Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
116. For hunting people, thats why sales have taken off. White wingers love the idea.
Sat Mar 10, 2018, 01:51 AM
Mar 2018

Last edited Sat Mar 10, 2018, 10:12 AM - Edit history (1)

Revenge of the Gun Nerds [View all] mac56 Mar 2018 OP
Yep. Can't express an opinion about guns if one is not a rabid white wing gun-nut, trained to kill. Hoyt Mar 2018 #1
Ignorance in support of a good cause is still ignorance. hack89 Mar 2018 #3
Addiction to guns and intimidation is worse. It might be a "game" to me, but it's protecting Hoyt Mar 2018 #10
And once again you prove my point. hack89 Mar 2018 #22
What's your point? That flooding the country with guns is good for someone besides gun CEOs? sharedvalues Mar 2018 #52
I buy a lot of beer and bourbon hack89 Mar 2018 #56
You're wrong, I'm sorry to say. Gun/ammo profits fund child killings. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #80
That's nice. hack89 Mar 2018 #82
It's a serious discussion. Gun buys fund the NRA, and fund killings. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #86
Bye. Nt hack89 Mar 2018 #97
How much goes to the NRA? sl8 Mar 2018 #85
It's standard corp finance: gun co's have a marketing budget. But here's some details. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #87
Thanks for the response, but it doesn't really answer my question. sl8 Mar 2018 #88
Profits go to fund gun violence. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #89
Question:"How much goes to the NRA?" Answer: " ... the deaths are on your soul" sl8 Mar 2018 #90
Answer #1: "hundreds of millions, here's a citation" sharedvalues Mar 2018 #91
Really? When did the NRA support terrorist activities in the US? SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #115
Answer #1: hundreds of millions. Heres a citation sharedvalues Mar 2018 #119
See my answer below. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #132
Your post is a big rightwing talking point sharedvalues Mar 2018 #135
Do sales between individuals fund the NRA? If I buy a box of ammo from my neighbor, am I funding... Marengo Mar 2018 #136
What about private sales between individuals ? Marengo Mar 2018 #93
Is there a mathematical formula for computing the amount of blood on my hands? Devil Child Mar 2018 #96
That didnt take long, Example number one right here. Canoe52 Mar 2018 #103
Just for diversity Alea Mar 2018 #11
Hum, I'd call that arming up against the majority of gun-strokers who are white wing racists Hoyt Mar 2018 #12
So in other words Alea Mar 2018 #16
This... Puha Ekapi_2 Mar 2018 #47
Most guns in this country are not purchased for self-defense, unless you think Hoyt Mar 2018 #49
Bless your heart. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #50
Would you categorize those in the photos posted by Alea as gunners? Marengo Mar 2018 #59
I would categorize that as a blatant attempt to obscure the fact that white wing racist gunners Hoyt Mar 2018 #60
Looking at murders statistics, can't one say that gunners of all races put guns over society? hack89 Mar 2018 #62
White gunners are the only ones arming up against government and changing demographics they are Hoyt Mar 2018 #63
So the people actually killing people aren't the real danger? hack89 Mar 2018 #65
Clearly not. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #72
There would be a lot less poor on poor gun crime if you guys would quit buying more guns. Hoyt Mar 2018 #73
That makes no sense at all. hack89 Mar 2018 #74
Of course it doesn't. You are for protecting guns, no matter what. Hoyt Mar 2018 #75
Except for all the gun control laws I support, you mean? hack89 Mar 2018 #77
Your failure to answer is noted. Im going to ask you again, do you categorize them as gunners... Marengo Mar 2018 #70
Would you categorize the folks in those photos as gunners? Marengo Mar 2018 #48
We've had this argument before Hoyt.... Adrahil Mar 2018 #17
Sure. Pass real bans, that actually work. As Rubio said (to cheers): need to ban semi-autos sharedvalues Mar 2018 #53
I'm not interested in people who can't imagine life without guns influencing society's gun laws. Hoyt Mar 2018 #64
Crazed looking sociopaths or slobs pretending they can fight like soldiers. BSdetect Mar 2018 #2
Loud mouthed, one issue, fuckwit, assholes. Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #4
That includes 30 percent of the democratic party Alea Mar 2018 #15
Melt every fucking gun in the world. Fuck Guns. Fuck Gunnerz. Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #28
Back at ya Alea Mar 2018 #31
I find it's always better... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #94
? SammyWinstonJack Mar 2018 #61
Meh, its a line that isnt as far over as the gun banners scream it is Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #5
I have no objection to being shown where I am plainly in error mac56 Mar 2018 #6
Oh of course. But the other side has their version too. Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #8
"Gunsplaining" is routinely used by your side to terminate meaningful dialogue. Paladin Mar 2018 #7
Of course it is Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #9
Got some examples of these "falsehoods?" Hoyt Mar 2018 #13
Here are some I have seen here or in sources people linked to from here : Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #20
Ah come on, those might be exaggerations, kind of like gunners exaggerate the need for Hoyt Mar 2018 #27
Teflon coated bullets are "cop killers" SQUEE Mar 2018 #33
Are there weapons or loads more likely to penetrate an armored vest? If so, then there are so-called Hoyt Mar 2018 #37
Not really Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #39
Well, those guys out in LA years ago, sure managed to take out the police. Of course, they were Hoyt Mar 2018 #42
Sure, the person can have an opinion Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #66
Don't care about gunners' experience with lethal weapons. Has nothing to do with whether guns Hoyt Mar 2018 #67
"Well, those guys out in LA years ago, sure managed to take out the police" Not really... EX500rider Mar 2018 #104
I don't think you read your citation -- "twelve police officers and eight civilians were injured. ." Hoyt Mar 2018 #105
