Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,190 posts)
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:41 PM Apr 2019

BuzzFeed News: Pete Buttigieg supports religious exemptions for vaccines if herd immunity exists.

.

I shit you not:





"The law of the land for more than a century has been that states may enforce mandatory vaccination for public safety to prevent the spread of a dangerous disease. Pete does support some exceptions, except during a public health emergency to prevent an outbreak," a spokesperson for the South Bend, Indiana, mayor told BuzzFeed News.

In particular, Buttigieg believes exemptions are appropriate for people who can't be vaccinated for medical reasons. Personal belief and religious exemptions should only be allowed in states that aren't facing a public health crisis and where herd immunity rates of vaccination are maintained.

"These exemptions include medical exemptions in all cases (as in cases where it is unsafe for the individual to get vaccinated), and personal/religious exemptions if states can maintain local herd immunity and there is no public health crisis," the spokesperson said.


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/claudiakoerner/2020-presidential-candidates-vaccines-measles-health?bftwnews&utm_term=4ldqpgc#4ldqpgc

.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BuzzFeed News: Pete Buttigieg supports religious exemptions for vaccines if herd immunity exists. (Original Post) TheBlackAdder Apr 2019 OP
It's not like he's breaking precedent. Those exemptions have always ecstatic Apr 2019 #1
There is no way to guarantee herd immunity as people travel, relocate, attend college, etc. TheBlackAdder Apr 2019 #3
The Jahova Witnesses have a water tight case crazytown Apr 2019 #5
Yet their dying on the table could cause others to join them. TheBlackAdder Apr 2019 #8
Jehovah's Witnesses will not accept blood transfusions. . . Collimator Apr 2019 #13
Who told you that? Andy823 Apr 2019 #29
My memory may not be very clear. Collimator May 2019 #39
The Jehovah Witnesses DO vaccinate radical noodle Apr 2019 #30
I have been thinking this, too... susanna May 2019 #41
Unless a qualified medical doctor says the vaccine will harm you, there should be no exemptions. LonePirate Apr 2019 #2
But then like-minded doctors, or religiously motivated ones would write exemptions for others. TheBlackAdder Apr 2019 #6
A better approach might be for schools to require it with no exceptions, but a general ecstatic Apr 2019 #7
That sounds a little libertarian, since there are other mandated innoculations required for children TheBlackAdder Apr 2019 #19
I don't like it, but there is a certain logic to it. marylandblue Apr 2019 #4
That is a very stupid proposal, sorry Pete. You clearly DON'T understand public health, hlthe2b Apr 2019 #9
These exemptions have been on the books in all 50 States for decades leftofcool Apr 2019 #12
Ha.. i am so well aware of that having had to deal with them for decades. But defending them with hlthe2b Apr 2019 #15
He isn't proposing anything that is not already a law. leftofcool Apr 2019 #16
Suggesting we can monitor herd immunity for decisions on who to vaccinate or not hlthe2b Apr 2019 #18
This is already being done in some States leftofcool Apr 2019 #24
I work in the field, have been singularly responsible in prior employment. So, you are not educating hlthe2b Apr 2019 #26
Yeah, no wellst0nev0ter Apr 2019 #27
Those exemptions and rules normally worked in the past radical noodle Apr 2019 #31
religion first, public welfare second nt msongs Apr 2019 #10
Religious Objections to the Measles Vaccine? Get the Shots, Faith Leaders Say Eugene Apr 2019 #11
Pete is correct. These are the laws leftofcool Apr 2019 #14
While the current law, many states, such as NJ & NY, are reevaluating religious exemptions. TheBlackAdder Apr 2019 #17
Not good. There shoild be no exception for religious beliefs. SunSeeker Apr 2019 #20
I think this is a very sensible approach. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2019 #21
Anyone wishing a religious exemption to vaccination should have to provide LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #22
lol! nt ecstatic Apr 2019 #28
. dalton99a May 2019 #35
Extremely bad idea nt BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #23
This is terrible NYMinute Apr 2019 #25
There are perfectly valid medical reasons radical noodle Apr 2019 #32
There are none except NYMinute May 2019 #44
Yes, immunodeficiency is what I had in mind radical noodle May 2019 #45
The fact that this position aligns somewhat w/ existing laws/rules does not make it good or rational RockRaven Apr 2019 #33
From the buzzfeed article: catchnrelease May 2019 #34
That sounds nothing like his quote. RandySF May 2019 #37
The original quote came from a spokesperson, not Pete himself, marylandblue May 2019 #40
I said that I would raise money for him if ran for other office RandySF May 2019 #36
According to Buzzfeed, the campaign has added a "clarifying statement": WhiskeyGrinder May 2019 #38
not sure johannsyah May 2019 #42
Important: Mayor Pete has cleaned this up, saying MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS ONLY hlthe2b May 2019 #43
 

