Why do we kick bullshit posts by responding to them?

[Live and Learn]

I am doing my best to ignore those posts. If we all did that their posts would quickly fade in to the nether regions where they belong.

There are plenty of opportunities to answer their BS on legitimate Bernie posts which can always use a kick anyway.

[bluestateguy]

1. Kick

nt

[JackInGreen]

2. Maybe

If we feel motivated to respond only on issues not flames, make it an OP and challenge the ideas layed out in the thread you're electing not to kick? Might help to change the framing and 'battleground'.

[in_cog_ni_to]

3. I rarely post on one of their idiotic threads and

try very hard never to respond to any of their idiotic posts or replies to me. They aren't worth my time and personally, I find most of that group to be greatly disturbed. I prefer no interaction with any of them.

[Live and Learn]

4. I just hate that there are so many more of us and yet their slanderous posts

seem to dominate the forum. Much of it is due to Bernie supporters defending him but it keeps their threads at the top of the board. I'd much rather they just died quickly (the threads, that is).

[in_cog_ni_to]

7. Yes. If something has been posted & corrected by Bernie supporters a million times already, let the

one million + 1 go. They recycle every issue almost weekly. They must have a master list they run off of, because it's just a never-ending rehash of the same stuff.

If we've seen it before, let it go. Eventually they'll get bored having to talk amongst themselves.

Many of them really are deeply disturbed. Who needs that crap in their life? I know I don't!

[Enthusiast]

5. Thanks for the reminder.

[Kip Humphrey]

6. absolutely agree.

[eridani]

8. Think of the lurkers. Plenty of non-members read this site

If you demonstrate clear logic and policy advocacy, and are answered by emoticons, that is a lesson that lurkers can benefit from learning.