Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 11:33 PM Jan 2016

Just saw this in my E-mail inbox

Subject line said, "Nobody pays $300,000 to hear somebody speak."


While many Americans find it difficult to sit through a full presidential debate, Wall Street, Big Pharma, and corporate technology interests have shelled out hundreds of thousands of dollars supposedly just to hear Hillary or Bill Clinton give a speech.

According to a new report by Consortium News, Hillary Clinton took in $11.8 million in 51 speaking fees from January 2014 to May 2015, when she officially launched her presidential campaign. Bill Clinton delivered 53 paid speeches to bring in $13.3 million during that same period. That's over $25 million total, largely if not entirely from wealthy parties with a strong interest in influencing U.S. government policy.

This system of rewarding former politicians is one of the great corrupting forces in Washington, DC, but the revolving door that brings some politicians back into power makes it many times worse. It smacks of political bribery.

Click here to insist that the Clintons give their $25 million in speaking fees to good causes.

According to the Washington Post, since 1974 when Bill Clinton ran for Congress, the Clintons have raised at least $3 billion, including at least $69 million just from the employees and political action committees of banks, insurance companies, and securities and investment firms.

According to the International Business Times, the Clintons' foundation took in money from foreign nations while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, nations such as Saudi Arabia for which she then waived restrictions on U.S. weapons sales. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that Bill Clinton was receiving big speaking fees from companies, groups, and a foreign government with interests in influencing the U.S. State Department.

Click here to urge the Clintons to clear their corrupted image by donating their $25 million in recent lecture fees to organizations legitimately working for campaign finance reform, Wall Street reform, environmental protection, and peace.

Eight-digit donors to the Clintons' foundation include Saudi Arabia and Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk. Seven-digit donors include: Kuwait, ExxonMobil, Friends of Saudi Arabia, James Murdoch (son of Rupert), Qatar, Boeing, Dow, Goldman Sachs, Wal-Mart and the United Arab Emirates. Those chipping in at least half a million include Bank of America, Chevron, Monsanto and Citigroup. And they don't even get a speech!

Let's insist that the Clintons pay forward their $25 million in speaking fees from private interests to genuine public interest groups that seek to undo the damage of corporate dominance and abuse.

After signing the petition, please forward this message to your friends. You can also share it from the webpage after taking the action yourself.

This work is only possible with your financial support. Please chip in $3 now.

-- The RootsAction.org Team

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hedda_foil

(16,373 posts)
1. Hillary Clinton took in $11.8 million in 51 speaking fees from January 2014 to May 2015..
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 11:47 PM
Jan 2016

This is nauseating. From your OP.



Hillary Clinton took in $11.8 million in 51 speaking fees from January 2014 to May 2015, when she officially launched her presidential campaign. Bill Clinton delivered 53 paid speeches to bring in $13.3 million during that same period. That's over $25 million total, largely if not entirely from wealthy parties with a strong interest in influencing U.S. government policy.



But of course there's n quid pro quo, so move along, there's nothing to see here.
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
2. Nope, no Oligarchy. Just Peasants in the face of gargantuan wealth, influence and power.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 11:48 PM
Jan 2016

In another sense...it's the American Way. You, too, could be awash in cash and 6 figure speeches if you just tugged onto your bootstraps just a little bit harder.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
4. But, but, but...
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 01:44 AM
Jan 2016

They was flat busted when they left the White House (with the dishes or whatever)!

Guess they ain't so poor now.

...they make me barf.

LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
5. Interesting the Middle Eastern countries that belly up to the bar. They know exactly
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 01:54 AM
Jan 2016

which side of the bread the butter is on, and they are not worried about being visible in their bribery.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Just saw this in my E-mai...