Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 02:45 PM Jul 2015

Warren lays out her requirement for next president

PHOENIX — Elizabeth Warren on Friday delivered a progressive manifesto, laying out a bullet-pointed list of what the movement stands for, and asked her followers to demand a president who fights against undue influence in Washington’s corridors of power.

In a Netroots Nation speech tailor-made to fire up the rising liberal base, Warren named names of the movement’s foes, ridiculing former Sen. Scott Brown’s as a diet pill salesman, Sarah Palin as a YouTube hack, and the Republican field as cowards in line with Donald Trump.

And while she didn’t name any of the Democratic presidential contenders, the Massachusetts senator did lay out one requirement for the next occupant of the White House.

“I think anyone running for that job – anyone who wants the power to make every key economic appointment and nomination across the federal government – should say loud and clear that they agree: we don’t run this country for Wall Street and mega corporations. We run it for people,” she said.

Warren also marveled at how much progress has been made since her first Netroots Nation, five years ago: the new consumer agency (which is, in large part, her creation), equal marriage in every state in the union, comprehensive health care reform, and most recently Confederate flags being taken down everywhere.

The progressive folk hero inspired a grassroots campaign that unsuccessfully tried to draft her into running for president, but she still is having a big impact on the race.

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders is carrying the liberal torch among the Democratic field, and both Sanders and Warren (from the outside) have been pulling dominant front-runner Hillary Clinton to the left on social and economic issues.

On Friday, Warren, seizing her influence, laid out a path ahead for the progressive movement, which was also largely a condemnation of the Republican agenda. She called for help from workers unable to care for sick family members, a taxation system in which millionaires and billionaires pay the same rates as their secretaries, dignified retirement, transparent trade deals that work for workers, and relief for college students crushed by debt.

She attacked Republicans for standing in the way of this agenda.

House Republicans may still want to fly the Confederate flag and Republican leaders may cower in the shadow of Donald Trump, but the American people understand that Black Lives Matter and America is not a country that stands for racism, bigotry or hatred,” Warren said. “To build an economy that creates real opportunity, that doesn’t lock up millions of our fellow human beings and that uses the talents of all our people, Americans must prove that on equality and justice, the American people are Progressives.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/elizabeth-warren-netroots-nation-presidential-requirements-120298.html#ixzz3gAwsr29d

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. This is not going to be a popular prediction: I believe Warren will decide that Hillary has met all
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 03:27 PM
Jul 2015

Warren's criteria and endorse her. I don't know when that will come. However, I think it's coming. I reconciled myself to that a while back. If I am right, I'm prepared. If I am wrong, I'll be pleasantly surprised.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
2. Well...I hope you are wrong.
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jul 2015

At the worst, I hope that she just keeps doing what she's doing and holds off on any approvals.

IF she tosses her support to HRC early on...I'll lose a lot of my admiration for her.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
3. Obviously, I hope I am wrong as well. However, my post said nothing about "early on."
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 03:40 PM
Jul 2015

Thing is, she already KNOWS what Bernie stands for and she could have helped him a lot with an early endorsement. She hasn't.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
4. Same here
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 04:01 PM
Jul 2015

I can't imagine Warren supporting HRC unless she's the nominee, but I've been surprised and disappointed before.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
6. If she endorses Hillary than all of her progressive rhetoric is just that
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:19 AM
Jul 2015

rhetoric. It will show that in the end game big money wins again. Washington D.C has its set of rules that will never allow change. One can talk about change but that's all it is is talk.

It will show the corporate choke hold cannot be broken even from those that talk the talk but winning the fight is impossible.
Hillary will sound off with her rhetoric as far as the Wall Streets/corporate mafia will allow.
But in the end her progressive tone will stop and she will fall in line with all the other corporate puppets.

If Elizabeth Warren endorses Bernie Sanders than her progressive stand will be elevated to the next level by endorsing him.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
7. I agree, but I would not take what Warren does as definitive with respect to whether the
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:36 AM
Jul 2015

Wall Street choke hold can be broken. It's extremely strong and TPP will make it worse. However, there are still more of us than of them.

A thread I kicked only this morning:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1277&pid=8087

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
8. Yes ..well if Elizabeth Warren endorses Hillary,I am certainly going to
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:45 AM
Jul 2015

be disappointed none the less.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. We all will, including me. But, it is a possibility.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:09 AM
Jul 2015

I think if she intended to endorse Bernie, she would have done so by now, and be campaigning alongside him.

I know I would, if I were in her position, claiming to believe what she claims to believe.

I would not be hedging my bets (no pun intended) to see who pulled ahead or what Hillary's newly minted campaign rhetoric was going to be. I'd be doing all I could to make sure he pulled ahead.

After all, he announced he was exploring about a year ago and she knows who he is, just as she knows who Hillary is.

I hope I am wrong, but the passage of time has not been giving me a warm, fuzzy feeling.

Maybe she's playing 3 dimensional chess, though. So, I wait. I don't really have a choice anyway.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
11. I agree. I often wonder why she has remained silent so far.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:29 AM
Jul 2015

Bernie speaks to the same issues she speaks but it may be she won't endorse either. I will be disappointed if he endorses Hillary. I think Liz is smart enough to read between the lines on what Hillary says. We will see.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
10. I disagree. This is a smart lady.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:21 AM
Jul 2015

There is subtext in that speech and it's not, "I'm going to endorse Hillary." That wasn't an accident. I think she'll wait until the primaries have decided a candidate and she'll endorse that person. But, until that time, I think she'll continue to make speeches exactly like the one in the OP.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Warren lays out her requi...