Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)

3. Yes it was a quid pro quo, but Dems shouldnt demand anything.

Reply to meadowlander (Original post)

Wed Apr 25, 2018, 07:55 PM

Apr 2018

What’s the basis for demanding a health evaluation? We have no right to the president’s medical records any more than we have a right to his tax returns.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Was Jacksons nomination a quid pro quo [View all] meadowlander Apr 2018 OP

Private manor321 Apr 2018 #1

I have no doubt it was Siwsan Apr 2018 #2

Yes it was a quid pro quo, but Dems shouldnt demand anything. Shrike47 Apr 2018 #3

I have been asking the same thing all day. deminks Apr 2018 #4

My 1st thought too.. 2nd thing was he's Trump's Candy(Speed)Doc. stuffmatters Apr 2018 #5

Omg excellent connection. Corvo Bianco Apr 2018 #9

THE DONNY AND RONNY SHOW: Donny: You give me a great physical report and I'll cornball 24 Apr 2018 #6

"The Donny and Ronny Show." 3catwoman3 Apr 2018 #11

I suspect yes, with the cover that it is over privatization elfin Apr 2018 #7

Doesn't need to be a quid pro quo marylandblue Apr 2018 #8

I've been wondering about the Candy Man aspect myself RandomAccess Apr 2018 #10