Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:11 AM Jan 2016

"She voted for the Iraq War, but I have to tell you, how many years ago was that?"

And I have something to tell Karen Finney: For those who lost limbs, or suffered brain injuries, or for the families that have buried their dead...it's not "years ago". It's every damn day.



"Clinton campaign spokeswoman Karen Finney appears on MSNBC to talk about negative campaigning and Bernie Sanders ramping up his rhetoric against Hillary on the campaign trail. Finney was questioned by MSNBC host Jose Diaz Balart if it really is negative campaigning if Sanders is pointing out the truth. Finney claimed "it's not the whole truth."

KAREN FINNEY, CLINTON CAMPAIGN SPOKESMAN: I'm thinking about this. She voted for the Iraq War, but I have to tell you, how many years ago was that?

JOSE DIAZ BALART, MSNBC: But we're still talking about. It's still a political position on both sides of the aisle.

FINNEY: She's put forward a plan to deal with ISIS, and she clearly has the experience that we need to deal with the threats that we're facing around the world. Again, folks are questioning. He wants to normalize relations with Iran. And to put Iranian soldiers with, you know, in Syria, right at Israel's doorstep. Then he kind of says I didn't say that. I guess my point is Senator Sanders has had a few evolutions of his own..."

More: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/29/clinton_campaigns_finney_on_using_iraq_war_vote_against_hillary_how_many_years_ago_was_that.html

And this one comment wraps it all up nicely:

"This is along the lines of her Goldman speaking fees being "all in the past" - I don't get this line of reasoning.

She wants to run as the "experienced" candidate, but her actual experience is not subject to judgment or question because it was "long ago" (by someone's standard) - so then the question is, well if all her experience is so far in the past as to be irrelevant, does it even matter if she is experienced?"


39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"She voted for the Iraq War, but I have to tell you, how many years ago was that?" (Original Post) Contrary1 Jan 2016 OP
Disgustingly dismissive. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2016 #1
So many lives ago. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #6
Read my mind, but wrote it out better. Unbelievably callous statement. Turn CO Blue Jan 2016 #8
Yet there are many who are ready to get involved in the Middle East once again... Human101948 Jan 2016 #21
It appears there are quite a few members in the SamKnause Jan 2016 #2
"This is along the lines of her Goldman speaking fees being "all in the past" Jarqui Jan 2016 #3
..+1 840high Jan 2016 #4
Here is her problem. Perfectly stated. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #5
What a cheap hack interviewee n/t Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2016 #7
And the ISIS that it created is pretty active today jfern Jan 2016 #9
As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton gave us the disastrous Libyan War. Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #10
I am 100% sure I will have to tune out at some point, for my blood pressure. I'm just holding silvershadow Jan 2016 #11
The spinning and dishonesty from the Clinton camp is SO apparent... Old Crow Jan 2016 #12
Are people still dead and damaged and displaced? Is the Middle East still de-stablized? merrily Jan 2016 #13
Would someone who murdered people 15 years ago.... Helen Borg Jan 2016 #14
Admittedly, that rules out a large swath of Congress. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #23
The AUMF vote was wrong. There's no doubt about that. Tortmaster Jan 2016 #15
I think you're seeing what you want to see there. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #25
+1 Martin Eden Jan 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Contrary1 Jan 2016 #37
After reading his other posts, this seems to be the only issue he cares about. Contrary1 Jan 2016 #38
What a way to piss on thousands of dead American soldiers just to score a political point. arcane1 Jan 2016 #35
Timeout? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #39
It's good Chelsea came back unharmed from her stint in Iraq. jalan48 Jan 2016 #16
War is Forever ihaveaquestion Jan 2016 #17
A very cold, heartless comment from Karen Finney. democrank Jan 2016 #18
She says, "The numbers don't add up on Bernie's heath care plan." I call bullshit! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #19
K&R Mbrow Jan 2016 #20
And the Libyan one, and the 'surge', and every other possible damn bit of violence Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #22
"She has a plan to deal with ISIS" n2doc Jan 2016 #24
They have a word for " in the past ", History and if you look not to hard, hers sucks . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2016 #26
So then the lives lost because of that vote are suddenly going to come back to life? INdemo Jan 2016 #27
People are still dying because of that Clusterfuck of a decision. Maybe do yourself onecaliberal Jan 2016 #28
I lost all respect for Finney... SoapBox Jan 2016 #29
Same here! jillan Jan 2016 #31
The consequences from that vote will be felt for decades. We opened the hornet's nest. jillan Jan 2016 #30
heck, she's already making noises about rehiring "the Sunnis" to fight Iran MisterP Jan 2016 #32
just blood under the bridge tk2kewl Jan 2016 #33
HRC has no excuse for that vote. jomin41 Jan 2016 #34

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
1. Disgustingly dismissive.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:26 AM
Jan 2016

500,000 dead, 4,400 dead US soldiers, 32,000 injured US soldiers. BUT THAT WAS SOOOO LONG AGO

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
6. So many lives ago.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 04:27 AM
Jan 2016

Ask the moms and dads of the men and women who died in Iraq how long ago it was. I bet they can tell you. They'll tell you their kids were babies just yesterday.

