Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
21. not a particularly deep inquiry into any of those issues
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jul 2012

(which, again, underscores why it isn't a very convincing analogy)

how people watch them: although some olympic events are delayed on broadcast tv, they are all live streaming on the internet.

how they are delivered: see above


I would wager that the percentage of debate viewers who first watch the presidential debates on tape delay is very, very small. I'd also wager that the percentage of Olympics viewers who first watch the events tape-delayed tonight (as opposed to having seen them live-streaming online, whether they had access to such or not) will be very, very large.

Presidential debates are typically broadcast on television by all four major broadcast networks and at least three cable news networks. Additionally, each of these networks is likely to stream audio and/or video on their website. There will be other websites, too, that will stream this content live as it happens. (Additionally, radio stations/networks broadcast audio of the event live as it happens.)

On the other hand, relatively few olympic events are being broadcast live on TV in the United States. Yes, they are all streaming live on the Internet, but they are nowhere near as readily available as the presidential debates. For instance, NBC has all sports streaming live online, but (as I understand it) you can't access that streaming unless you have a cable package. There are other sites you can go to for feeds, but not everyone will know about them, some of them will be of questionable legality, and some people won't have the resources to actually watch them at those sites.

The actual debates themselves, additionally, are a fairly small part of the debate package. Also important are the days and hours of analysis that begin with liveblogging while the debate is underway and continue on news channels, radio networks, newspapers, and so on. Since there are typically more voters who don't watch a given debate than voters who do, that work is an influential part of the whole process. That's not the case with the olympics, where discussion for weeks in advance is meant to build anticipation as to whether team/athlete X can win event Y, culminating with the result itself.

There are plenty of other differences, too, of course. Yes, they are similar in that they are both current events and both can be watched live (with more effort and by a smaller population, in the case of the Olympics). But the differences are much more pronounced.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

oh for fuck's sake. are you actually comparing cali Jul 2012 #1
uh, yes arely staircase Jul 2012 #5
lol -- not a very convincing analogy fishwax Jul 2012 #2
one is a current event arely staircase Jul 2012 #11
those two similarities alone do not a convincing analogy make fishwax Jul 2012 #12
ok arely staircase Jul 2012 #13
not a particularly deep inquiry into any of those issues fishwax Jul 2012 #21
i'm not convinced nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #25
There is a difference Politicalboi Jul 2012 #3
who in their right mind would place a bet on a delayed event arely staircase Jul 2012 #4
Spoiler Alert: Mitt makes an Ass of himself itsrobert Jul 2012 #6
yes. arely staircase Jul 2012 #8
Good grief nt SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #7
We'll be sure to put up a Spoiler Alert. nolabear Jul 2012 #9
Fail. n/t BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #10
Nuance is very difficult. n/t Cerridwen Jul 2012 #14
Yeah, 'cause that's exactly the same thing... SidDithers Jul 2012 #15
how is that different that posting "gingrich wins mississippi primary" ? nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #16
Moving the goalposts... SidDithers Jul 2012 #17
didn't say it was arely staircase Jul 2012 #18
My answer is don't post Olympic results in the subject line... SidDithers Jul 2012 #19
the question was how is it different that posting election results. nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #22
No, the question was how is it different from live blogging a debate...nt SidDithers Jul 2012 #23
no it is part of it. arely staircase Jul 2012 #26
I answered your OP with post #15... SidDithers Jul 2012 #28
i'm not going to start a new op to ask something that is completely arely staircase Jul 2012 #29
Because there is nothing to watch in an election. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #38
With a post like this johnnie Jul 2012 #20
Winner! JoePhilly Jul 2012 #24
i know, right? arely staircase Jul 2012 #27
To be clear, the thread was "spoiled" when you pressed the POST button. JoePhilly Jul 2012 #32
no, i mean it arely staircase Jul 2012 #33
I usually masturbate in private ... but that's just a personal preference. JoePhilly Jul 2012 #35
i see in this case you made an exception. nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #36
What YOU said. . . n/t annabanana Jul 2012 #30
+ 1 nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #31
I'll tell Skinner to get right on that for you. Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #34
+100,000 nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Presidential debates (ple...»Reply #21