproductive rights.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:21 AM
Feb 2016

I can't believe you are even buying into that BS.

No one will EVER take that type of made up criticism seriously.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
12. What else do you call being in favor of an amendment banning abortion if--
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:23 AM
Feb 2016

--if there are exceptions made for life and health?

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
13. She didn't call for anything and the article you are posting is regarding late term abortion.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:26 AM
Feb 2016

But you know that. Still, want to spread this tripe around.

You've been a member in HoF a long time and I don't want to block you. But I will, if you continue to make these allegations, which are false. Womens health is way to important to have this crud being espoused here.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
14. Any constitutional amendment putting conditions on abortion harms women's health
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:30 AM
Feb 2016

I honestly don't get why Clinton thinks she will get support from RW whackos by attempting to compromise with them.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
15. Please get back with me after the primaries.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:34 AM
Feb 2016

We are not going to have this here. Maybe once the primaries end people will become a little less partisan and not so much into scoring political points for their candidate. And will be more concerned about the truth of the matter. I'm sorry..... the issue is to important to have that type of false crap being spread here.

ismnotwasm

(41,976 posts)
17. I can't believe that video was posted here
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:47 PM
Feb 2016

I've seen it before several times--it's completely out of context.

Of all things, Hillary's strength on reproductive rights and women's should not be in doubt. Th9s is just sad.

PassingFair

(22,434 posts)
28. We already have a lot of "this here". But only Bernie bashing is allowed.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:48 AM
Mar 2016

It's why I don't post here any more.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
18. If it took into account the life and health of the mother, it would be between the woman and her doc
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:26 PM
Feb 2016

- as it should be.
It's a well thought out reply to a hypothetical about constitutional restrictions on abortion.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
19. If the litmus test is abortion rights
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 07:39 AM
Mar 2016

one of the candidates just failed it.

Followed by "feminists" justifying: it's not a compromise on abortion rights, just on late term abortions.

May as well say "I'm not punching Billy. Just his face."

What happened to us???

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
20. I'm sorry but I have no problem with later term abortions having LESS restrictions than they
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:02 PM
Mar 2016

currently do- which is to make the decision between the doctor and patient with her life and health considered first. I am with Hillary on that.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
21. Hillary is for INCREASING restrictions.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:08 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie is for no restrictions.

Not sure how anyone could misinterpret that. It's not "life and health considered first." She supports a ban on late term abortions *unless* you can prove the life or health of the mother is at state. That's a national restriction which does not now currently exist.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
24. Her own words allow for late term abortions to occur under looser standards than are currently
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:37 PM
Mar 2016

allowed in the eight states where they are (too narrowly) sometimes allowed. So in all states it would be easier- including the 42 where it is now banned.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
25. This is flat out wrong.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:46 PM
Mar 2016

Currently late term abortions are allowed by federal law in all states.
And some states have enacted their own restrictions.

She supports a federal ban (where none now exists) on late term abortions, with some exemptions - that she gets to decide. This is an anti-choice position.

A federal ban - even with some narrowly defined exemptions - is MORE restrictive than not having a federal ban.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
26. Another "not good enough Bernie" thread...how original.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:49 PM
Mar 2016

I trust Bernie much more than Hillary, much more. Hillary has shown how little she regards women with her policy decisions...this is just flame-bait.

Oh, and I'm a female feminist.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Bernie has only one litmu...