Eliot Rosewater
Eliot Rosewater's JournalWeird, people changing their candidate preference every couple days...weird
Weird.
Weird.
Personally, I had Kamala from day one, then when she dropped out I changed. I cant recall EVER in my LIFE changing my preference every couple days. Weird.
And going from one extreme to the other then back again, weird.
Sorry but I REFUSE to use PUTIN'S acronym for the KGB
Sigh
Anyway, yeah, they changed that so we would fall for it, not falling for it. KGB is still alive and well, simply called something else.
Why I have to SAY THAT HERE I dont know, wait, maybe I do.
Who is the PIECE OF SHIT who asked Nancy "Do you hate the President" ? which piece of SHIT
said that?
Can I assume it was fox or breitbart?
Real journalists wont say that.
Next time some con says they vote for the economy when they vote for repubs
show them this
https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/democrats/2016/6/the-economy-under-democratic-vs-republican-presidents
These FACTS are available from more sources than this.
Thom Hartmann speaks of this often, that the dems ALWAYS do better, period.
It is a FACT. So NO you do NOT vote on economics, Mr. Con, you vote for repubs to enhance your RACISM and bigotry and for no other fucking reason.
Shame on COSTCO.com for not anticipating today's
traffic and allowing their site to crash.
I love Costco, most stores and corps are garbage, they are not.
But there is no excuse for this.
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO!
Can I get a ABSOLUTELY!
And no matter what you do, DONT vote for the
Hoffa gave Nixon a half a million and Nixon pardoned him..
GOP has been filthy dirty no good pieces of SHIT ever since.
So here's the thing, ANY negative comment about ANY democratic candidate, and I mean ANY
whether fair criticism or not, is HEARD by several other people some of whom may very well NOT vote if they get the impression both sides are the same.
And it is tricky, for instance I dont like what Bloomberg has said about pot or strip and frisk, and I dont want that thinking in the WH, HAVING SAID THAT if for some reason he ends up the nominee, I have to act like I never thought that and support him as if I LOVE him. Cuz anything else will have the UNINTENDED (on my part it would be, some folks have this AS their intention though) consequence of planting a negative seed in the minds of anyone who hears or reads me.
Hell, I am NOT a Joe Biden supporter for several reasons NOW in the primary, but it is DANGEROUS for me to say that very often and especially dangerous for me to explain WHY because AGAIN those comments can HURT him later if he is the nominee.
The tricky part is we need to have our arguments, our "falling in love" in the primary but then we MUST "fall in line."
Right? Anybody disagree?
If you are around ANYONE who is not a fervent D party supporter DONT make negative comments about ANY of our candidates!
Please!
If the House and Senate had overwhelming majorities of patriots, i.e. democrats in 2008
and 2010 and so on, you would have a PUBLIC OPTION already, you might even have universal healthcare by now, who knows!
You would have the rich paying their fair share of the taxes.
You might have reduced costs of higher education and you sure as FUCK would have cleaner air and water and more being done about
GLOBAL WARMING!
So instead of DEMANDING your way or the highway, INSISTING your candidate be the one, how about work to elect DEMOCRATS everywhere, not just as president and not JUST your favorite candidate because for half of you or more your favorite candidate WONT be the nominee.
I am talking to both sides now, the moderates who are fearful that M4All is dangerous to propose now and those who insist that we propose it now.
Suggestion to Warren (she is the only person with a D after their name who is doing this)
so I will only address her campaign.
Dont say "taxing the rich", it sounds too liberal far lefty, etc.
I am for it, in fact I think they should be taxed MORE than what she is proposing, but WORDS and phrases matter big time, just ask Frank Luntz of the GOP and why he told them to stop calling it Global Warming and start calling it Climate Change.
I dont know what the phrase could be, but NOT that.
"Lets Go back to the good ole days when rich people paid taxes!"
Maybe something like that?
Profile Information
Member since: Sat Dec 3, 2016, 11:41 AMNumber of posts: 31,109