Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Oprah Winfrey Helped Create Our Irrational Pseudoscientific American Fantasyland - Slate [View all]
https://slate.com/health-and-science/2018/01/oprah-winfrey-helped-create-our-irrational-pseudoscientific-american-fantasyland.htmlAny assessment of her possible presidential bid should consider the irrational, pseudoscientific free for all she helped create.
Forty-eight hours ago, after watching Oprah Winfrey give a terrific, rousing feminist speech on an awards show, millions of Americans instantly, giddily decided that the ideal 2020 Democratic nominee had appeared. An extremely rich and famous and exciting star and impresariobut one who seems intelligent and wise and kind, the nonBizarro World version of the sitting president.
Some wet-blanketing followed immediately, among the best from the New York Times Magazine writer Thomas Chatterton Williams in an op-ed headlined Oprah, Dont Do It. It would be a devastating, self-inflicted wound for the Democrats to settle for even benevolent mimicry of Mr. Trumps hallucinatory circus act, he wrote. Indeed, the magical thinking fueling the idea of Oprah in 2020 is a worrisome sign about the state of the Democratic Party.
Despite the magical thinking reference, neither Williams nor other skeptics have seriously addressed the big qualm I have about the prospect of a President Winfrey: Perhaps more than any other single American, she is responsible for giving national platforms and legitimacy to all sorts of magical thinking, from pseudoscientific to purely mystical, fantasies about extraterrestrials, paranormal experience, satanic cults, and more. The various fantasies she has promoted on all her media platformsher daily TV show with its 12 million devoted viewers, her magazine, her website, her cable channelarent as dangerous as Donald Trumps mainstreaming of false conspiracy theories, but for three decades she has had a major role in encouraging Americans to abandon reason and science in favor of the wishful and imaginary.
Forty-eight hours ago, after watching Oprah Winfrey give a terrific, rousing feminist speech on an awards show, millions of Americans instantly, giddily decided that the ideal 2020 Democratic nominee had appeared. An extremely rich and famous and exciting star and impresariobut one who seems intelligent and wise and kind, the nonBizarro World version of the sitting president.
Some wet-blanketing followed immediately, among the best from the New York Times Magazine writer Thomas Chatterton Williams in an op-ed headlined Oprah, Dont Do It. It would be a devastating, self-inflicted wound for the Democrats to settle for even benevolent mimicry of Mr. Trumps hallucinatory circus act, he wrote. Indeed, the magical thinking fueling the idea of Oprah in 2020 is a worrisome sign about the state of the Democratic Party.
Despite the magical thinking reference, neither Williams nor other skeptics have seriously addressed the big qualm I have about the prospect of a President Winfrey: Perhaps more than any other single American, she is responsible for giving national platforms and legitimacy to all sorts of magical thinking, from pseudoscientific to purely mystical, fantasies about extraterrestrials, paranormal experience, satanic cults, and more. The various fantasies she has promoted on all her media platformsher daily TV show with its 12 million devoted viewers, her magazine, her website, her cable channelarent as dangerous as Donald Trumps mainstreaming of false conspiracy theories, but for three decades she has had a major role in encouraging Americans to abandon reason and science in favor of the wishful and imaginary.
Long article well worth the time to read.
Sid
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oprah Winfrey Helped Create Our Irrational Pseudoscientific American Fantasyland - Slate [View all]
SidDithers
Jan 2018
OP
I often wondered what kind of idiots got behind a celebrity personality like Trump. nt
LexVegas
Jan 2018
#1
Saw her rip on someone for being polite while Ms W was at the crafts services table on a set
GoneOffShore
Jan 2018
#108
I do think it's overstating it a bit to claim she created this platform of legitimacy
kcr
Jan 2018
#8
We've seen what someone without skills does as president. I sure fucking hope the next one has some.
X_Digger
Jan 2018
#80
The fuck they aren't. Knowing how house committees work to get a bill passed..
X_Digger
Jan 2018
#84
As we see with Trump, the voters decide, ultimately, who is or is not qualified.
Sophia4
Jan 2018
#65
I can think of people I'd like a lot farther away...Paul Ryan, Donald Trump.
whathehell
Jan 2018
#33
"profound ignorance of science" my butt. She,'likely knows more than the Republican Congress
whathehell
Jan 2018
#42
See you...At least she"s not a Climate Denier, like most elected Republicans and THAT is more
whathehell
Jan 2018
#44
No, because Oprah isn't, and couldn't be, the threat that Ryan, Trump & McConnell are
whathehell
Jan 2018
#54
It can influence their view point but it doesn't automatically mean what they have to say...
Baconator
Jan 2018
#87
I am not a fan of blanket statements when someone did NO checking at all. n.t.
USALiberal
Jan 2018
#120
TV is TV: With very rare exceptions: salacious B.S. sells: ratings are everything. Not truth.
lindysalsagal
Jan 2018
#40
You must be joking...If they aren't,'t forced to smell it with Trump, they never will.
whathehell
Jan 2018
#73
Wow. The GOP is realy scared of her. Next, they will have doctored "groping" photos.
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2018
#61
Thank you. Like you, I hadn't realized that Americans were all rational and scientific
pnwmom
Jan 2018
#98