This is why Bernie’s the Democratic front-runner: Justice Department probe of Hillary inches closer

[silvershadow]

Bernie Sanders’ path to the presidency was never going to be easy. After surging in the polls and consistently proving America’s political establishment wrong, Sanders won Colorado and other states on Super Tuesday. He still has a path to win the Democratic nomination via the primaries, but Bernie Sanders just won the presidency for another reason: Hillary Clinton’s quest for “convenience.”

Bryan Pagliano, the person who set up Clinton’s private server and email apparatus, was just given immunity by the Justice Department. According to The Washington Post, “The Clintons paid Pagliano $5,000 for ‘computer services’ prior to his joining the State Department, according to a financial disclosure form he filed in April 2009.”

First, this can’t be a right-wing conspiracy because it’s President Obama’s Justice Department granting immunity to one of Hillary Clinton’s closest associates. Second, immunity from what? The Justice Department won’t grant immunity to anyone unless there’s potential criminal activity involved with an FBI investigation. Third, and most importantly for Bernie Sanders, there’s only one Democrat in 2016 not linked to the FBI, Justice Department, or 31,830 deleted emails.

These 31,830 deleted emails, by the way, were deleted without government oversight.
--------------------
more at link: http://www.salon.com/2016/03/03/this_is_why_bernies_the_democratic_front_runner_justice_department_probe_of_hillary_inches_closer_to_ending_clintons_campaign/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

[BigBearJohn]

1. hmmmm hmmmmm

Move along -- nothing to see here....

[PatrickforO]

2. I was very sad to find out, as these emails became public,

that it was Clinton who convinced Obama to bomb Libya and kept the coalition to get rid of Gaddafi and do a regime change.

So was this action, as Clinton proclaimed, "on the right side of history and on the right side of our values, and interests in the region?"

Well, 30,000 Libyans have died and the country is in a second civil war. Millions of refugees are flooding Europe. And, of course ISIS has arisen there.

Is 'regime change' EVER a good idea, or is it akin to the schoolyard bully attacking a weaker kid and taking their lunch money?

What IS the right side of history? I guess we could go and ask the 30,000 who have died.

Do we want someone as hawkish as Clinton in the White House? Wall Street is 'comfortable' with that, and so is the MIC because, hey, there's PROFITS to be made! But should we be comfortable with it?

I'm sure not.

[Cassiopeia]

5. Yes, regime change can be a good idea

However, it must be an idea born of the citizens the regime controls and fought by those citizens. The only way change works is because the people demand it and have a vested interest in making it work after the conflict.

[PatrickforO]

6. Well, that's what we're trying to do, isn't it?

And, admittedly, it WAS a good idea with Hitler.

[Cassiopeia]

7. Well, that's what we're trying.

I imagine the type of people that aided Hitler are likely cheering for Trump or Cruz today though.

[Helen Borg]

3. That is ANOTHER reason...

[Cassiopeia]

4. Will the MSM on our TeeVee's report on this?

The MSM is losing appeal and the power to influence, but not entirely.

I'm guessing it will go largely ignored or kept to minor 10 second blips spread out over weeks. Probably as much air time as the TPP gets.

[Major Hogwash]

8. "These 31,830 deleted emails, by the way, were deleted without government oversight."

Drip, drip, drip.

[silvershadow]

9. Deleted emails shouldn't be impossible to recover. Unless they were professionally shredded,

I would think. Will be interesting to see what that IT guy has to say.