I know all about the events of that day and the only ones taken out as in killed were the robbers EX500rider Mar 2018 #107
Any centerfire rifle round will penetrate the typical police vest hack89 Mar 2018 #40
Guess to protect our police we'll just need to ban all ammo. Hoyt Mar 2018 #41
Good luck with that. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #51
I love DU performance art. hack89 Mar 2018 #68
Handgun bullets are cop-killers. That's why Canada, the UK, Japan and Australia all-but-ban them. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #54
We need a post recommend button. Hoyt Mar 2018 #57
+1. We're on the right side of history. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #79
Right, because most the criminals who currently kill cops and are already prohibited.. EX500rider Mar 2018 #111
"your side" Alea Mar 2018 #23
Would you vote for GOPers if tougher gun laws were supported by Dems? Hoyt Mar 2018 #44
It's not just about "imprecise terminology" Adrahil Mar 2018 #14
So sorry that "liberals" and "progressives" aren't living up to your standards. Paladin Mar 2018 #19
You assume a lot. Adrahil Mar 2018 #24
I was born prior to 1957, and spent my entire life handling firearms of all types. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #35
Exactly how much "technical depth" does it require mac56 Mar 2018 #21
Enough to formulate meaningful laws that actually do something hack89 Mar 2018 #25
Well, if you want to actually regulate them... Adrahil Mar 2018 #26
NO. Absolutely NOT. Every American can and should be pro-gun-control. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #55
How do you avoid getting rolled by the NRA again like what happened in 1994 with the AWB? hack89 Mar 2018 #69
Fight. Stand up for waht you believe in. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #78
But no place about knowledge of the things you want to regulate? hack89 Mar 2018 #81
I must have missed where all the AIDS activists in the 80s were medical researcher PhDs sharedvalues Mar 2018 #83
Then you will fail like in 1994 hack89 Mar 2018 #84
No. Grassroots advocacy is needed. Not everyone needs to be an expert. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #92
Ok. Nt hack89 Mar 2018 #98
Exactly. All else is just stalling and BS. Hoyt Mar 2018 #45
Firearms work by sending bullets out of a metal barrel. What else is there to "know"? Fred Sanders Mar 2018 #102
They are like grammar nazis Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2018 #18
All too familiar on DU billh58 Mar 2018 #29
It might not be that way if the pro-regulation folks weren't... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #95
I had some nut try this because I mentioned teflon bullets, correcting me as "teflon coated". TheBlackAdder Mar 2018 #30
"He tried to trip me up with lingo, because he couldn't refute anything else I was saying." mac56 Mar 2018 #34
What's worse is that I've seen some pre-emptively gunsplain. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #32
To be fair. A lot of folks on social medai think that AR stands for SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #36
Which it is in fact is. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #38
It's not an assault rifle by any stretch. But thanks for the comment. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #100
It's A) a rifle, and.... Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #101
Then I guess the advertising that I posted is a hoax and not the real thing? SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #114
The advertising you posted was just that. A marketing scheme. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #126
Not an assault rifle and NEVER marketed as one. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #131
I'll never understand that the purpose of hunting is to obliterate your game? Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #133
I'm actually not defendng the AR-15. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #134
I don't give a damn how it was marketed. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #137
I doubt the association escaped the gun Marketeers. Hoyt Mar 2018 #46
Considering the rifle was "marketed" in 1960, I doubt it. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #99
They could have changed the designation at anytime since. Bet my rear, Marketeers said No. Hoyt Mar 2018 #106
Hahaha Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #108
Well, let's go sue these gun stores. Hoyt Mar 2018 #109
Good luck with that. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #110
Check your aim. You missed the target. He said AR-15 belongs to Colt. Hoyt Mar 2018 #112
AR 15 does belong to Colt. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #117
Just repeating what DU gun expert -- only ones allowed to express opinions on sicko "hobby" -- said. Hoyt Mar 2018 #122
In what way did that poster make an excuse for shooting an innocent kid? Marengo Mar 2018 #129
Nice try, but it was "marketeered" as a hunting rifle. See my other response this thread. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #113
For hunting people, thats why sales have taken off. White wingers love the idea. Hoyt Mar 2018 #116
No, AzureCrest Mar 2018 #118
Don't think hunters -- of animals -- need a rifle with that capacity. Fact is, only 6% of population Hoyt Mar 2018 #121
Depends on the wildlife. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #123
Typical gunners nowadays, and what gunners refer to as hunters. Hoyt Mar 2018 #124
Uh huh. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #125
Why are you here? nt Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2018 #127
It's a discussion board. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #128
In 1960? Nice try, try again. SlimJimmy Mar 2018 #130
This isn't news to anyone who follows this issue on DU maxsolomon Mar 2018 #43
A perfect example of why you need to know the gun laws when debating just happened to a candidate Lee-Lee Mar 2018 #58
"Well-Meaning Gun Owner Accidentally Creates Illegal Firearm in Viral Video" sl8 Mar 2018 #71
Boy is that familiar... HopeAgain Mar 2018 #76
The new trend for gun humpers is to blow your own head off first. pwb Mar 2018 #120
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Revenge of the Gun Nerds»Reply #116