So, it looks like I've found a place to live....

I haven't been really open about my personal situation around here. It's kind of not natural to me. But I've been staying with family for a couple of years now, trying to find steady work and get on my own two feet.....trying to find my bootstraps, as it were.

First up was a decent job. I posted a month or so ago that I have done that. I've been working through agencies for the past couple of years, but hadn't found a place to actually pick up my contract until the end of this last August. So, step 1 accomplished. I'm still technically on probation, but I've left the agency and am collecting paychecks from a real company now. They seem happy with my work so far. I've worked there since April, so they've had time to evaluate me.

Next step, hunting for a living situation I can afford that lightens my commute. Where I've been staying is a great house, and my sis has been beyond generous, but it's time. She wants to sell the place as a major part of her plans for retirement.

Well, I talked to a lady today who's renting out part of her double wide mobile and it looks like it should go through. I haven't actually seen it yet, but we had a good talk over coffee (well, Starbucks if you call that coffee ). Her old roommate had just moved out and she wanted a chance to get things in order before she shows it. She did say she liked my looks and would not futher advertise until at least next week, after I get a look and we can finalize the deal. It's on just a handshake now, but sounds really promising.

It prices out in my wheelhouse and is a much shorter commute (a couple of miles from work vs the current 20).

So, once again, wish me luck.

I have come to believe that there is something else at play....

Much of it is race-based, of course, because the country as a whole has not fixed that problem yet.

But the hatred of the act comes from the top, who are 'above' such things, I think. The real power brokers behind this reflect, IMHO, a rebirth of the states rights movement.

This doesn't seem to go away. It led to the Constitution, as the new Americans after the Revolution came to realize that the Articles of Confederation just weren't working. After the Constitution was ratified, there was still a lot of dissatisfaction and hatred of the central authority in Washington. Eventually, that led to the Civil War. Once again, we can see its ugly head rearing up.

Consider the rising of secessionist movements in Alaska (remember Caribou Barbie's husband?) and Texas. There are people who take such ideas seriously, and want to emphasize that the United States is not a nation made of provinces, like France, but is a Federated Republic made up of independent states. Corporate power always has a certain dichotomy to work with. Having uniform laws across the country is easier from an administrative sense, fewer differing regulatory regimes to deal with. However, the fragmentation also helps, because the individual states are weaker and easier to exploit than a big national government.

Just something I've been musing on lately.

I've long suspected that much of what' going on....

has deep roots in the whole "state's rights" movement that led to the Civil War in 1860. And as usual, that meme is generally used to 'protect' actions that reasonable people tend to consider abominable. Then, it was slavery. Now, there's still a racist tint to it, and there is definitely a class thing going on, where some Southerners seem to be nostalgic for that antebellum time when there was a society patterened after the English countryside, with 'nobility' and peasants.

There's a libertarian streak in there of people who just don't give a shit about others, and really don't think anybody else does either. I actually had one post on a message board to me this morning, "You're pretending you care in any meaningful way about this fact?" as if because he was a prick, well, everybody else must be, too.

The FGN's are similar, thinking that they need a gun with them always to protect themselves from everybody else, like we're living in Dodge City from the 1870's or something. They won't be happy until the US is some re-enactment of Deadwood or something.

Rant continues another day.....

"He who has the power to destroy a thing, controls it."

Frank Herbert in Dune.

Deficit reduction......fine-raise taxes on fucking millionaires...

There's a new thought process that's been taking over for the last 20-30 years...

Under this meme, there is a definite level of "healthy turnover" that they like to have to keep the workforce in companies "fresh." They basically don't want people to stay in their company more than about 5 years or so, and anybody who has been in a certain job, or at one company for longer periods than that are not trusted and not wanted.

It almost makes sense, except that for people like us, post 50ish, it plays into the whole 'overqualified' realm of ageism.

Back when we entered the workforce, people who stayed at their jobs for life (or long periods, anyway) were admired for their loyalty, dedication, and perseverance. Now they're distrusted as not ambitious enough, not creative or outward thinking, not entrepreneurial or other such bullshit new-age buzzwords du jour.

It is part and parcel of the continuing effort to drive down wages and make the employee class desperate and needy.