General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders to run as a Democrat -- but not accept nomination (2018 Senate) [View all]dawg day
(7,947 posts)And the main import of it is that we rtfck the other party's primaries. It's fun! Here's how it works:
GOP primary: Two candidates running:
1- is "establishment" and within the bounds of the crazy GOP, pretty normal. In our conservative state, he (always HE, natch) can probably win the general election against the Democrat.
2- really crazy guy who rants about how Ebola is God's punishment for gay marriage (or the like-- like disputing that women should be able to say they were raped if they were wearing shorts, you know).
Many Democrats cross over on primary day (avoiding the Democratic party's usual boring primary) and vote for #2.
#2 is too crazy even for our conservative voters, and Democratic candidate easily wins general election. #1 plausible GOP candidate is considered a big loser and never runs again.
This is all very fun when we're scuttling the chances of a plausible GOP candidate... not so fun when a nutcase (I mean, certifiable in this case) gets nominated over a good Democrat for Congress. (This happened a few elections ago, and of course the nutcase lost in the general, because the party really was not going to support a man best known for stalking teenaged movie stars and pretending to be their agents.)
I realize for some reason Sanders thinks if only non-Democrats can vote in Democratic primaries, he would now be president or something. But far more likely is what we see in my state-- interference by the other party's voters.
Changing the rules for presidential primaries also changes the rules for state and local candidates, and in those cases, the "non-establishment candidate" won't be nice Senator Sanders, but Carey the Coal Mine Owner Who Wants to Pollute Your Air Bigly, and Barney the Creep Who Wants to Lower the Age of Sexual Consent to 11.
Just something to keep in mind-- open primaries are not more "democratic." Easy (up to the day of the primary) registration is more democratic, and would accomplish the "freedom" thing without inviting the destruction of the plausible candidates.