Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MannyGoldstein

MannyGoldstein's Journal
MannyGoldstein's Journal
August 20, 2013

"Spy On Everyone" won't change while Obama is President

Based on what I've observed, our President seems to categorize people into two groups:

1. Peers to be treated with great respect, such as bankers and other people of great wealth, and other US politicians save for non-authoritarian Democrats. These are people he can work with to solve problems, there is give and take.

2. The governed, whose opinions are of no consequence. This group includes the press, leaders of countries in the Southern Hemisphere, and the rest of us. Like sometimes-unruly children, we must be taught that he is the daddy, and he will have his way.

Witness Obama's struggle to cut Social Security, which he began a month before taking office, and continues to this day. No matter how hated this effort is by the 99%, no matter how obvious it's become that his proposals will cause some of our aged to go hungry, he continues to cook Social Security's books to claim that it needs "reforms".

Witness the freezing out, even the arrest, of those who wanted a workable solution for health insurance reform.

Witness the war of intimidation against the press.

Witness the widely-hated Trans-Pacific Partnership, a treaty so wretched and destructive that Elizabeth Warren tells us it has to be kept secret or else people would demand that negotiations cease.

Now witness Obama's pledge to "reform" Spy On Everyone, the program he's steadfastly defended. It is a program run for group 1, against group 2. The "reform", by his own admission, will only be around the program's PR, and Clapper will be in charge of it. Is this any different than putting Simpson and Bowles in charge of proposing "reforms" for Social Security? The outcome is decided, and it's not one that most Americans want.

In fact, I can't think of a single issue involving us little people that Obama's ever changed his mind on, ever stopped fighting to get his way on. If I'm wrong here, please let me know.

So I suppose that we can hoot and holler, but unless we pry the Presidents hands off of his security apparatus' levers with a crowbar, ain't nothing changing until 1/20/2017. And if, God help us, a Republican takes the oath of office that day, he or she will have some pretty awful precedents involving suppression of civil liberties and the press that will allow for some incredible mischief.

August 19, 2013

I was skeptical that Obama would succeed, but I was wrong.

Candidate Obama presented himself as a transformative-President-to-be who would unite the Left and the Right.

He did it.

We now have the Left and the Right united in our anger at the pervasive spying apparatus being operated by the White House, with a side order of lying like crazy and mooning international law to force down an elected leader's plane, intimidate reporters, and so forth. A broad bipartisan coalition, both in Washington and across America, want this @#$% to end.

What's weird is that at this moment of triumph, it's Obama's most fervent supporters who are trying to keep Left and Right far apart. Oh well.

No, it's not time to shack up with the crazy Right. Because they're crazy. And little good comes from partnering with people who can't grasp history, math or science. But at least we have a little bit of common ground we can agree on, a little sliver of hope. Who knows, perhaps in time we can build on it a little and get some things done. Or not.

August 18, 2013

Why is the White House shilling for Rand Paul?

By their full-throated endorsement of Spy On Everyone, the White House is showcasing one of the only issues where most Americans agree with Paul: that our government should follow the Fourth Amendment.

They'll turn Paul into a folk hero!

Why is the White House doing this? Who's behind it?

Fuck Rand Paul!

August 17, 2013

Seems like it's checkmate. We lost.

Looks like only a few of us *real* Democrats left who haven't become Rand Paul acolytes. Just 9 months ago we won big in the national elections. Today, there's only a few of us left who believe in the need to spy on everyone and lie like crazy about it. And some even speak of not starting wars. What, I ask, could be more Paulistic then not starting wars?

We've fallen so far, so fast.

Well, I for one will never, ever become a Paulite! Any other true Democrats out there who are with me?

Regards,

Third-Way Manny

August 16, 2013

It's time for the Left to stop the gotcha politics

More drivel today about how politicians shouldn't make stuff up.

Remember when Obama said the NSA wasn’t “actually abusing” its powers? He was wrong. Gotcha!

Huge Majority Wants Clapper Prosecuted For Perjury - Salon Gotcha!

Note that there's nothing in the Constitution that says our politicians shouldn't lie, because our Founding Fathers wanted politicians to lie like crazy.

The Republicans lie too, so we have to do it too to stay competitive. I mean, do you think any Democrat could get elected if they were truthful about amping up free trade agreements, giving the 99%'s cash to Wall Street, and spying on every American? No, Americans would not vote for a candidate who said they'd do those things. So we have to lie. No choice.

So grow up, Liberals. Politics is a game for adults like me.

Regards,

Third-Way Manny

August 15, 2013

Next Fed Head Should Meet the Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren Standard

What, "Crash" Summers ain't good enough?

Next Fed Head Should Meet the Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren Standard

No presidential appointment, no Senate confirmation, matters more than the one that will soon come for the post of chairman of the Federal Reserve...

Yet, for the most part, official Washington is on autopilot, preparing for the replacement of outgoing Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke with another predictable insider—perhaps even the ultimate predictable insider: former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.

...

But, no matter who the nominee is, Sanders and Warren argue this week in a Huffington Post column that “the next Fed chair will have an opportunity to get our economy back on track and to help rebuild America’s middle class. But that will require the right temperament and a willingness to take on Wall Street CEOs when necessary. It is critical that the next Fed chair make a genuine, long-term commitment to supporting those who don’t have armies of lobbyists and lawyers to advance their interests in Washington—working and middle-class families.”

To that end, the senators have developed a set of questions that need to be answered by whomever is chosen to replace Bernanke...
August 14, 2013

US Olympic team should wear rainbow uniforms in Sochi

Shame the @#$&ers.

August 14, 2013

Sen. Warren Wants to Know Why Gay Men Can't Donate Blood

Sen. Warren Wants to Know Why Gay Men Can't Donate Blood

After receiving a letter from a Roslindale resident who was not allowed to give blood after the Boston Marathon bombings because of his sexual orientation, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has asked for a review of the federal policy.

Warren sent a bipartisan, bicameral letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius recently voicing concern "over the agency's sluggish pace at reevaluating blood donation policies for men who have sex with men (MSM)." The letter requested information about HHS's ongoing efforts to gather data and review this policy.

Senators Mike Enzi (R-WY) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Representatives Mike Quigley (D-IL) and Barbara Lee (D-CA) also led the letter and 81 of their congressional colleagues, including Senator Edward Markey and Representatives Jim McGovern, John Tierney and Niki Tsongas of Massachusetts signed with their support. The full text of the letter is available here.

...

"For me, this has been a basic issue of fairness and of science - blood donation policies should be grounded in science, not ugly and inaccurate stereotypes," said Warren. "When a Massachusetts man told me he wanted to donate blood during the bombings but couldn't because of his sexual orientation, I dug deeper into this discriminatory ban and I didn't like what I found. Current policies are contrary to science. They promote discrimination and don't make the system any safer. It's long past time for HHS to make blood donation policies fairer and more effective."

Profile Information

Name: Manny Goldstein
Gender: Male
Hometown: Greater Boston
Home country: USA
Current location: Remulak, as far as I can tell
Member since: Tue Aug 30, 2005, 09:44 AM
Number of posts: 34,589
Latest Discussions»MannyGoldstein's Journal