Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1223 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Protesters take the stage at Klobuchar rally (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Mar 2020
OP
Her involvement in the Myon Burrell case has been twisted beyond recognition.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2020
#1
This a psyop against Amy K similar to what happened to HRC in 2016 with a group of BLM folks.
underthematrix
Mar 2020
#4
They had to cancel the rally because the protesters refused to leave the stage.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2020
#5
They should have been dragged out and arrested...I have no patience for such things...
Demsrule86
Mar 2020
#6
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,947 posts)1. Her involvement in the Myon Burrell case has been twisted beyond recognition.
The Hennepin County Attorneys' Office recently issued this statement, which I am posting here in its entirety instead of just linking to it, in the hope that people will actually read it:
The murder of 11-year-old Tyesha Edwards by Myon Burrell
This statement is being issued to update the public on the status of this offices consideration of the case of Myon Burrell.
The context is important. This case is being politicized because it first arose when Amy Klobuchar was the Hennepin County Attorney. The case, however, involves the murder of an 11-year old girl, and the person who has been convicted twice of committing that murder. Amy Klobuchar was not the trial attorney on the case. It should not be treated like a political football. This office will continue to focus on the facts and will not let the politics of the moment influence that review of the facts.
It also should be noted that the second trial - the conviction for which Mr. Burrell is now in prison - was obtained by this office after Amy Klobuchar had left this office and with no input from her. So, any complaints should be directed to this office, have nothing to do with Sen. Klobuchar, and it is inappropriate and unfair to try to make them an issue in the current presidential race.
We focus on facts. Burrell is represented by legal counsel and the Innocence Project is actively working on his case. Last Friday they called, and we will be meeting with them soon. We will promptly review any new issues. However, we feel it important to release this preliminary statement as we have been reviewing this case for weeks and there is much misinformation out there.
At this time, accordingly, we are commenting on the information that has been recited in various press reports. Here is a re-cap of the factual history and the major points that have been raised recently:
Basic Facts and Trial Histories
In mid-afternoon November 2002, 11-year-old Tyesha Edwards was sitting at a table in her house doing her homework when a bullet, fired from across the street, pierced the houses siding and struck Tyesha. She died later that day. Myon Burrells target was a rival gang member, Timothy Oliver, who was standing outside of a neighboring house. In the first trial, a Hennepin County District Court jury of 12 citizens unanimously convicted 17-year-old Myon Burrell of murdering Tyesha. Mr. Burrell appealed and in 2005, the Minnesota Supreme Court ordered a new trial based on a Miranda warning error.
In the second trial in late 2007, Mr. Burrell asked for a trial by a judge and not a jury. He was found guilty again. In 2011, Mr. Burrell challenged his conviction again and it was upheld by the district court and the Minnesota Supreme Court. Subsequent appeals were denied by the courts.
Despite the intense scrutiny given this case by the courts, questions have now been raised 18 years later. The answers follow.
Why is Myon Burrell still in prison when he says he did not kill Tyesha Edwards?
A: Myon Burrell has said a lot of things. He initially told police he was in Bemidji with his mother at the time of the shooting. Then, during his trial, the second alibi was, he was at a friends house playing video games. Now, a news report claims Mr. Burrell has a third alibi, that two people are claiming they were with him at a nearby grocery store at the time of the shooting. These two people never came forward and no plausible explanation has been offered why these two people waited 18 years to say anything. Mr. Burrell remains in prison because a jury, then a judge, found him guilty of murdering Tyesha Edwards and the Minnesota Supreme Court agreed.
Even without an alibi, isnt the evidence against Myon Burrell weak?
A: No. The evidence is quite strong which is why he was convicted twice. Timothy Oliver was the intended victim of the gun fire and he saw Burrell across the street shooting at him and identified Burrell by his nickname and in a photo lineup. In pleading guilty, one of Mr. Burrells gang accomplices testified that Myon Burrell fired the shots. Mr. Burrell also confessed to a cousin that he was involved in the murder of Tyesha Edwards. Burrell also confessed to a jail inmate who knew details of the murder that had never been made public. The judge found the testimony of Oliver, Burrells cousin, and the jail inmate credible.
But the gang case did not have basic evidence like the murder weapon, fingerprints or DNA, did it?
