Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Uncle Joe

(58,362 posts)
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 11:55 AM Jul 2019

Washington Post Fact-Checker Gets Dragged for Attacking Bernie Sanders Over Extremely True Fact



Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler was roundly criticized for attacking Independent Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders over a statement that was 100 percent true, but according to Kessler was “not especially meaningful” because of how very true it was.

At last Thursday’s Democratic Presidential Debate Part Two: Electoral Boogaloo, Sanders told moderators, “We have a new vision for America. And at a time when we have three people in this country owning more wealth than the bottom half of America, while 500,000 people are sleeping out on the streets today, we think it is time for change, real change.”

Kessler included that statement in his post-debate fact-check, and found that while the statement was “based on numbers that add up,” the comparison was “not especially meaningful” because “people in the bottom half have essentially no wealth, as debts cancel out whatever assets they might have.”

Some people disagreed with that assessment and seemed to think the fact that the bottom half of Americans have “essentially no wealth” made Sanders’ statement more meaningful, not less. Those people included senior Bernie Sanders campaign adviser David Sirota, who filed Kessler’s assertion under “THINGS YOU CAN’T MAKE UP”:

(snip)


https://www.mediaite.com/news/washington-post-fact-checker-gets-dragged-for-attacking-bernie-sanders-over-extremely-true-fact/




There are some nice tweet responses on the link.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington Post Fact-Checker Gets Dragged for Attacking Bernie Sanders Over Extremely True Fact (Original Post) Uncle Joe Jul 2019 OP
I bet it is "especially meaningful" to the people in that cohort. aidbo Jul 2019 #1
Apparently those Americans don't count according to Kessler Uncle Joe Jul 2019 #2
Indeed - That's The Bottom Line - The Status Quo Works Just Fine For Them corbettkroehler Jul 2019 #3
 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
1. I bet it is "especially meaningful" to the people in that cohort.
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 12:22 PM
Jul 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Uncle Joe

(58,362 posts)
2. Apparently those Americans don't count according to Kessler
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 12:57 PM
Jul 2019

because they don't have wealth and thus while true it's “not especially meaningful.”

This is no surprise to me as it's coming from a Bezos paper underling.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

corbettkroehler

(1,898 posts)
3. Indeed - That's The Bottom Line - The Status Quo Works Just Fine For Them
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 12:59 PM
Jul 2019

but no millions of Americans who are uninsured or underinsured (such as this author).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Washington Post Fact-Chec...