General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders to run as a Democrat -- but not accept nomination (2018 Senate) [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You write, "I really loved your posts on the DNC fraud case where you were wrong on every claim made."
Do you see those little things that are kind of up in the air near the top of the line in the preceding paragraph? They're called quotation marks. They indicate that the material between them is a verbatim quotation.
Your favorite sport about the DNC fraud lawsuit was to make up some statement, falsely claim that I said it, and then triumphantly refute your own invention.
I'll be glad to discuss the suit with you (although a different thread would probably be a better place). Just link to the post of mine that you're referencing and quote -- verbatim -- the statement of mine that you assert is wrong. As of right now, I stand by everything I wrote, but I'm prepared to learn that I made a mistake in what I wrote. My only condition is that the discussion must be about something I actually wrote, not one of your straw-man arguments.
As for the actual subject of this thread, your idiosyncratic use of the word "cheat" is absurd. Your assertion that Vermont is the only state where this could happen is probably false, but I'm not going to go research 48 states' laws to find out, because it's irrelevant. I support the right of the Vermont Democratic Party to make its decisions in the context of Vermont law, even if Texans are displeased.