A; Many convictions do not have those elements. Mr. Burrell and his two gang friends drove past Mr. Oliver, who was working on a car and they recognized him as belonging to a rival gang. They returned a short time later and Myon Burrell positioned himself across the street, fired numerous shots, then jumped back into the car and drove off. The gun was never found because Mr. Burrells accomplices admitted they got rid of it so there were no surfaces to check for fingerprints or DNA. This is not unusual and no indication of innocence.
Isnt it true that Mr. Olivers testimony was inconsistent, and Mr. Burrells companions recanted?
A: The judge in the second trial called Mr. Olivers testimony consistent and credible. As for Myon Burrells accomplices, they also said a lot of things. Initially, their statements put Mr. Burrell in the car with them and one said Burrell was the shooter. Both accomplices recanted their original statements at Burrells second trial and the judge found them "not credible" because their stories were inconsistent and contradicted by other evidence.
Wasnt a police investigator telling people he had hundreds of dollars if they could provide information on Tyesha Edwards murder?
A: It is common practice in cases that are not solved with an immediate arrest for a reward to be offered for any information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person responsible. In Minnesota, those rewards are often offered through the Crime stoppers organization. Witnesses in gang cases are often extremely reluctant to speak with police so it would not be unusual for a police detective to offer a person a reward for cooperating. In Burrells case, the person paid by police did not testify at either trial.
What does Tyesha Edwards family have to say about this case?
A: Tyeshas father, who sat through both trials, is convinced that Myon Burrell is the man who murdered his little girl. He wonders why people are so concerned about Mr. Burrell and appear not to care at all that a bright, young girl who was supposed to be safe in her house, had her life tragically cut short.
In summary, none of this evidence is new, with the exception of the two people providing a third alibi 18 years later. All of the rest of it was introduced in court, evaluated by the fact-finders (a jury in one, a judge in the other) and the result was a guilty verdict both times. And the verdicts and evidence were reviewed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
Former Hennepin County Attorney Amy Klobuchar, now a U.S. Senator and a candidate for president of the United States, has publicly stated that if new evidence is found, it should be reviewed. As we have consistently stated in other cases throughout the years and we restate it here, we are always willing to look at new evidence. Mr. Burrell has retained a new lawyer to look into his case. We have been cooperating with Burrells attorneys in their review of the evidence. If Burrell or his lawyers provide new information, we will carefully review it.
https://www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news/2020/February/myon-burrell-statementThis statement is being issued to update the public on the status of this offices consideration of the case of Myon Burrell.
The context is important. This case is being politicized because it first arose when Amy Klobuchar was the Hennepin County Attorney. The case, however, involves the murder of an 11-year old girl, and the person who has been convicted twice of committing that murder. Amy Klobuchar was not the trial attorney on the case. It should not be treated like a political football. This office will continue to focus on the facts and will not let the politics of the moment influence that review of the facts.
It also should be noted that the second trial - the conviction for which Mr. Burrell is now in prison - was obtained by this office after Amy Klobuchar had left this office and with no input from her. So, any complaints should be directed to this office, have nothing to do with Sen. Klobuchar, and it is inappropriate and unfair to try to make them an issue in the current presidential race.
We focus on facts. Burrell is represented by legal counsel and the Innocence Project is actively working on his case. Last Friday they called, and we will be meeting with them soon. We will promptly review any new issues. However, we feel it important to release this preliminary statement as we have been reviewing this case for weeks and there is much misinformation out there.
At this time, accordingly, we are commenting on the information that has been recited in various press reports. Here is a re-cap of the factual history and the major points that have been raised recently:
Basic Facts and Trial Histories
In mid-afternoon November 2002, 11-year-old Tyesha Edwards was sitting at a table in her house doing her homework when a bullet, fired from across the street, pierced the houses siding and struck Tyesha. She died later that day. Myon Burrells target was a rival gang member, Timothy Oliver, who was standing outside of a neighboring house. In the first trial, a Hennepin County District Court jury of 12 citizens unanimously convicted 17-year-old Myon Burrell of murdering Tyesha. Mr. Burrell appealed and in 2005, the Minnesota Supreme Court ordered a new trial based on a Miranda warning error.
In the second trial in late 2007, Mr. Burrell asked for a trial by a judge and not a jury. He was found guilty again. In 2011, Mr. Burrell challenged his conviction again and it was upheld by the district court and the Minnesota Supreme Court. Subsequent appeals were denied by the courts.
Despite the intense scrutiny given this case by the courts, questions have now been raised 18 years later. The answers follow.
Why is Myon Burrell still in prison when he says he did not kill Tyesha Edwards?
