Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Nanjeanne
Nanjeanne's Journal
Nanjeanne's Journal
April 26, 2019
Civil rights attorney, Pamela Price, endorses Bernie in CA
https://twitter.com/ppricecares/status/1120399204646621186?s=21
April 17, 2019
Warren at the top with 5.5%
Next Inslee with 4.1
Then that cheapskate Bernie with only 3.4
Klobuchar gave 1.9
Gillibrand came in at 1.7
Harris at 1.4
Beto gave a whopping 0.3
You can read it also in Washington Post but its behind a firewall
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2019/04/16/daily-202-tax-returns-show-2020-candidates-gave-to-charity-but-not-a-ton/5cb4ab60a7a0a475985bd448/?utm_term=.cf7f9b48b14c
By contrast, Biden has given very little to charity but has increased his contributions once he became VP.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=5791846&page=1
Personally I dont really care about candidates charitable contributions as much as their policies to help Americans live a good life. But since some people were very focused on what Sanders didnt give, a little perspective, I thought, was worthwhile.
Sanders, according to some, is cheap with his charitable contributions. How about others?
https://slate.com/business/2019/04/beto-orourke-democratic-candidates-tax-returns-charitable-giving.htmlWarren at the top with 5.5%
Next Inslee with 4.1
Then that cheapskate Bernie with only 3.4
Klobuchar gave 1.9
Gillibrand came in at 1.7
Harris at 1.4
Beto gave a whopping 0.3
You can read it also in Washington Post but its behind a firewall
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2019/04/16/daily-202-tax-returns-show-2020-candidates-gave-to-charity-but-not-a-ton/5cb4ab60a7a0a475985bd448/?utm_term=.cf7f9b48b14c
By contrast, Biden has given very little to charity but has increased his contributions once he became VP.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=5791846&page=1
Personally I dont really care about candidates charitable contributions as much as their policies to help Americans live a good life. But since some people were very focused on what Sanders didnt give, a little perspective, I thought, was worthwhile.
April 11, 2019
snip
snip
Worth reading the whole article by Gerald Friedman, economics professor at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Take it from an economist, Medicare for All is the most sensible way to fix health care
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/04/08/medicare-for-all-reasonable-practical-health-care-reform-column/3393034002/We all recognize that the status quo isnt working. We spend more per person than any other country on health care, but we arent getting any bang for our buck. We have lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality rates and more preventable deaths, and too many personal bankruptcies are due at least in part to medical bills.
Where we disagree is the solution. The favorite new reasonable plan is Medicare for America, a bill from Reps. Jan Schakowsky and Rosa DeLauro that has won the support of big names like Texas presidential hopeful Beto ORourke and the Center for American Progress, the left-of-center think tank where the plan originated as Medicare Extra for All. It has been extolled in opinion pieces for some of Americas largest newspapers as a realistic plan to fix whats broken in our health care system.
Where we disagree is the solution. The favorite new reasonable plan is Medicare for America, a bill from Reps. Jan Schakowsky and Rosa DeLauro that has won the support of big names like Texas presidential hopeful Beto ORourke and the Center for American Progress, the left-of-center think tank where the plan originated as Medicare Extra for All. It has been extolled in opinion pieces for some of Americas largest newspapers as a realistic plan to fix whats broken in our health care system.
snip
Time to get real. As an economist who has spent decades studying our health care system, I can tell you that Medicare for All advocates are the only ones who are being reasonable, because theirs is the only plan that will control health care costs while finally achieving universal coverage.
Insurance companies are middle men
The problem with incremental plans, whether they are public options, buy-ins to Medicare or Medicaid, or pumping more money into subsidies in the Affordable Care Act's individual marketplace, is that they preserve the private health insurance system weighing down our health care.
Insurance companies are middle men
The problem with incremental plans, whether they are public options, buy-ins to Medicare or Medicaid, or pumping more money into subsidies in the Affordable Care Act's individual marketplace, is that they preserve the private health insurance system weighing down our health care.
snip
If were talking about which health care reform plans are serious about attacking cost, providing universal coverage and making sure everyone has access to health care, Medicare for All is the only reasonable answer. No other plan does this effectively, which is why I suspect that the Center for American Progress has not come out with spending estimates. Basic economic tenets tell us that their plan will not reduce health care spending as effectively.
Is Medicare for All bold? Absolutely. Is it reasonable? You bet. It is time to accept that Medicare for All is the practical alternative.
Is Medicare for All bold? Absolutely. Is it reasonable? You bet. It is time to accept that Medicare for All is the practical alternative.
Worth reading the whole article by Gerald Friedman, economics professor at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Profile Information
Member since: Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:02 PMNumber of posts: 4,984