Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)538: What the rise of Kamala Harris tells us about the Democratic Party [View all]
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-the-rise-of-kamala-harris-tells-us-about-the-democratic-party/In the days after Hillary Clintons defeat, the two people who seemed like the Democratic Partys most obvious 2020 candidates, then-Vice President Joe Biden and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, hinted that Clinton had gone too far in talking about issues of identity. It is not good enough for somebody to say, Im a woman; vote for me, Sanders said. Other liberals lamented that the party had lost white voters in such states as Ohio and Iowa who had supported Barack Obama, and they said Democrats needed to dial back the identity talk to win them back.
But that view never took hold among party activists. Liberal-leaning women were emboldened to talk about gender more, not less, after the 2016 election. Weve had womens marches and women running for office in greater numbers than ever all while emphasizing their gender. President Trumps moves kept identity issues at the forefront, too, and gave Democrats an opportunity both to defend groups they view as disadvantaged and to attack the policies of a president they hate.
The Democratic Party hasnt simply maintained its liberalism on identity; the party is perhaps further to the left on those issues than it was even one or two years ago. Biden and Sanders are still viable presidential contenders. But in this environment, so is a woman who is the daughter of two immigrants (one from Jamaica and the other from India); who grew up in Oakland, graduated from Howard and rose through the political ranks of the most liberal of liberal bastions, San Francisco; who was just elected to the Senate in 2016 and, in that job, declared that California represents the future and pushed Democrats toward a government shutdown last year to defend undocumented immigrants; and who regularly invokes slavery in her stump speech. (We are a nation of immigrants. Unless you are Native American or your people were kidnapped and placed on a slave ship, your people are immigrants.)
Sen. Kamala Harris has not officially said she is running in 2020, but she hasnt denied it, either, and shes showing many of the signs of someone who is preparing for a run, including campaigning for her Democratic colleagues in key races and signing a deal to write a book. The Californian ranks low in polls of the potential Democratic 2020 field, and she doesnt have the name recognition of other contenders. (Her first name is still widely mispronounced its COM-ma-la.) But betting markets have her near the top, reflecting the view among political insiders that Harris could win the Democratic nomination with a coalition of well-educated whites and blacks, the way Obama did in 2008.
SNIP
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
538: What the rise of Kamala Harris tells us about the Democratic Party [View all]
pnwmom
Aug 2018
OP
Most important thing, she is a Democrat, and is proud to identiy as a DEMOCRAT
still_one
Aug 2018
#3
No, the most important thing is her character, her stands on the issues, and her electability.
LiberalLovinLug
Aug 2018
#76
I do not want people who don't want to be Democrats using the Democratic Party for their own
still_one
Aug 2018
#79
I'm willing to embrace the exception to the rule...if the exception is worth it
LiberalLovinLug
Aug 2018
#81
Please spare me the bullshit of diversity as the Jill Steins and Susan Saradons's, and those other
still_one
Aug 2018
#86
I never mentioned Bernie in my post. I was referring to those self-identified progressives who have
still_one
Aug 2018
#109
The statement that I do want Democrats determining the future of the Democratic party is true, and
still_one
Aug 2018
#114
She has the most liberal voting record of any Democrat (or Independent) in the Senate
NewJeffCT
Aug 2018
#119
Don't push the BS. We wouldn't have lost two SC nominees if those self-identified
still_one
Aug 2018
#104
My added point was the lipinski open primary, where because of that open primary lipinski won over
still_one
Aug 2018
#115
You want to see turnout like you've never seen before? Nominate Harris in 2020
TeamPooka
Aug 2018
#13
Agreed. She's been my choice for over a year now. With Harris, I'm confident we'll crush Trump...
Garrett78
Aug 2018
#24
She is my Senator here in CA and I'm going to support her in the primary if she runs.
TeamPooka
Aug 2018
#12
The Republicans just chose someone who is more "New York" than anyone has been
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2018
#60
Those were the three highest profile Midwestern primaries in recent weeks. Now what did....
George II
Aug 2018
#82
It didn't work in 2016. Most of the 3rd party voters ditched the party for the general,
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#43
+++++ exactly but you see if they recognize that the Dem party is already a coalition
JHan
Aug 2018
#61
In my city, former Greens and Working Family Party members joined our Democratic Town Committee
femmedem
Aug 2018
#58
If you don't want to be part of the Democratic party, then go join the party of your choice. The
still_one
Aug 2018
#91
Hearty kick and rec! My junior Senator is looking better and better all the time.
Hekate
Aug 2018
#44
"But that view never took hold among party activists. Liberal-leaning women were emboldened to talk
Cha
Aug 2018
#63
Its called DU for a reason... "probably get my vote" LOL Vote for Jill Stein PROBABLY!
winstars
Aug 2018
#80
Twitter - baby photo of Kamala and her mom - posted by Kamala today for Womens Equality Day
womanofthehills
Aug 2018
#90