ecstatic

(32,701 posts)
1. It's not like he's breaking precedent. Those exemptions have always
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:43 PM
Apr 2019

been allowed.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,190 posts)
3. There is no way to guarantee herd immunity as people travel, relocate, attend college, etc.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:45 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
5. The Jahova Witnesses have a water tight case
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:47 PM
Apr 2019

or should I said a blood tight case. They’d rather die on the table than take a needle.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,190 posts)
8. Yet their dying on the table could cause others to join them.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:49 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Collimator

(1,639 posts)
13. Jehovah's Witnesses will not accept blood transfusions. . .
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:55 PM
Apr 2019

Because they believe that a person's soul is literally present in their blood. Artificial blood substitutes have been used during surgeries and they will accept that form of medical care. Needles in general are not an issue for them. To be honest, however, I do not know their stance on vaccinations.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
29. Who told you that?
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:45 PM
Apr 2019

The witnesses used to believe blood transfusions were OK, they had no problem with it. Then a new leader decided that the Bible said "NO BLOOD", because of a scripture about bleeding the animals the were killed and don't drink the "animals" blood. Later on the started changing things by saying certain fractions were OK. Over the years it was pretty much ok to take any fractions of blood, but no transfusion, which is like saying you can eat all the ingredients of a cake, separately, but you can eat the cake that is made out of all those ingredients.

I have never heard that they think the "soul" is present in their blood. As for vaccinations they have no problem with them.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Collimator

(1,639 posts)
39. My memory may not be very clear.
Wed May 1, 2019, 01:27 AM
May 2019

And I admit that I did not do a quick internet search before I wrote my post. However, when I was a teenager, I attended some JW meetings and received their Watchtower publication. I also purchased and made use of a JW Bible for many years.

What I recall reading is that blood and soul were somehow equated and there was the usual collection of Bible verses supporting that point of view. Again, this was many years ago, but I do have a recollection that the soul/blood connection is why they did not approve of blood transmissions.

I think that the reason I remember that aspect of their beliefs is because my life was saved by a total blood transfusion when I was born. Because of that, my parents threw away many of the Watchtower booklets that arrived in the mail before I even got to see them. As you can imagine, they were not pleased when I was attending meetings at the Kingdom Hall.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
30. The Jehovah Witnesses DO vaccinate
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:52 PM
Apr 2019

Christian Scientists do not normally, although I know many who did vaccinate their kids even though the church says not to do so.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

susanna

(5,231 posts)
41. I have been thinking this, too...
Wed May 1, 2019, 04:25 AM
May 2019

went back through my files for my vaccination records (we're talking 1960s - 1980s, folks) and the religious exemption is there, in stark relief. People could always refuse being vaxxed on those grounds. Nothing new.

I think Mayor Pete might not really be cognizant that the 'religious' loophole is what allowed the current destabilization of herd immunity in so many communities around the country.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

LonePirate

(13,420 posts)
2. Unless a qualified medical doctor says the vaccine will harm you, there should be no exemptions.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:44 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,190 posts)
6. But then like-minded doctors, or religiously motivated ones would write exemptions for others.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:48 PM
Apr 2019

.

People will swiftly find out which doctors are writing the exemptions and use them to bypass vaccinations.

.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

ecstatic

(32,701 posts)
7. A better approach might be for schools to require it with no exceptions, but a general
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:48 PM
Apr 2019

state mandated requirement seems a little over the top. We're not a dictatorship yet...

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,190 posts)
19. That sounds a little libertarian, since there are other mandated innoculations required for children
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:09 PM
Apr 2019

Comparing additional vaccine requirements to a Dictatorship is a little over the top.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
4. I don't like it, but there is a certain logic to it.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:46 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

hlthe2b

(102,260 posts)
9. That is a very stupid proposal, sorry Pete. You clearly DON'T understand public health,
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:50 PM
Apr 2019

and that one doesn't get to monitor "herd immunity" continuously and in real time... One monitors vaccination rates, which given population changes are never static. Even then, it is even more complicated, given no vaccine is 100% effective. With measles, ALL it takes is one infected person on a plane or crowded event.