Turn CO Blue

(4,221 posts)
8. Read my mind, but wrote it out better. Unbelievably callous statement.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 04:32 AM
Jan 2016

I usually hear at least one million Iraqis dead, but could be twice that. All those young people coming back with PSTD or their melons shaken into jelly from IEDs, missing limbs, list goes on forever. The people of Iraq having their lives torn apart, their children hit with shrapnel in front of their eyes, the infrastructure blown back to the stone age, rebuilt, bombed out again and again.

Each one affected is or was a human being, not a number -- and it doesn't matter how long ago it was.

Good judgment ALWAYS means good judgment at the time.

The streets of all the major cities on earth were literally FILLED with millions of people marching, protesting and listing out the reasons to NOT go into Iraq.
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
21. Yet there are many who are ready to get involved in the Middle East once again...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:16 AM
Jan 2016

as long as it doesn't touch them personally, war is wonderful and it shows those ragheads who's boss. Memories are short and besides we get such a warm and fuzzy feeling when we see the jets screaming over the Super Bowl and hear the gravelly voiced country singer asking us to send money to the Wounded Warrior Project. America, fuck yeah!

SamKnause

(13,103 posts)
2. It appears there are quite a few members in the
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:28 AM
Jan 2016

Democratic Party that believe in looking forward not backwards.

The establishment really does not like holding their establishment

peers accountable.

Jarqui

(10,125 posts)
3. "This is along the lines of her Goldman speaking fees being "all in the past"
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:49 AM
Jan 2016

29 Wall Street Fundraisers for Clinton since April 28, 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511090480

And they're like her speaking event fees in terms of magnitude or more

http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/article/Your-Turn-Jan-29-6791290.php

Re: “Clinton in town today for private fundraiser; Her political ties to S.A. go back to 1972,” Metro, Jan 20; and “Clinton finds S.A. supporters are ready to write her checks,” Metro, Jan. 21:

I’m sure most of us are in awe regarding the recent “reunion” of many prominent local Democrats with Hillary Clinton. Express-News staff writer John Gonzalez’s two recent articles vividly described the unrestrained excitement of former state Sen. Joe Bernal, former Mayor Henry Cisneros, activist Choco Meza and many others regarding Clinton’s San Antonio visit.

This giddiness at the prospect of seeing her is almost comical. The high schoolish reunion was a real bargain for a mere $1,000 a plate! So 250 happy faithful sent Hillary to Iowa with at least $250,000. Not bad for a couple of hours and many hugs.


(to the woman in the video) For God's sake, wake up!

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. Here is her problem. Perfectly stated.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 04:25 AM
Jan 2016

She wants to run as the "experienced" candidate, but her actual experience is not subject to judgment or question because it was "long ago" (by someone's standard) - so then the question is, well if all her experience is so far in the past as to be irrelevant, does it even matter if she is experienced?"


More: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/29/clinton_campaigns_finney_on_using_iraq_war_vote_against_hillary_how_many_years_ago_was_that.html

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
10. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton gave us the disastrous Libyan War.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 04:57 AM
Jan 2016

Now Hillary Clinton is campaigning on being more hawkish towards Iran than Bernie Sanders is.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
11. I am 100% sure I will have to tune out at some point, for my blood pressure. I'm just holding
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 05:00 AM
Jan 2016

out until after the first wave, if I can. Hoping the nominee, one way or the other, is chosen as quickly as I think he will be. Good God that woman is rather obtuse about the actual sacrifice- or is it just me?

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
12. The spinning and dishonesty from the Clinton camp is SO apparent...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 05:01 AM
Jan 2016

... I'm astounded that everyone out there isn't repelled by it. I know I am.

Dishonesty, talking out of both sides of the mouth, misrepresentations, refusal to answer simple questions--for heaven's sake, is there ANYONE who really believes this is what American politics needs MORE of?

WTF.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
13. Are people still dead and damaged and displaced? Is the Middle East still de-stablized?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 05:39 AM
Jan 2016

Is the US Treasure still depleted?

Has her judgment improved? Is she less in favor of war and regime change?

Sorry, the way her supporters try to explain away and minimize her vote and her advoacy for this war and her excuse for same is nothing short of bizarre.



Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
14. Would someone who murdered people 15 years ago....
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:07 AM
Jan 2016

Be eligible to run for President, just because it was long ago?

Tortmaster

(382 posts)
15. The AUMF vote was wrong. There's no doubt about that.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:08 AM
Jan 2016

I would suggest, however, that it was less craven than Senator Sanders’ decades-long track record of caving to the NRA because he was afraid of a few bumper stickers. From his book,

“During the 1994 campaign the NRA had played a very forceful role against me. They distributed widely a ‘Bye, Bye, Bernie’ bumper sticker.”


