Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nobody is trying to do away with the 2nd amendment, but... [View all]byronius
(8,030 posts)108. Yeah, so did my business partner. So he called them and asked. And then shut up.
And didn't join.
They set no limits. No speed, quantity, style, or firepower. NRA thinks you should be able to buy a tank mounted with electromagnetic rail guns that can fire a projectile through twenty brick walls. NRA thinks you should be able to buy a million of those tanks.
NRA thinks mobile artillery pieces of any caliber are important for home defense. Oh, and grenades.
But you didn't know that. What else don't you know?
Well, neither of us know exactly how long the Russians have owned the NRA, or how much Russian money they gave the GOP in the last cycle.
Maybe because the ideology of the NRA is destabilizing the nation? Making us unsafe with fear?
Tactics! Russian tactics. And they're working.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, but in Switzerland you have to keep the rifle locked up, hardly any public toting,
Hoyt
Feb 2018
#101
According to Heller v DC the second does not cover any gun at any time for any purpose and
flamin lib
Feb 2018
#3
Why? Is this the place where a snarky response is to be met with demure acceptance?
Retrotech
Feb 2018
#13
"Because they did it too!" as my eleven year old niece would have said-- when she was ten.
LanternWaste
Feb 2018
#68
Difficult to imagine how the ecology managed without human intervention...
LanternWaste
Feb 2018
#69
"At first there might be lots of crooks with guns but over time that would diminish significantly"
EX500rider
Feb 2018
#93
Delusional. Please name the 38 states that would ratify this amendment...in the next 2 years
tritsofme
Feb 2018
#19
Wherewhen has militia membership been a prerequisite for the possession of firearms?
Marengo
Feb 2018
#71
In 1996, Australia Enacted Strict Gun Laws. It Hasn't Had a Mass Shooting Since.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Feb 2018
#28
You dont have to get rid of it, just read it the way it was written, solves most problems.
Eliot Rosewater
Feb 2018
#76
If it was only about the National Guard it wouldn't be in the Bill of Rights..
EX500rider
Feb 2018
#97
Well the only opinion the actually matters is the Supreme Court...and they have already decided.
EX500rider
Feb 2018
#100
And Supreme Court can revisit, and they said guns can be restricted. So your guns arent
Hoyt
Feb 2018
#103
Actually my 60+ year old bolt acton rifles are categorized as "Curio & Relics"
EX500rider
Feb 2018
#106
Yeah, so did my business partner. So he called them and asked. And then shut up.
byronius
Feb 2018
#108