A: Myon Burrell has said a lot of things. He initially told police he was in Bemidji with his mother at the time of the shooting. Then, during his trial, the second alibi was, he was at a friends house playing video games. Now, a news report claims Mr. Burrell has a third alibi, that two people are claiming they were with him at a nearby grocery store at the time of the shooting. These two people never came forward and no plausible explanation has been offered why these two people waited 18 years to say anything. Mr. Burrell remains in prison because a jury, then a judge, found him guilty of murdering Tyesha Edwards and the Minnesota Supreme Court agreed.
Even without an alibi, isnt the evidence against Myon Burrell weak?
A: No. The evidence is quite strong which is why he was convicted twice. Timothy Oliver was the intended victim of the gun fire and he saw Burrell across the street shooting at him and identified Burrell by his nickname and in a photo lineup. In pleading guilty, one of Mr. Burrells gang accomplices testified that Myon Burrell fired the shots. Mr. Burrell also confessed to a cousin that he was involved in the murder of Tyesha Edwards. Burrell also confessed to a jail inmate who knew details of the murder that had never been made public. The judge found the testimony of Oliver, Burrells cousin, and the jail inmate credible.
But the gang case did not have basic evidence like the murder weapon, fingerprints or DNA, did it?
A; Many convictions do not have those elements. Mr. Burrell and his two gang friends drove past Mr. Oliver, who was working on a car and they recognized him as belonging to a rival gang. They returned a short time later and Myon Burrell positioned himself across the street, fired numerous shots, then jumped back into the car and drove off. The gun was never found because Mr. Burrells accomplices admitted they got rid of it so there were no surfaces to check for fingerprints or DNA. This is not unusual and no indication of innocence.
Isnt it true that Mr. Olivers testimony was inconsistent, and Mr. Burrells companions recanted?
A: The judge in the second trial called Mr. Olivers testimony consistent and credible. As for Myon Burrells accomplices, they also said a lot of things. Initially, their statements put Mr. Burrell in the car with them and one said Burrell was the shooter. Both accomplices recanted their original statements at Burrells second trial and the judge found them "not credible" because their stories were inconsistent and contradicted by other evidence.
Wasnt a police investigator telling people he had hundreds of dollars if they could provide information on Tyesha Edwards murder?
A: It is common practice in cases that are not solved with an immediate arrest for a reward to be offered for any information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person responsible. In Minnesota, those rewards are often offered through the Crime stoppers organization. Witnesses in gang cases are often extremely reluctant to speak with police so it would not be unusual for a police detective to offer a person a reward for cooperating. In Burrells case, the person paid by police did not testify at either trial.
What does Tyesha Edwards family have to say about this case?
A: Tyeshas father, who sat through both trials, is convinced that Myon Burrell is the man who murdered his little girl. He wonders why people are so concerned about Mr. Burrell and appear not to care at all that a bright, young girl who was supposed to be safe in her house, had her life tragically cut short.
In summary, none of this evidence is new, with the exception of the two people providing a third alibi 18 years later. All of the rest of it was introduced in court, evaluated by the fact-finders (a jury in one, a judge in the other) and the result was a guilty verdict both times. And the verdicts and evidence were reviewed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
Former Hennepin County Attorney Amy Klobuchar, now a U.S. Senator and a candidate for president of the United States, has publicly stated that if new evidence is found, it should be reviewed. As we have consistently stated in other cases throughout the years and we restate it here, we are always willing to look at new evidence. Mr. Burrell has retained a new lawyer to look into his case. We have been cooperating with Burrells attorneys in their review of the evidence. If Burrell or his lawyers provide new information, we will carefully review it.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)3. Thank you - I hadn't heard of the whole thing until tonight
...when I saw the tweets about the protest. Thanks for the addl info!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,487 posts)2. How she handles the next hour will determine...a lot.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)4. This a psyop against Amy K similar to what happened to HRC in 2016 with a group of BLM folks.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,947 posts)5. They had to cancel the rally because the protesters refused to leave the stage.
Amy said she'd meet with them, and the protesters initially agreed to leave if she met with them, but then they backed out and refused to go. So the rally had to be canceled. https://www.mprnews.org/story/2020/03/01/protesters-take-stage-at-site-of-klobuchar-campaign-rally
It's a ridiculous thing to protest because she wasn't even the county attorney at the time of Burrell's second trial, in which he was convicted again.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,768 posts)6. They should have been dragged out and arrested...I have no patience for such things...
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden