Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 01:08 PM Jan 2012

David Swanson: Obama Crowned Himself King on New Year’s Eve [View all]

(Brief Excerpt)

Obama Crowned Himself on New Year’s Eve
By: David Swanson
December 31, 2011


To prevent the U.S. government from behaving like a king, the drafters of the U.S. Constitution empowered an elected legislature to write every law, to declare every war, and to remove its executive from office. To further prevent the abuse of individuals’ rights, those authors wrote into the Constitution, even prior to the Bill of Rights, the right to habeas corpus and the right never to be punished for treason unless convicted in an open court on the testimony of at least two witnesses to an overt act of war or assistance of an enemy.

President Barack Obama waited until New Year’s Eve to take an action that I suspect he wanted his willfully deluded followers to have a good excuse not to notice. On that day, Obama issued an unconstitutional signing statement rewriting a law as he signed it into law, a practice that candidate Obama had rightly condemned. The law that Obama was signing was the most direct assault yet seen on the basic structure of self-governance and human rights that once made all the endless U.S. shouting of “We’re number one!” significantly less ludicrous. he National Defense Authorization Act is not a leap from democracy to tyranny, but it is another major step on a steady and accelerating decade-long march toward a police-and-war state.

President Obama has claimed the power to imprison people without a trial since his earliest months in office. He spoke in front of the Constitution in the National Archives while gutting our founding document in 2009. President Obama has claimed the power to torture “if needed,” issued an executive order claiming the power of imprisonment without trial, exercised that power on a massive scale at Bagram, and claimed and exercised the power to assassinate U.S. citizens. Obama routinely kills people with unmanned drones.

My chief regret is that we have not seen the major resistance we could have, and without any doubt would have, seen to this if only Obama were a Republican.

Please read the full article at:

http://my.firedoglake.com/davidswanson/2011/12/31/obama-crowned-himself-on-new-years-eve/

162 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so does this mean another body under the bus? xchrom Jan 2012 #1
David's been under the bus so long he has a tire tread tuxedo Donnachaidh Jan 2012 #9
! xchrom Jan 2012 #10
he goes to the 'king' shit and it just smells like a one-sided argument bigtree Jan 2012 #2
If he really believes this treestar Jan 2012 #3
The author knows better. FarPoint Jan 2012 #12
Swanson under the BUS! fascisthunter Jan 2012 #4
Now that Obama is a King treestar Jan 2012 #17
nah, it's more like, poor poor Obama, and poor treestar fascisthunter Jan 2012 #40
Now that your freedoms are gone treestar Jan 2012 #54
sorry, you'll have to put up with my criticizing OUR President fascisthunter Jan 2012 #156
I've been doing that treestar Jan 2012 #159
He willingly jumps under every bus on that route. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #35
Aw, Geez.... MineralMan Jan 2012 #5
+1 treestar Jan 2012 #27
Why would that be? Obama likes the insurance cartel and "uniquely American" bogus solutions. TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #42
>Implying Obama actually wants single payer. Edweird Jan 2012 #69
Yes. I believe he does want that. MineralMan Jan 2012 #71
You believe it - despite all indications to the contrary. Edweird Jan 2012 #83
David Swanson also bloviated "Osama bin Lynched"... SidDithers Jan 2012 #6
yes getdown Jan 2012 #30
David Swanson is an oustanding DUer. Octafish Jan 2012 #118
Sure. His Pearl Harbor truther stuff is great... SidDithers Jan 2012 #125
So's his analysis of the BFEE and Prescott Bush's role in the fascist Wall Street Coup Against FDR. Octafish Jan 2012 #129
+1 proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #145
what does he say about non voting foreign SwampG8r Jan 2012 #152
ROFL!!...nt SidDithers Jan 2012 #154
Yet another thing I agree with him on tavalon Jan 2012 #153
Does ProSense Jan 2012 #7
Good point, of course. elleng Jan 2012 #16
No kidding. CakeGrrl Jan 2012 #51
Elective Monarchy... Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #70
'Unconstitutional signing statement?' elleng Jan 2012 #8
Yeah. WTF?... SidDithers Jan 2012 #13
Which article of the Constitution are signing statements established in? MNBrewer Jan 2012 #66
Which article of the Constitution precludes the issuing of a signing statement? Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #73
No part of the Constitution permits Presidential signing statements, and no part of the sad sally Jan 2012 #97
I didn't claim they had any legal value. Quite clearly they do not. Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #99
Sorry - didn't mean to challenge anything you said. sad sally Jan 2012 #101
No need to apologize! Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #106
"Not prohibited" is not the test, nor could it be, as the "not prohibiteds" are INFINITE. WinkyDink Jan 2012 #133
Sorry, but I think you're looking at Constitutional authorization Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #149
Okay, fine: Extraconstitutional signing statement. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #105
Okay, fine: Somethng quite different Dewey Finn Jan 2012 #150
Wasn't me who "insinuated" anything. I merely cut in to respond (something allowed in threads). JackRiddler Jan 2012 #155
Unrec. Pure hysterical bullshit. n/t FSogol Jan 2012 #11
facts getdown Jan 2012 #34
Given that the basic premise is factually incorrect, mythology Jan 2012 #43
it's not getdown Jan 2012 #46
Amazingly, we still live in a country where one could write such things about the Prez with no FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #14
How do you know Swanson isn't on some FBI "subversive" or "radical" surveillance list? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #20
I have met him and really like the man and his sincerity. Shrug. nt Mojorabbit Jan 2012 #28
Why would he be? FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #29
Because he's a dissident and critic of the federal government. That's reason enough today. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #61
But while you have no proof of that Swanson is still a free man making $$$$ by writing articles. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #64
What does that have to do with government spying on and surveillance of dissidents. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #119
My dad was NSA Charlemagne Jan 2012 #136
Really? Then why are President Obama's detractors MineralMan Jan 2012 #72
Not to mention all of those evil teabaggers. You'd a thunk they'd be the first to go. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #81
I keep wondering about that too. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #102
So you deny that our civil liberties and Constitution are under attack? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #132
Woo-woo.... MineralMan Jan 2012 #36
Given his real-world organizing there is no way he is not. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #107
OK, help me out here. I don't get it. no_hypocrisy Jan 2012 #15
Swanson has always distorted. tabatha Jan 2012 #21
he has. he does. More than any other commentator on the left. cali Jan 2012 #160
I'm waiting eagerly , now that this has happened treestar Jan 2012 #22
Good one, thinking people. elleng Jan 2012 #24
You will probably find the answers to your questions if you read the entire article by Swanson. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #25
Yes, he's a DUer. Why not let him post his own screed? MineralMan Jan 2012 #37
Because it's not yet in a book that's for sale RZM Jan 2012 #49
Well, there is that, I suppose. MineralMan Jan 2012 #50
"I don't think I've seen David Swanson on DU3" He has a DU Journal. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #94
OK. Still, I have not noticed him here. MineralMan Jan 2012 #96
(spits coffee) Robb Jan 2012 #112
Are you telling DU'ers when and how to post on Democratic Underground? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #63
Uh, I asked you a question. I didn't tell you to MineralMan Jan 2012 #67
. Bobbie Jo Jan 2012 #93
obama retained getdown Jan 2012 #33
On record is the veto, the signing statements are nothing. They aren't law but the bill signed is. TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #80
Sorry, Swanson has always been under the bus for me tabatha Jan 2012 #18
yup. PeaceNikki Jan 2012 #31
+ 1 nt Kahuna Jan 2012 #87
+2 ellisonz Jan 2012 #161
Obama Bad Obama Bad Obama Bad Obama Bad Obama Bad JoePhilly Jan 2012 #19
Love how he insults Democrats in this sentence... Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #39
YUP / nt JoePhilly Jan 2012 #44
Yup, I got to that line... one_voice Jan 2012 #47
What? You don't pass out from joy when stupid, uninformed people call YOU the stupid one? Number23 Jan 2012 #144
Look at the bright side, David! treestar Jan 2012 #23
Absolutely. And he can slap a big fat tax MineralMan Jan 2012 #41
He has no such inclination and outcomes indicate the position of a small increase was phony TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #48
Finally the banks can be nationalized! treestar Jan 2012 #53
Yeah I'm sure he'll get right on that a simple pattern Jan 2012 #135
All HAIL KING OBAMA! FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #57
Yes, we've known that since HCR. treestar Jan 2012 #59
"Bully Pulpit!!", "Pretty speech!", "Bully Pulpit!!", "Pretty speech!", "Bully Pulpit!!", "Pretty sp JoePhilly Jan 2012 #104
He doesn't want single payer. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #84
Now that he's King, he doesn't treestar Jan 2012 #91
like we saw getdown Jan 2012 #26
Many Democratic Senators supported the Bush regimes actions such as the Patriot Act. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #56
yup getdown Jan 2012 #58
Crap on this logic! mfcorey1 Jan 2012 #32
I can't find the article Swanson wrote rocktivity Jan 2012 #38
He wrote quite a bit about Bush's imperial presidency and then an entire book about it. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #75
Yet he accuses Obama of the same thing? rocktivity Jan 2012 #121
What? That makes zero sense. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #128
Yanno, why doesn't an idiot like this just find another line of work. Cab driver or somthin'. They deacon Jan 2012 #45
Another powerful rebuttal! You smart! Better Believe It Jan 2012 #55
Ride in a lot of cabs deacon? HangOnKids Jan 2012 #126
More anti-Obama screed? How surprising! MjolnirTime Jan 2012 #52
Really. Surprising? HangOnKids Jan 2012 #114
Let Me Be Clear by David Swanson Better Believe It Jan 2012 #60
Wait ProSense Jan 2012 #62
bush did it = bad, obama does it = hallelujah. ok nt msongs Jan 2012 #65
Obviously, Mr. Swanson hasn't READ the signing statement. johnaries Jan 2012 #68
The statement is a fat nothing. It isn't binding even to the guy who signed it much less TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #82
the passage of the NDAA pisses me off, but that is over the top. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #74
+1 fishwax Jan 2012 #77
Seems essentially accurate to me. Circumventing the entire basis of the law and one man's TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #85
+1000 and ty inna Jan 2012 #100
the drafters did NOT empower an *elected* legislature to declare war (or any of those other things) fishwax Jan 2012 #76
This is rhetorically over the top cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #78
Swanson keeps going farther 'round the bend. madamesilverspurs Jan 2012 #79
Hahahaha. Loony toons. DevonRex Jan 2012 #86
He 'crowned himself' with a bill he couldn't have vetoed? What bullshit. n/t Akoto Jan 2012 #88
It's even worse than that! DevonRex Jan 2012 #89
Why do you think Obama could not have vetoed the bill? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #95
The bill had a veto-proof majority in both houses of Congress. n/t Akoto Jan 2012 #130
You must not be aware of people's changing their minds after a VETO. WinkyDink Jan 2012 #134
That may be true but that didn't prevent Obama from vetoing the legislation. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #141
The president has lost veto power? When did that happen? JackRiddler Jan 2012 #109
He never had the power to veto veto-proof legislation from Congress. n/t Akoto Jan 2012 #131
There is no "veto-proof." JackRiddler Jan 2012 #137
This message was self-deleted by its author spanone Jan 2012 #90
But..but..didn't he veto it..as promised? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #92
Oh well...guess I'll have to join the Republicanunderground now. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #98
Hey, don't go yet. Stick around a bit. I just got an e-mail from King Barack I. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #103
No way...I'm joining Ron Paul's freedumb fighters! Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #116
You'll be declared 'Outlaw', and all your lands confiscated by the Crown. Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #117
More hyperbolic bullshit from the left's version of the TeaNuts. RBInMaine Jan 2012 #108
isn't he the frozen tv dinner heir? Whisp Jan 2012 #110
Swanson is another liberal Paulite. Robb Jan 2012 #111
"In the absence of progressives with backbones, more Libertarians like Paul would be welcome" ProSense Jan 2012 #120
What these people don't understand, let's just say it's true. joshcryer Jan 2012 #124
Funny how so much of the over-the-top Obama hating hyperbole... SidDithers Jan 2012 #127
No coincidence. joshcryer Jan 2012 #140
None whatsoever. Bobbie Jo Jan 2012 #146
They're gaming the system, which was expected, of course. joshcryer Jan 2012 #147
Gotta love the recs for that post and this one Number23 Jan 2012 #148
This isn't hyperbolic to the extreme! killbotfactory Jan 2012 #113
K&R NorthCarolina Jan 2012 #115
Good. Perhaps now he can raise taxes mzmolly Jan 2012 #122
Does that mean we don't need congress anymore? joshcryer Jan 2012 #123
The President doesn't need Congress anymore for a lot of things. bvar22 Jan 2012 #138
So that helps the economy and social welfare how? joshcryer Jan 2012 #139
And WHICH Party's Congressmen are going to: bvar22 Jan 2012 #142
Long screed aside, it's simply which is more likely to stop it: joshcryer Jan 2012 #143
Cenk also discussed this tavalon Jan 2012 #151
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #157
It's the same, same old song..... cliffordu Jan 2012 #158
Wow Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #162
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Swanson: Obama Cr...