I know he's not a "medically-trained" person, but damn. Some smart advisor needs to get to him and quickly.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
12. These exemptions have been on the books in all 50 States for decades
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:55 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

hlthe2b

(102,260 posts)
15. Ha.. i am so well aware of that having had to deal with them for decades. But defending them with
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:03 PM
Apr 2019

this ridiculous proposal--that shows a total lack of understanding of public health and vaccine-preventable disease control when we are at historically high levels of measles is so stupid--at the very time that states are cracking down on these frequently abused exemptions. Of course, most states will continue to grant some form of religious exemption, but they are now gaining ground in the absolutely bastardized practice of "philosophical" and "personal" exemptions. We hardly need such a ridiculous statement to push us back in the opposite direction.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
16. He isn't proposing anything that is not already a law.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:06 PM
Apr 2019

The law here in Kentucky is that the Amish don't have to vaccinate if they choose not to. Do you think Mayor Pete can change that? Nope, he can't.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

hlthe2b

(102,260 posts)
18. Suggesting we can monitor herd immunity for decisions on who to vaccinate or not
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:08 PM
Apr 2019

in real time and as the only determinant--with the issuance of exemptions out of convenience and enabling of their superstitions re: vaccinations is nuts.

Perhaps some good Public Health Epidemiologists and ID doctors can sit him down and educate him.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
24. This is already being done in some States
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:11 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

hlthe2b

(102,260 posts)
26. I work in the field, have been singularly responsible in prior employment. So, you are not educating
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:19 PM
Apr 2019

I did have to deal with ridiculous claims about poorly masked personal exemptions presented as religious. In some States they have to discuss their beliefs that run counter or provide religious leadership documentation of the conflict with religious beliefs and practices. That alone has dramatically decreased such attempts to assert a religious conflict that does not exist where the person might have thought it did. I saw that happen with documentation provided from Christian Scientists, LDS church in Salt Lake City and even a Mennonite offshoot--none which officially opposed vaccination.

Disallowing philosophical exemptions and restricting religious exemptions to those willing to complete the least onerous of "hoops" to document such an honestly held religious belief has been shown in at least two states that I know of to dramatically increase vaccination rates and in at least one of those states, the courts fully upheld such policies--all the way to the State Supreme Court.

Granting such an exemption cannot be an on-off process dependant on establishing a level of herd immunity, which is imprecise at best, can be overcome with a single infected individual with something like measles in a public event or at a special setting such as one with many immunosuppressed individuals.

Limiting such exemptions, keeping track of who has them (at least in school-aged children) so that they can be excluded or isolated at home in the event of ongoing transmission is what needs to happen. Not arbitrarily opening up such exemptions if some politico deems the risk is low and herd immunity is sufficiently "high"

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

wellst0nev0ter

(7,509 posts)
27. Yeah, no
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:24 PM
Apr 2019
https://www.healio.com/infectious-disease/vaccine-preventable-diseases/news/online/%7B02dd4970-1c21-47b4-a11e-27b8b56916b0%7D/vaccination-of-amish-limited-2014-ohio-measles-outbreak

Members of a mostly unvaccinated Amish community in Ohio helped limit the spread of the largest measles outbreak in the United States in more than 2 decades by eschewing tradition and getting vaccinated by the thousands, according to a new report.

The Amish population at the heart of the 2014 measles outbreak that infected hundreds of people across nine Ohio counties was less opposed to vaccination than Amish communities have been in the past, researchers wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
31. Those exemptions and rules normally worked in the past
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:54 PM
Apr 2019

It's this vaccination phobia stirred by the anti-vaxxers that caused the problems.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

msongs

(67,405 posts)
10. religion first, public welfare second nt
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:51 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Eugene

(61,890 posts)
11. Religious Objections to the Measles Vaccine? Get the Shots, Faith Leaders Say
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:52 PM
Apr 2019

Source: New York Times

Religious Objections to the Measles Vaccine? Get the Shots, Faith Leaders Say

Devout parents who are worried about vaccines often object to ingredients from pigs or fetuses. But the leaders of major faiths have examined these fears and still vigorously endorse vaccination.

By Donald G. McNeil Jr.
April 26, 2019

-snip-

Vaccines, the activists say, contain ingredients made from pigs, dogs, monkeys and aborted fetuses. Indeed, most of those assertions are based in fact. Ingredient lists published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Institute for Vaccine Safety at Johns Hopkins show that vaccines may contain these elements (although any residual DNA is present only at the parts-per-million level).

