How can we decide without the 4 B's?

[Funtatlaguy]

Four big names still deciding.
Biden
Beto
Bloomberg
Brown

I need to hear from all of them plus Eric Swalwell before I even think about picking someone.

[Dennis Donovan]

1. Agreed. The label above the post solves nothing...

[NurseJackie]

2. It provides context and a barometer...

... and I was particularly intrigued about the possibility that candidate preference choices could be used to mathematically FORCE jury selections to be more diverse (rather than risking having a jury that was subconsciously biased in their assessment of the legitimacy of the alert).

That's definitely an improvement compared to the previous way.

[Dennis Donovan]

3. I guess it does in a way, but will it stop the Hillary Bots?

I kid, I kid!

[Mosby]

4. they are all listed but bloomberg

Maybe I don't understand the question though.

Brown has been on trms a couple time in the past week.

[WeekiWater]

5. Brown is the only one out of those who might impact my top choices. NT

[Autumn]

6. Inslee needs to step in too.

[Auggie]

7. Why do you think there's an "undecided" option?

Gosh darnit folks, it's still way, way early!

[PTWB]

8. I'm technically undecided but I lean Harris

And the way they phrased the question - who would I vote for today - made it an easy answer. Harris! But that could change because yes it is so early.

[Auggie]

11. I like Harris as well

Too early for me to commit though

[peggysue2]

9. It is wa-a-ay early but . . .

it's happening anyway. Which is why I'm an undecided at this point (though I lean Biden/Harris).

I really think we need to see these candidates out on the trail, answering questions, debating policy points. My main (perhaps only) criterion is that whoever the candidate is, he/she can mow the Trumpster down. And if the Trumpster isn't on the ticket, mow any and all Republicans down.

That being said? It's going to be a long (and insufferable) primary season.

[Auggie]

10. +1