Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:14 AM Feb 2020

Facebook's Election Rules Are No Match for Bloomberg's Billions

Over the past four years, Facebook has made a big show of demonstrating how much it cares about democracy and how much it’s doing to combat election interference or fake news. It has assembled “war rooms” and published white papers. It has hired thousands of content moderators (as in, they’re looking at content; they’re actually miserable). And the company is constantly reminding people that it’s spending more on security now than the total of its revenue at the beginning of the decade. Big numbers! Facebook cares!

snip...

Over the past couple of weeks, candidate Mike Bloomberg has rolled out an aggressive program of buying endorsements on social media. He isn’t just asking celebrities and other mayors (of smaller cities) for their backing or posting weird tweets: Last week, a number of popular Instagram accounts with tens of millions of followers rolled out jokey sponcon for the former New York City mayor. Today, The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Bloomberg’s campaign will go one step further by paying regular social-media users to post about the candidate on the platforms.

snip...

That’s more than $1.25 million Bloomberg is spending just to kinda shotgun his name all over social media and into group chats. This comes in addition to a reported program for “microinfluencers,” i.e., people with small follower counts, whom Bloomberg would pay $150 in exchange for their support. That’s a lot for any campaign, but it’s nothing for the former mayor, who seems more than willing to throw money at the wall and see what sticks.

snip...

Bloomberg has managed to exploit loopholes and vagueness in various Facebook policies. That Facebook’s rules for political ads and fact-checking are clearly toothless and that Facebook doesn’t recognize how Bloomberg’s strategy may run afoul of its current rules on coordinated inauthentic behavior make it clear that Facebook’s policies are not robust. Or maybe Facebook is just willing to bend the rules for certain clients — like, I dunno, a billionaire named Mike who’s spending exponentially more on Facebook ads than any other Democratic candidate is.


https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/02/facebooks-election-rules-are-no-match-for-bloombergs-money.html

Will Faceboook enforce their established rules to reign in or regulate campaign activity on their platforms? Probably not when looking at the sheer amount of money involved.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Facebook's Election Rules Are No Match for Bloomberg's Billions (Original Post) Devil Child Feb 2020 OP
WTF? MisterFred Feb 2020 #1
The OP-ED is highly critical of Facebook not actually giving a shit about democracy Devil Child Feb 2020 #2
your OP wasn't MisterFred Feb 2020 #4
Hmmm, we're gonna have to agree to disagree as I have no love for Facebook and the OP is clear Devil Child Feb 2020 #5
Facebook doesn't police anything Jersey Devil Feb 2020 #3
No they don't, and they sure as hell won't when looking at the sheer volume of ad buys involved Devil Child Feb 2020 #6
 

MisterFred

(525 posts)
1. WTF?
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:29 AM
Feb 2020

Facebook's rules are designed to make it easy to lie. Don't spread some Zuckerberg propaganda about Facebook actually giving a shit about democracy. It doesn't give a shit.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
2. The OP-ED is highly critical of Facebook not actually giving a shit about democracy
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:40 AM
Feb 2020

Including how it does nothing but talk and has no action, especially when enriching itself off the massive ad-buys of certain campaigns. I suggest you read it as it is far from "Zuckerberg propaganda."

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

MisterFred

(525 posts)
4. your OP wasn't
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:51 AM
Feb 2020

Please don't write a misleading OP next time.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
5. Hmmm, we're gonna have to agree to disagree as I have no love for Facebook and the OP is clear
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:56 AM
Feb 2020

Headline is presented exactly as it was published. Methinks there maybe something else going on with how you perceived it but alas can't make everyone happy round here. Happy Weeekend to you MisterFred!



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
3. Facebook doesn't police anything
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:42 AM
Feb 2020

A bunch of servers in someone's garage can (and does) post all kinds of baloney with no problems. You don't need millions to do it

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
6. No they don't, and they sure as hell won't when looking at the sheer volume of ad buys involved
Sat Feb 22, 2020, 11:58 AM
Feb 2020

The influx of money will ensure minimal enforcement or already minimally enforced policy.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Facebook's Election Rules...