From 1993 to 2011 there were 13 million non-fatal gun victims in the United States. That does not count the completed suicides and murders.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
25. I think you're seeing what you want to see there.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:11 AM
Jan 2016

Bernie EASILY beat back the NRA backed candidate when they thought they were going to 'win back the office' after he was in it one term after they boosted his campaign once to oust someone else who displeased them. He was never 'afraid of a few bumper stickers'. He simply believes in the rights of hunters. And he's RIGHT to vote against holding manufacturers liable for selling legal, working products. It's a bill of attainder, and unconstitutional. We don't hold any other manufacturer of any other type of legal product liable for selling products that work as designed.

A lot of people hunt legally and safely. And defend themselves and their livestock and pets from large carnivores. There IS a place for guns in society. Just a FAR smaller one than currently exists in gun-drenched America.

Martin Eden

(12,867 posts)
36. +1
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie gets a D- from the NRA. Claiming that he's a sellout on the gun issue is a desperate grab for straws.

Here at DU we knew the case for war with Iraq was bogus, and if Hillary was fooled by GW Bush she is not qualified to be president.

Response to Martin Eden (Reply #36)

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
38. After reading his other posts, this seems to be the only issue he cares about.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:27 PM
Jan 2016

Sure, I would like to see more gun control, but I'm not about to vote for her because of that, given her views on
pretty much everything else.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
35. What a way to piss on thousands of dead American soldiers just to score a political point.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:03 PM
Jan 2016

You should be ashamed of yourself.

When your timeout is over I hope you choose not to come back

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
39. Timeout?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jan 2016

His transparency page isn't showing.

But I just remembered where I recognized that name. He's a Hill supporter popping over from Daily Kos.

democrank

(11,094 posts)
18. A very cold, heartless comment from Karen Finney.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:09 AM
Jan 2016

Another Clinton mouthpiece bragging about experience but ignoring judgment.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
19. She says, "The numbers don't add up on Bernie's heath care plan." I call bullshit!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:36 AM
Jan 2016

The savings could actually exceed any claims Bernie made.

Mbrow

(1,090 posts)
20. K&R
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:48 AM
Jan 2016

not to forget that there was plenty of info that the whole thing was a scam from the start, there was a reason people were protesting it before it got going and certain people voted against it.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
22. And the Libyan one, and the 'surge', and every other possible damn bit of violence
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:00 AM
Jan 2016

she could while she was SoS, pressuring the President to use violence as a tool every time she could.

(Disclosure: I was for AN action in Libya, to prevent what I saw as the imminent slaughter of an entire city. But, as always, America had to use a sledgehammer, rather than a flyswatter.)

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
24. "She has a plan to deal with ISIS"
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:11 AM
Jan 2016

Yep, a plan that involves more civilian casualties, more endless war in Iraq and Syria (without a formal declaration, of course) and more war mongering against Iran.

And of course, lots more $$$ for the MIC. Some undoubtedly will be passed back through to their 'foundation'

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
27. So then the lives lost because of that vote are suddenly going to come back to life?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:25 AM
Jan 2016

Her vote was soooooo many years ago?

Hillary has said many times "I have a plan" but never has the details.

Now she is saying: She's put forward a plan to deal with ISIS
Ok where are the details? She has none

I would bet she has the details on how many $$$ she received from the High Rollers in Philly though...

And then how about her favortism with the Swiss banks and getting the IRS off their ass...in exchange for a huge contribution to her"Clinton Foundation fund" Oh but that was so many years ago".

onecaliberal

(32,858 posts)
28. People are still dying because of that Clusterfuck of a decision. Maybe do yourself
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:53 AM
Jan 2016

A favor and check the suicide rate of veterans who served in those wars. Dead is forever! Should the parents of dead soldiers get over it already, please have the secretary provide us with her getting over it timeline. Breathtaking stupidity in that statement. Sick of Hillary and her smear and liar machine. She has NO clue the suffering happening today because of that war. She has no skin in the game so she has no fucks to give about it.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
29. I lost all respect for Finney...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:25 PM
Jan 2016

And I used to think she was a logical voice on MSNBC.

Now I understand she's just another paid hack, that spews whatever her employer wants her to.

Another reason I've separated myself from MSNBC.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
30. The consequences from that vote will be felt for decades. We opened the hornet's nest.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:14 PM
Jan 2016

A vote for war is the most important vote a member of the government takes.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
32. heck, she's already making noises about rehiring "the Sunnis" to fight Iran
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

IS was just a fluke, evidently, they'll calm down once we rehire their defectors

jomin41

(559 posts)
34. HRC has no excuse for that vote.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jan 2016

The truth was obvious to anyone with a brain. Her vote was either cowardly or gullible or incredibly poor judgement. In any case, not what I want in my first choice. I'm so glad we have an alternative. I'm for Bernie, the PEACE candidate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»"She voted for the Iraq W...