Nonetheless, vaccination is endorsed by top Jewish and Islamic scholars, and by the Vatican. Religious authorities have meticulously studied how vaccines are made and what is in them, and still have ruled that they do not violate Jewish, Islamic or Catholic law.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/26/health/measles-vaccination-jews-muslims-catholics.html
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
14. Pete is correct. These are the laws
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 10:56 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

TheBlackAdder

(28,190 posts)
17. While the current law, many states, such as NJ & NY, are reevaluating religious exemptions.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:07 PM
Apr 2019

.

Retaining religious exemptions is a more conservative approach, which is challenged by recent revelations.

.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
20. Not good. There shoild be no exception for religious beliefs.
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:09 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,614 posts)
21. I think this is a very sensible approach. n/t
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:09 PM
Apr 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

LongtimeAZDem

(4,494 posts)
22. Anyone wishing a religious exemption to vaccination should have to provide
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:10 PM
Apr 2019

scientific proof of the existence of their deity.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

NYMinute

(3,256 posts)
25. This is terrible
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:19 PM
Apr 2019

It puts people's lives at risk.

The ONLY exemption should be severe allergy to the vaccine or its ingredients.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
32. There are perfectly valid medical reasons
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:57 PM
Apr 2019

for not getting the vaccines that aren't allergies.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

NYMinute

(3,256 posts)
44. There are none except
Wed May 1, 2019, 08:57 AM
May 2019

allergies and severe immunodeficiency. Maybe you can add someone who has already had measles. NONE OTHER.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
45. Yes, immunodeficiency is what I had in mind
Wed May 1, 2019, 09:23 AM
May 2019

or children being treated for things like cancer who may just have temporary difficulties with their immune systems.

BTW, I DID have my daughter vaccinated with the available vaccines of the time, as I was when I was a kid. I'm old enough to have seen the first polio vaccines and have actually had measles, rubella, mumps and chickenpox before those vaccines were available and know they're nothing to fool around with.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

RockRaven

(14,966 posts)
33. The fact that this position aligns somewhat w/ existing laws/rules does not make it good or rational
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 11:58 PM
Apr 2019

Jesus Christ, appeal to authority much?

Religious beliefs have no place in a determination of public policy *being made on the basis of evidence*.

Do we want evidence-based public policies when it comes to vaccines or not? Answer that question first.

Then keep your answer in mind and ask yourself if you welcome ANY (and truly AAAA-NNNN-YYYY, for these people will push all the envelopes you can imagine) random *allegedly*-religious excuse to ignore that policy. If so, get ready for your life to represent a bad time playing The Oregon Trail.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

catchnrelease

(1,945 posts)
34. From the buzzfeed article:
Wed May 1, 2019, 12:59 AM
May 2019

After this article was published, the campaign added in a "clarifying statement" early Wednesday that Buttigieg only supported medical exemptions to vaccinations.

"Pete believes vaccines are safe and effective and are necessary to maintaining public health," a spokesman said. "There is no evidence that vaccines are unsafe, and he believes children should be immunized to protect their health. He is aware that in most states the law provides for some kinds of exemptions. He believes only medical exemptions should be allowed."
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

RandySF

(58,803 posts)
37. That sounds nothing like his quote.
Wed May 1, 2019, 01:24 AM
May 2019

If he was correctly quoted.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
40. The original quote came from a spokesperson, not Pete himself,
Wed May 1, 2019, 03:07 AM
May 2019

so maybe the spokesperson was wrong or confused.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

RandySF

(58,803 posts)
36. I said that I would raise money for him if ran for other office
Wed May 1, 2019, 01:23 AM
May 2019

but this gives me pause.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,336 posts)
38. According to Buzzfeed, the campaign has added a "clarifying statement":
Wed May 1, 2019, 01:25 AM
May 2019
"He is aware that in most states the law provides for some kinds of exemptions. He believes only medical exemptions should be allowed."
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

johannsyah

(58 posts)
42. not sure
Wed May 1, 2019, 06:16 AM
May 2019

but I think Pete needs to hire a better spokesperson

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

hlthe2b

(102,260 posts)
43. Important: Mayor Pete has cleaned this up, saying MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS ONLY
Wed May 1, 2019, 07:17 AM
May 2019



Good on ya, Mayor

Well, that didn't take long. @PeteButtigieg issued a "clarifying statement" saying medical exemptions only.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»BuzzFeed News: Pete Butti...